How do naming vs other engagement strategies affect accuracy?

Item-level

## Warning in checkConv(attr(opt, "derivs"), opt$par, ctrl =
## control$checkConv, : Model failed to converge with max|grad| = 0.00726454
## (tol = 0.001, component 1)
## Generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood (Laplace
##   Approximation) [glmerMod]
##  Family: binomial  ( logit )
## Formula: 
## isRight ~ scale(kinds) + scale(simpson) + typ + avgFam + scale(NamingFreq_Study_num) +  
##     StudyStrat + (1 | category) + (1 | subjCode)
##    Data: tme_all
## 
##      AIC      BIC   logLik deviance df.resid 
##   4211.3   4267.0  -2096.7   4193.3     3591 
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -4.0725 -0.8915  0.4273  0.6776  1.9134 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.7073   0.8410  
##  category (Intercept) 0.2511   0.5011  
## Number of obs: 3600, groups:  subjCode, 80; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                             Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)  
## (Intercept)                  2.20010    1.86975   1.177   0.2393  
## scale(kinds)                 0.21853    0.09063   2.411   0.0159 *
## scale(simpson)              -0.13094    0.09097  -1.439   0.1501  
## typ                         -0.02666    0.01572  -1.695   0.0900 .
## avgFam                      -0.28964    0.40343  -0.718   0.4728  
## scale(NamingFreq_Study_num)  0.14698    0.10225   1.438   0.1506  
## StudyStrat                   0.07964    0.09859   0.808   0.4192  
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##             (Intr) scl(k) scl(s) typ    avgFam s(NF_S
## scale(knds)  0.363                                   
## scal(smpsn)  0.395  0.188                            
## typ         -0.035 -0.002  0.004                     
## avgFam      -0.995 -0.364 -0.397 -0.008              
## scl(NmF_S_) -0.002  0.002 -0.001 -0.001 -0.001       
## StudyStrat  -0.066  0.001 -0.001  0.000  0.000  0.042
## convergence code: 0
## Model failed to converge with max|grad| = 0.00726454 (tol = 0.001, component 1)

Subject-level

## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = testAcc ~ NamingFreq_Study_num + StudyStrat, data = tme_subj)
## 
## Residuals:
##      Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
## -0.36275 -0.10974  0.00796  0.12957  0.34129 
## 
## Coefficients:
##                      Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)           0.57990    0.05833   9.942 1.87e-15 ***
## NamingFreq_Study_num  0.01980    0.01559   1.270    0.208    
## StudyStrat            0.01739    0.01808   0.962    0.339    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 0.1671 on 77 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.03085,    Adjusted R-squared:  0.005679 
## F-statistic: 1.226 on 2 and 77 DF,  p-value: 0.2992

Subject-level graph

How does naming during study affect accuracy?

Accuracy - Naming frequency

## Warning in checkConv(attr(opt, "derivs"), opt$par, ctrl =
## control$checkConv, : Model failed to converge with max|grad| = 0.00444033
## (tol = 0.001, component 1)
## Generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood (Laplace
##   Approximation) [glmerMod]
##  Family: binomial  ( logit )
## Formula: 
## isRight ~ scale(kinds) + scale(simpson) + typ + avgFam + version *  
##     scale(NamingFreq_Study_num) + (1 | category) + (1 | subjCode)
##    Data: tme_all
## 
##      AIC      BIC   logLik deviance df.resid 
##   4206.1   4268.0  -2093.0   4186.1     3590 
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -4.0309 -0.8888  0.4264  0.6757  1.9581 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.6363   0.7977  
##  category (Intercept) 0.2510   0.5010  
## Number of obs: 3600, groups:  subjCode, 80; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                                     Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept)                          2.31585    1.86846   1.239  0.21518
## scale(kinds)                         0.21847    0.09061   2.411  0.01590
## scale(simpson)                      -0.13088    0.09095  -1.439  0.15014
## typ                                 -0.02671    0.01573  -1.698  0.08948
## avgFam                              -0.28974    0.40335  -0.718  0.47256
## version                             -0.15137    0.20151  -0.751  0.45256
## scale(NamingFreq_Study_num)          0.45449    0.15760   2.884  0.00393
## version:scale(NamingFreq_Study_num) -0.55955    0.20453  -2.736  0.00622
##                                       
## (Intercept)                           
## scale(kinds)                        * 
## scale(simpson)                        
## typ                                 . 
## avgFam                                
## version                               
## scale(NamingFreq_Study_num)         **
## version:scale(NamingFreq_Study_num) **
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##             (Intr) scl(k) scl(s) typ    avgFam versin s(NF_S
## scale(knds)  0.363                                          
## scal(smpsn)  0.395  0.188                                   
## typ         -0.035 -0.002  0.005                            
## avgFam      -0.995 -0.364 -0.397 -0.008                     
## version     -0.059 -0.001  0.001  0.004  0.000              
## scl(NmF_S_) -0.018  0.004 -0.002 -0.002 -0.001  0.185       
## vrs:(NF_S_)  0.014 -0.004  0.002  0.003  0.001 -0.053 -0.771
## convergence code: 0
## Model failed to converge with max|grad| = 0.00444033 (tol = 0.001, component 1)

Accuracy - Mentioned naming

## Generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood (Laplace
##   Approximation) [glmerMod]
##  Family: binomial  ( logit )
## Formula: 
## isRight ~ scale(kinds) + scale(simpson) + scale(studyAcc) + version *  
##     StudyStrat_naming + (1 | category) + (1 | subjCode)
##    Data: tme_all
## 
##      AIC      BIC   logLik deviance df.resid 
##   4197.1   4252.8  -2089.6   4179.1     3591 
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -3.8976 -0.8893  0.4289  0.6761  2.0097 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.5432   0.7371  
##  category (Intercept) 0.2529   0.5029  
## Number of obs: 3600, groups:  subjCode, 80; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                           Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)    
## (Intercept)                0.91754    0.18075   5.076 3.85e-07 ***
## scale(kinds)               0.19430    0.08465   2.295   0.0217 *  
## scale(simpson)            -0.15678    0.08372  -1.873   0.0611 .  
## scale(studyAcc)            0.39967    0.09171   4.358 1.31e-05 ***
## version                   -0.16339    0.21189  -0.771   0.4406    
## StudyStrat_naming          0.17825    0.29413   0.606   0.5445    
## version:StudyStrat_naming -0.53108    0.46047  -1.153   0.2488    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##             (Intr) scl(k) scl(s) scl(A) versin StdyS_
## scale(knds)  0.008                                   
## scal(smpsn)  0.001  0.051                            
## scl(stdyAc)  0.102  0.006 -0.005                     
## version     -0.703 -0.001  0.001 -0.082              
## StdyStrt_nm -0.512  0.001 -0.001 -0.124  0.438       
## vrsn:StdyS_  0.323 -0.001  0.001  0.039 -0.461 -0.634

How does naming during study affect typicality shift?

Typicality shift - Naming Frequency

## Linear mixed model fit by REML. t-tests use Satterthwaite's method [
## lmerModLmerTest]
## Formula: typ_adv_choice ~ scale(avgFam) * scale(simpson) * typ + kinds +  
##     version * scale(NamingFreq_Study_num) + (1 | category) +  
##     (1 | subjCode)
##    Data: filter(tme_all, isRight == 0)
## 
## REML criterion at convergence: 5648.6
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -2.5809 -0.6966  0.1868  0.7883  2.1769 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.1048   0.3237  
##  category (Intercept) 0.5376   0.7332  
##  Residual             5.7224   2.3922  
## Number of obs: 1211, groups:  subjCode, 80; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                                       Estimate Std. Error         df
## (Intercept)                           -3.93392    0.54404   51.88061
## scale(avgFam)                         -0.21517    0.21370  157.96764
## scale(simpson)                         0.50405    0.21541  206.40063
## typ                                    1.02822    0.03082 1164.28318
## kinds                                 -0.14223    0.20765   41.39459
## version                                0.31437    0.16317   64.17866
## scale(NamingFreq_Study_num)           -0.13595    0.13027   65.37645
## scale(avgFam):scale(simpson)           0.18409    0.20806  194.23694
## scale(avgFam):typ                     -0.01991    0.03088 1150.91221
## scale(simpson):typ                    -0.03264    0.03092 1164.65951
## version:scale(NamingFreq_Study_num)    0.30700    0.16538   64.05728
## scale(avgFam):scale(simpson):typ      -0.01895    0.03078 1178.92261
##                                     t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)                          -7.231 2.15e-09 ***
## scale(avgFam)                        -1.007   0.3155    
## scale(simpson)                        2.340   0.0202 *  
## typ                                  33.367  < 2e-16 ***
## kinds                                -0.685   0.4972    
## version                               1.927   0.0585 .  
## scale(NamingFreq_Study_num)          -1.044   0.3005    
## scale(avgFam):scale(simpson)          0.885   0.3774    
## scale(avgFam):typ                    -0.645   0.5191    
## scale(simpson):typ                   -1.056   0.2914    
## version:scale(NamingFreq_Study_num)   1.856   0.0680 .  
## scale(avgFam):scale(simpson):typ     -0.616   0.5381    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##             (Intr) scl(F) scl(s) typ    kinds  versin s(NF_S sc(F):()
## scale(vgFm)  0.233                                                   
## scal(smpsn) -0.125 -0.385                                            
## typ         -0.297 -0.024  0.036                                     
## kinds       -0.899 -0.244  0.118 -0.002                              
## version     -0.176 -0.026  0.022  0.029 -0.005                       
## scl(NmF_S_) -0.030  0.027 -0.005  0.010 -0.008  0.117                
## scl(vgF):() -0.206  0.001  0.210  0.291  0.062  0.017 -0.001         
## scl(vgFm):t -0.014 -0.719  0.283  0.006 -0.003  0.039 -0.031  0.025  
## scl(smpsn):  0.010  0.277 -0.759 -0.017  0.009 -0.021 -0.005 -0.164  
## vrs:(NF_S_)  0.029  0.000 -0.007 -0.013  0.002 -0.049 -0.786 -0.007  
## scl(vF):():  0.118  0.022 -0.162 -0.366 -0.002 -0.019 -0.002 -0.752  
##             sc(F): scl(): v:(NF_
## scale(vgFm)                     
## scal(smpsn)                     
## typ                             
## kinds                           
## version                         
## scl(NmF_S_)                     
## scl(vgF):()                     
## scl(vgFm):t                     
## scl(smpsn): -0.363              
## vrs:(NF_S_)  0.005  0.007       
## scl(vF):(): -0.017  0.168  0.009

Typicality shift - Mentioned naming

## Linear mixed model fit by REML. t-tests use Satterthwaite's method [
## lmerModLmerTest]
## Formula: 
## typ_adv_choice ~ scale(kinds) + typ * scale(avgFam) * scale(simpson) +  
##     version * StudyStrat_naming + (1 | category) + (1 | subjCode)
##    Data: filter(tme_all, isRight == 0)
## 
## REML criterion at convergence: 5648.4
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -2.5100 -0.7109  0.1925  0.8008  2.1781 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.1254   0.3541  
##  category (Intercept) 0.5381   0.7336  
##  Residual             5.7200   2.3917  
## Number of obs: 1211, groups:  subjCode, 80; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                                    Estimate Std. Error         df t value
## (Intercept)                        -4.28971    0.25234  230.84871 -17.000
## scale(kinds)                       -0.09376    0.13864   41.35775  -0.676
## typ                                 1.02974    0.03083 1163.14240  33.400
## scale(avgFam)                      -0.23045    0.21383  157.80913  -1.078
## scale(simpson)                      0.51095    0.21549  206.10126   2.371
## version                             0.26568    0.18926   71.41650   1.404
## StudyStrat_naming                   0.01021    0.27260   69.84648   0.037
## typ:scale(avgFam)                  -0.01688    0.03095 1163.43969  -0.546
## typ:scale(simpson)                 -0.03337    0.03093 1163.11955  -1.079
## scale(avgFam):scale(simpson)        0.19395    0.20820  194.07179   0.932
## version:StudyStrat_naming           0.33309    0.40723   66.01543   0.818
## typ:scale(avgFam):scale(simpson)   -0.02050    0.03081 1176.46526  -0.665
##                                  Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)                        <2e-16 ***
## scale(kinds)                       0.5026    
## typ                                <2e-16 ***
## scale(avgFam)                      0.2828    
## scale(simpson)                     0.0187 *  
## version                            0.1647    
## StudyStrat_naming                  0.9702    
## typ:scale(avgFam)                  0.5855    
## typ:scale(simpson)                 0.2808    
## scale(avgFam):scale(simpson)       0.3527    
## version:StudyStrat_naming          0.4163    
## typ:scale(avgFam):scale(simpson)   0.5060    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##             (Intr) scl(k) typ    scl(F) scl(s) versin StdyS_ ty:(F) typ:()
## scale(knds) -0.056                                                        
## typ         -0.648 -0.002                                                 
## scale(vgFm)  0.042 -0.244 -0.024                                          
## scal(smpsn) -0.046  0.118  0.036 -0.385                                   
## version     -0.475 -0.007  0.026 -0.017  0.018                            
## StdyStrt_nm -0.322 -0.005  0.012  0.010 -0.001  0.421                     
## typ:scl(vF) -0.037 -0.002  0.007 -0.720  0.283  0.025 -0.003              
## typ:scl(sm)  0.035  0.009 -0.017  0.278 -0.759 -0.013  0.010 -0.363       
## scl(vgF):() -0.332  0.062  0.292  0.001  0.210  0.015  0.009  0.026 -0.164
## vrsn:StdyS_  0.207  0.009  0.004 -0.026  0.007 -0.462 -0.669  0.041 -0.010
## typ:s(F):()  0.256 -0.002 -0.366  0.023 -0.162 -0.019 -0.020 -0.019  0.168
##             s(F):( vr:SS_
## scale(knds)              
## typ                      
## scale(vgFm)              
## scal(smpsn)              
## version                  
## StdyStrt_nm              
## typ:scl(vF)              
## typ:scl(sm)              
## scl(vgF):()              
## vrsn:StdyS_  0.009       
## typ:s(F):() -0.752 -0.004

Look at typicality shift in Study 1 and Study 2

Study 1

## Linear mixed model fit by REML. t-tests use Satterthwaite's method [
## lmerModLmerTest]
## Formula: 
## typ_adv_choice ~ kinds + avgFam + typ + simpson + (1 | subjCode) +  
##     (1 | category)
##    Data: filter(tme1, isRight == 0)
## 
## REML criterion at convergence: 2463.9
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -2.2050 -0.7110  0.1930  0.7912  2.1150 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  category (Intercept) 0.7304   0.8547  
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.2506   0.5006  
##  Residual             5.8642   2.4216  
## Number of obs: 523, groups:  category, 45; subjCode, 37
## 
## Fixed effects:
##              Estimate Std. Error        df t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)   1.90363    3.41972  36.20891   0.557   0.5812    
## kinds        -0.05667    0.26786  38.42335  -0.212   0.8336    
## avgFam       -1.43003    0.80663  36.20277  -1.773   0.0847 .  
## typ           1.04093    0.04509 491.25072  23.088   <2e-16 ***
## simpson       0.85737    0.57723  39.52533   1.485   0.1454    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##         (Intr) kinds  avgFam typ   
## kinds    0.196                     
## avgFam  -0.976 -0.364              
## typ     -0.004 -0.035 -0.057       
## simpson  0.272  0.192 -0.385  0.023

Study 2

## Linear mixed model fit by REML. t-tests use Satterthwaite's method [
## lmerModLmerTest]
## Formula: 
## typ_adv_choice ~ kinds + avgFam + typ + simpson + (1 | subjCode) +  
##     (1 | category)
##    Data: filter(tme2, isRight == 0)
## 
## REML criterion at convergence: 3554.8
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -2.4726 -0.7527  0.1963  0.7863  1.7803 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.1227   0.3503  
##  category (Intercept) 0.3332   0.5773  
##  Residual             5.8186   2.4122  
## Number of obs: 763, groups:  subjCode, 45; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##             Estimate Std. Error       df t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)   2.0889     2.5515  39.1237   0.819  0.41792    
## kinds        -0.1159     0.1977  39.7494  -0.586  0.56109    
## avgFam       -1.4612     0.5976  38.0614  -2.445  0.01922 *  
## typ           1.0550     0.0362 731.0402  29.143  < 2e-16 ***
## simpson       1.1640     0.4183  38.0154   2.783  0.00835 ** 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##         (Intr) kinds  avgFam typ   
## kinds    0.186                     
## avgFam  -0.976 -0.357              
## typ     -0.080  0.013  0.004       
## simpson  0.274  0.170 -0.381  0.012

Density plots for typicality shift depending on studied typ

Absolute value

Raw value

## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## Warning: Removed 6 rows containing missing values (geom_bar).

Histograms for typicality shift depending on studied typ

Absolute value

## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## Warning: Removed 6 rows containing missing values (geom_bar).

Raw value

## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## Warning: Removed 6 rows containing missing values (geom_bar).

TME2 analyses: remember/know

Accuracy

## Warning in checkConv(attr(opt, "derivs"), opt$par, ctrl =
## control$checkConv, : Model failed to converge with max|grad| = 0.065224
## (tol = 0.001, component 1)
## Generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood (Laplace
##   Approximation) [glmerMod]
##  Family: binomial  ( logit )
## Formula: 
## isRight ~ kinds + avgFam + typ + simpson * judgment * NamingFreq_Study_num +  
##     judgment * StudyStrat + (1 | category) + (1 | subjCode)
##    Data: tme2_full
## 
##      AIC      BIC   logLik deviance df.resid 
##   2421.5   2505.7  -1195.8   2391.5     2010 
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -3.9499 -0.8489  0.4149  0.6792  3.3429 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  category (Intercept) 0.1543   0.3928  
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.8412   0.9172  
## Number of obs: 2025, groups:  category, 45; subjCode, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                                        Estimate Std. Error z value
## (Intercept)                            -0.05356    1.69715  -0.032
## kinds                                   0.28763    0.12294   2.340
## avgFam                                 -0.21100    0.37292  -0.566
## typ                                    -0.01147    0.02081  -0.551
## simpson                                 0.76851    0.64270   1.196
## judgmentr                               2.33958    0.63949   3.659
## NamingFreq_Study_num                    0.33654    0.18179   1.851
## StudyStrat                             -0.10196    0.16575  -0.615
## simpson:judgmentr                      -1.01244    0.84108  -1.204
## simpson:NamingFreq_Study_num           -0.35470    0.19198  -1.848
## judgmentr:NamingFreq_Study_num         -0.57209    0.19302  -2.964
## judgmentr:StudyStrat                    0.01176    0.11542   0.102
## simpson:judgmentr:NamingFreq_Study_num  0.30162    0.26469   1.140
##                                        Pr(>|z|)    
## (Intercept)                            0.974823    
## kinds                                  0.019308 *  
## avgFam                                 0.571537    
## typ                                    0.581596    
## simpson                                0.231794    
## judgmentr                              0.000254 ***
## NamingFreq_Study_num                   0.064138 .  
## StudyStrat                             0.538467    
## simpson:judgmentr                      0.228690    
## simpson:NamingFreq_Study_num           0.064659 .  
## judgmentr:NamingFreq_Study_num         0.003038 ** 
## judgmentr:StudyStrat                   0.918862    
## simpson:judgmentr:NamingFreq_Study_num 0.254490    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation matrix not shown by default, as p = 13 > 12.
## Use print(x, correlation=TRUE)  or
##     vcov(x)        if you need it
## convergence code: 0
## Model failed to converge with max|grad| = 0.065224 (tol = 0.001, component 1)

Typicality shift (raw)

## Linear mixed model fit by REML. t-tests use Satterthwaite's method [
## lmerModLmerTest]
## Formula: typ_adv_choice ~ kinds + avgFam + typ * judgment * simpson +  
##     (1 | subjCode) + (1 | category)
##    Data: filter(tme2_full, isRight == 0)
## 
## REML criterion at convergence: 3555.9
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -2.5099 -0.7432  0.1876  0.7795  1.7247 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.1273   0.3568  
##  category (Intercept) 0.3136   0.5600  
##  Residual             5.8117   2.4107  
## Number of obs: 763, groups:  subjCode, 45; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                        Estimate Std. Error        df t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)             1.61442    2.57780  43.09420   0.626   0.5344    
## kinds                  -0.13896    0.19559  40.36268  -0.710   0.4815    
## avgFam                 -1.56975    0.59130  38.76351  -2.655   0.0115 *  
## typ                     1.22470    0.11511 744.66120  10.639   <2e-16 ***
## judgmentr               0.91086    0.96206 742.35917   0.947   0.3441    
## simpson                 2.27650    0.97179 452.97055   2.343   0.0196 *  
## typ:judgmentr          -0.12291    0.17042 715.78270  -0.721   0.4710    
## typ:simpson            -0.16120    0.15864 743.91927  -1.016   0.3099    
## judgmentr:simpson      -0.40441    1.31195 742.27241  -0.308   0.7580    
## typ:judgmentr:simpson  -0.02824    0.23422 722.62540  -0.121   0.9040    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##             (Intr) kinds  avgFam typ    jdgmnt simpsn typ:jd typ:sm jdgmn:
## kinds        0.186                                                        
## avgFam      -0.949 -0.354                                                 
## typ         -0.210 -0.029 -0.021                                          
## judgmentr   -0.157 -0.022 -0.026  0.652                                   
## simpson     -0.065  0.069 -0.185  0.785  0.618                            
## typ:jdgmntr  0.144  0.030  0.017 -0.702 -0.903 -0.552                     
## typ:simpson  0.202  0.013  0.009 -0.901 -0.587 -0.862  0.631              
## jdgmntr:smp  0.152 -0.014  0.020 -0.595 -0.899 -0.681  0.817  0.654       
## typ:jdgmnt: -0.156  0.001  0.005  0.633  0.810  0.604 -0.897 -0.701 -0.904

Typicality shift (absolute value)

## singular fit
## Linear mixed model fit by REML. t-tests use Satterthwaite's method [
## lmerModLmerTest]
## Formula: abs_typ_adv_choice ~ kinds + avgFam + typ * judgment + simpson *  
##     judgment + (1 | subjCode) + (1 | category)
##    Data: filter(tme2_full, isRight == 0)
## 
## REML criterion at convergence: 3153.5
## 
## Scaled residuals: 
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -1.7731 -0.7522 -0.1492  0.6331  2.6102 
## 
## Random effects:
##  Groups   Name        Variance Std.Dev.
##  subjCode (Intercept) 0.07401  0.272   
##  category (Intercept) 0.00000  0.000   
##  Residual             3.53952  1.881   
## Number of obs: 763, groups:  subjCode, 45; category, 45
## 
## Fixed effects:
##                    Estimate Std. Error        df t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)         1.43574    1.42449 749.67982   1.008   0.3138    
## kinds              -0.20759    0.11088 745.39782  -1.872   0.0616 .  
## avgFam              0.21932    0.33151 745.67669   0.662   0.5085    
## typ                 0.25365    0.03828 745.70398   6.626  6.6e-11 ***
## judgmentr           0.11063    0.43111 737.44814   0.257   0.7975    
## simpson            -0.03540    0.31048 753.64510  -0.114   0.9093    
## typ:judgmentr       0.01121    0.05684 752.33578   0.197   0.8438    
## judgmentr:simpson  -0.40389    0.43170 754.12888  -0.936   0.3498    
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Correlation of Fixed Effects:
##             (Intr) kinds  avgFam typ    jdgmnt simpsn typ:jd
## kinds        0.174                                          
## avgFam      -0.965 -0.338                                   
## typ         -0.084 -0.050 -0.044                            
## judgmentr   -0.060 -0.050 -0.071  0.468                     
## simpson      0.178  0.136 -0.326  0.035  0.457              
## typ:jdgmntr  0.000  0.093  0.075 -0.683 -0.671 -0.037       
## jdgmntr:smp  0.024 -0.045  0.076 -0.020 -0.669 -0.669  0.020
## convergence code: 0
## singular fit

Interaction between self-reported strategy, naming frequency, and judgment

Each person contributes 6 data points: their mean accuracy for typ = 2, 5, or 8, and judgment = remember or know

No strategy (N=18)

Naming (N=5)

Non-naming strategy (N=21)

Both strategies (N=1)

Are people any good at recognizing how often they’re naming?

Density plots for typicality shift depending on studied typ and judgment (Study 2)

Absolute value

Raw value

Histograms for typicality shift depending on studied typ and judgment (Study 2)

Absolute value

## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## Warning: Removed 12 rows containing missing values (geom_bar).

Raw value

## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## Warning: Removed 12 rows containing missing values (geom_bar).

Simpson vs. naming frequency - graph