Summarize Data

daily <- flights %>%
  mutate(date = make_date(year, month, day)) %>%
  group_by(date) %>%
  summarize(n = n())

ggplot(daily, aes(date, n)) +
  geom_line()

Investigate Daily-Weekly Pattern

daily <- daily %>%
  mutate(wday = wday(date, label = TRUE))
ggplot(daily, aes(wday,n)) +
  geom_boxplot()

mod = lm(n ~ wday, data = daily)

grid <- daily %>%
  data_grid(wday) %>%
  add_predictions(mod, "n")

ggplot(daily, aes(wday, n)) +
  geom_boxplot() +
  geom_point(data = grid, color = "orange", size = 4)

Investigate residuals

daily <- daily %>%
  add_residuals(mod)

daily %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, resid)) +
  geom_ref_line(h = 0) +
  geom_line()

ggplot(daily, aes(date, resid, color = wday)) +
  geom_ref_line(h = 0, colour = "red") +
  geom_line()

daily %>%
  filter(resid < -100)
## # A tibble: 11 x 4
##    date           n wday  resid
##    <date>     <int> <ord> <dbl>
##  1 2013-01-01   842 Tue   -109.
##  2 2013-01-20   786 Sun   -105.
##  3 2013-05-26   729 Sun   -162.
##  4 2013-07-04   737 Thu   -229.
##  5 2013-07-05   822 Fri   -145.
##  6 2013-09-01   718 Sun   -173.
##  7 2013-11-28   634 Thu   -332.
##  8 2013-11-29   661 Fri   -306.
##  9 2013-12-24   761 Tue   -190.
## 10 2013-12-25   719 Wed   -244.
## 11 2013-12-31   776 Tue   -175.
daily %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, resid)) +
  geom_ref_line(h = 0, colour = "red", size = 1) +
  geom_line(color = "grey50") +
  geom_smooth(se = FALSE, span = 0.20)
## `geom_smooth()` using method = 'loess' and formula 'y ~ x'

Seasonal Saturday effect

daily %>%
  filter(wday == "Sat") %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, n)) +
  geom_point()+
  geom_line() +
  scale_x_date(
    NULL,
    date_breaks = "1 month",
    date_labels = "%b"
  )

Add Seasonal Variable

term <- function(date) {
  cut(date,
      breaks = ymd(20130101, 20130605, 20130825, 20140101),
      labels = c("spring", "summer", "fall")
      )
}

daily <- daily %>%
  mutate(term = term(date))

daily %>%
  filter(wday == "Sat") %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, n, color = term)) +
  geom_point(alpha = 1/3)+
  geom_line() +
  scale_x_date(
    NULL,
    date_breaks = "1 month",
    date_labels = "%b"
  )

daily %>%
  ggplot(aes(wday, n, color = term)) +
  geom_boxplot()

mod1 <- lm(n ~ wday, data = daily)
mod2 <- lm(n ~ wday * term, data = daily)

daily %>%
  gather_residuals(without_term = mod1, with_term = mod2) %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, resid, color = model)) +
  geom_line(alpha = 0.75)

grid <- daily %>%
  data_grid(wday, term) %>%
  add_predictions(mod2, "n")

ggplot(daily, aes(wday, n)) +
  geom_boxplot() +
  geom_point(data = grid, color = "red") +
  facet_wrap(~ term)

Better model for outliers (Robust regression)

mod3 <- MASS::rlm(n ~ wday * term, data = daily)

daily %>%
  add_residuals(mod3, "resid") %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, resid)) +
  geom_hline(yintercept = 0, size = 2, color = "red") +
  geom_line()

Computed Variables

# If you are creating variables it might be a good idea to bundle the creation of the variables up into a function
compute_vars <- function(data) {
  data %>%
    mutate(term = term(date),
           wday = wday(date, label = TRUE)
           )
}

# Another option would be to put the transformations directly in the model formula:

wday2 <- function(x) wday(x, label = TRUE)
mod3 <- lm(n ~ wday2(date) * term(date), data = daily)

Time of Year: An Alternative Approach

# We could use a more flexible model to capture the pattern of school term in the data
library(splines)
mod <- MASS::rlm(n ~ wday * ns(date, 5), data = daily)

daily %>% 
  data_grid(wday, date = seq_range(date, n = 13)) %>% 
  add_predictions(mod) %>% 
  ggplot(aes(date, pred, color = wday)) +
  geom_line() +
  geom_point()

# We see a strong pattern in the numbers of Sat flights.  This is reassuring, because we also saw that pattern in the raw data.  It's a good sign when you get the same signal from different approaches.

Question #1

Why are there fewer than expected flights on January 20, May 26 and September 1? (Hint: they all have the same explanation.) How would these days generalize into another year?

daily %>%
  filter(date %in% as.Date(c("2013-01-20","2013-05-26","2013-09-01"))) %>%
  mutate(holiday = c("Martin Luther King Jr. Day", "Memorial Day", "Labor Day")) %>%
  kable() %>% kable_styling()
date n wday resid term holiday
2013-01-20 786 Sun -105.4808 spring Martin Luther King Jr. Day
2013-05-26 729 Sun -162.4808 spring Memorial Day
2013-09-01 718 Sun -173.4808 fall Labor Day

Ans : Because these dates are the sundays prior to a public holiday. The holidays are Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Memorial Day, and Labor Day. The corresponding Sundays in 2014 will be January 19, May 25 and August 31.

Question #2

What do the three days with high positive residuals represent? How would these days generalize to another year?

daily %>%
  top_n(3, resid) %>%
  mutate(holiday = c("Thanksgiving (United States)", "Thanksgiving (United States)", "Hanukkah, Christmas, New Year")) %>%
  kable() %>% kable_styling()
date n wday resid term holiday
2013-11-30 857 Sat 112.38462 fall Thanksgiving (United States)
2013-12-01 987 Sun 95.51923 fall Thanksgiving (United States)
2013-12-28 814 Sat 69.38462 fall Hanukkah, Christmas, New Year

Ans : These are the Saturdays prior to public hodlidays, such as Thanksgiving Day in the United States , Christmas Day or Hanukkah, and New Year’s Day. Positive residuals represent higher demand. It makes sense since people tend to travel around popular holidays, especially on the holidays that feature family gathering. Same trend would observed in 2014. ## Question #3

Create a new variable that splits the “wday” variable into terms, but only for Saturdays, i.e., it should have Thurs, Fri, but Sat-summer, Sat-spring, Sat-fall. How does this model compare with the model with every combination of “wday” and “term”?

daily <- daily %>%
  mutate(wday2 = case_when(wday == "Sat" & term == "spring" ~ "Sat-spring",
                           wday == "Sat" & term == "summer" ~ "Sat-summer",
                           wday == "Sat" & term == "fall" ~ "Sat-fall",
                           T ~ as.character(wday)))
modQ3 <- lm(n ~wday2, data = daily)

daily %>%
  spread_residuals(sat_term = modQ3, all_interact = mod2) %>%
  mutate(residdiff = sat_term - all_interact) %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, residdiff)) +
  geom_ref_line(h = 0, colour = "red") +
  geom_line(alpha = 0.75) +
  labs(x="Date", y="Residuals difference") + ggtitle("Line chart")

options(scipen=100,digits=4)

rbind(broom::glance(modQ3), broom::glance(mod2)) %>%
  mutate(model = c("with Saturday and term", "with all interactions")) %>%
  kable() %>% kable_styling()
r.squared adj.r.squared sigma statistic p.value df logLik AIC BIC deviance df.residual model
0.7357 0.7297 47.36 123.84 0 9 -1921 3863 3902 798487 356 with Saturday and term
0.7573 0.7432 46.17 53.67 0 21 -1906 3856 3942 733157 344 with all interactions

Ans: Compare with the model every combination of “wday” and “term”, new model (Line chart) shows lower residuals in Spring and higher residuals in Summer.

Table shows that the model (model with Saturday and term) has lower adjusted R-squared and the higher standard error of the regression, but with slightly higher AIC than the model with all interactions.

Question #4

Create a new “wday” variable that combines the day of week, term(for Saturdays), and public holidays. What do the residuals of the model look like?

holidays <- ymd(20130101, 20130120, 20130526, 20130704, 20130705, 20130901, 20131128, 20131129, 20131130, 20131201, 20131224, 20131225, 20131231)
# Federal holidays in the United States in 2013 are available at https://www.officeholidays.com/countries/usa/2013.php.

daily <- daily %>%
  mutate(wday3 = case_when(date %in% holidays ~ "holidays",
                           T ~ as.character(wday2)))
modQ4 <- lm(n ~ wday3, data = daily)
daily <- daily %>%
  add_residuals(modQ4, "residQ4")

ggplot(daily, aes(date, residQ4)) +
  geom_ref_line(h = 0, colour = "red", size = 1) +
  geom_line() +
  labs(x="Date", y="Residuals") + ggtitle("Line chart 11")

Ans: As indicated in the figures, the line remains roughly the same as before. However, the absolute values of the extreme residuals slightly narrow down. The model with Saturday, term and holidays still predict more flights in January and February, and less flights in July. And the number of flights fluctuates during Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays.

Question #5

What happens if you fit a day-of-week effect that varies by month (i.e.m n ~ wday*month)? Why is this not very helpful?

dummy <- daily %>%
  mutate(month = month(date, label=T))
modQ5 <- lm(n ~ wday * month, data = dummy)
dummy %>%
  add_residuals(modQ5, "residQ5") %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, residQ5)) +
  geom_ref_line(h = 0, colour = "red", size = 1) +
  geom_line() +
  labs(x="Date", y="Residuals") + ggtitle("Line chart 12")

options(scipen=100,digits=4)
broom::glance(modQ5) %>% kable() %>% kable_styling()
r.squared adj.r.squared sigma statistic p.value df logLik AIC BIC deviance df.residual
0.8355 0.7869 42.05 17.2 0 84 -1835 3840 4171 496839 281

Ans: Above charts show higher volatility in high travel season - July, November and December, but lower volatility in January.The sample size for each day of the week in a month is either four or five, which may not be enough to build a robust regression. Day-of-week is not a significant explanatory variable to flights.

Question #6

What would you expect the model n ~ wday + ns(date,5) to look like? Knowing what you know about the data, why would you expect it not to be particularly effective?

modQ6 <- lm(n ~ wday + splines::ns(date, df = 5), data = daily)

daily %>%
  add_residuals(modQ6, "residQ6") %>%
  ggplot(aes(date, residQ6)) +
  geom_ref_line(h = 0, colour = "red", size = 1) +
  geom_line() +
  labs(x="Date", y="Residuals") + ggtitle("Line chart 13")

options(scipen=100,digits=4)
broom::glance(modQ6) %>% kable() %>% kable_styling()
r.squared adj.r.squared sigma statistic p.value df logLik AIC BIC deviance df.residual
0.7816 0.7748 43.23 114.9 0 12 -1887 3799 3850 659694 353

Ans: As shown in the second part of EDA, weekdays (through Monday to Friday) have similar flights distribution. In the third part of EDA, it shows that holidays, not a weekday trend across months, is more significant.

Question #7

We hypothesized that people leaving on Sundays are more likely to be business travelers who need to be somewhere on Monday. Explore the hypothesis by seeing how if breaks down based on distance and time: if it’s true, you’d expect to see more Sunday evening flights to places that are far away.

datQ7 <- flights %>%
  mutate(date = make_date(year, month, day),
         wday = wday(date, label = T)) %>%
  select(date, wday, distance, air_time, hour) %>%
  filter(hour != 1) #omit the single one record of 1 AM flight

datQ7 %>%
  ggplot(aes(wday, distance)) + geom_boxplot() +
  labs(x="Week", y="Traveling distance (miles)") + ggtitle("Boxplot 5")

datQ7 %>%
  group_by(wday) %>%
  summarise("Mean distance (miles)" = round(mean(distance)),
            "Median distance (miles)" = median(distance),
            "Mean duration (minutes)" = round(mean(air_time, na.rm = T)),
            "Median duration (minutes)" = median(air_time, na.rm = T)) %>%
  rename(Week = wday) %>%
  kable() %>% kable_styling()
Week Mean distance (miles) Median distance (miles) Mean duration (minutes) Median duration (minutes)
Sun 1055 937 152 130
Mon 1032 828 151 129
Tue 1027 820 150 128
Wed 1028 820 150 128
Thu 1033 828 150 128
Fri 1033 828 150 127
Sat 1081 944 154 134
datQ7 %>%
  group_by(wday, hour) %>%
  summarise(distMedian = median(distance)) %>%
  reshape2::acast(wday~hour, value.var="distMedian") %>%
  kable() %>% kable_styling()
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Sun 1400 963 1041 1005 950 1017.0 820 746 762 762 765 764 1008 944 944 762 719 266 1598
Mon 1400 762 1035 872 944 872.0 888 746 762 762 765 762 950 997 937 762 719 266 1598
Tue 1400 760 1035 872 944 872.0 888 746 762 762 765 762 950 944 944 740 642 266 1598
Wed 1400 760 1035 833 937 872.0 888 746 762 762 764 762 1008 937 937 753 642 266 1598
Thu 1400 760 1035 872 944 872.0 888 746 762 762 765 764 1008 944 944 762 719 266 1598
Fri 1400 760 1035 872 944 809.5 888 746 762 762 765 764 950 944 937 762 733 266 1598
Sat 1400 937 1035 944 950 1028.0 937 738 937 764 888 944 1065 1020 1005 1023 937 266 1598

Ans: Above analysis show that traveling distances in each day of the week are similar, though 100 miles more median distances are on Saturday and Sunday. Saturday travel also appears to have longer mean/median distance than Sunday travel. As for the hypothesis that business trips take off on Sunday evenings, median distances are the same at 10 PM and 11 PM whichever day of the week it is. Thus the hypothesis appears to be untrue.