This project is to explore if there is any connection between SDG12.1.1 on SCP mainstreaming and SDG 12.2.1, 12.2.2, 6.4.1, and 7.3.1. Because SDG12.1.1 only has data for 2017, only one year is analyzed.
The data was downloaded from the Global SDG Indicators Database and from the IRP Material Flows Database:
| indicator | description | source | units | year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1.1 | SCP policy instruments | Global SDG Indicators Database | 1=YES; 0=NO | 2017 |
| 12.2.1 | material footprint | IRP Global Material Flows Database | tonnes | 2017 |
| 12.2.2 | domestic material consumption | IRP Global Material Flows Database | tonnes | 2017 |
| 6.4.1 | water efficiency | Global SDG Indicators Database | United States dollars per cubic meter | 2015 |
| 7.3.1 | energy intensity | Global SDG Indicators Database | megajoules per constant 2011 purchasing power parity GDP | 2016 |
71 countries report on national SCP policy instruments. Countries that do not report (not in the 12.1.1 database were assumed to not have national SCP policy instruments.) We need to turn the SDG12.1.1 indicators into factor variables and get the log of the material footprint (mf) and domestic material consumption (dmc). We will also create a new variable scp.all that adds all the separate SCP mechanisms.
##
## Attaching package: 'dplyr'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter, lag
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
##
## intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
## 'data.frame': 186 obs. of 13 variables:
## $ country : Factor w/ 186 levels "Afghanistan",..: 180 7 120 29 131 10 76 51 78 82 ...
## $ income.level : Factor w/ 4 levels "H","L","LM","UM": 3 4 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 ...
## $ coordination.mechanism : Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ macro.policy : Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ policy.instrument : Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 ...
## $ national.action.plan : Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 ...
## $ material.footprint : num 1.92e+08 2.39e+07 6.86e+07 5.79e+07 4.61e+08 ...
## $ domestic.material.consumption: num 2.90e+08 3.25e+07 7.34e+07 8.47e+07 4.17e+08 ...
## $ water.use.efficiency : num 1.2 1.9 2.4 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.6 5.2 6.2 ...
## $ energy.intensity : num 8.18 5.29 6.45 5.81 3.07 3.81 3.43 3.65 3.85 5.19 ...
## $ scp.all : Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 ...
## $ log.mf : num 19.1 17 18 17.9 19.9 ...
## $ log.dmc : num 19.5 17.3 18.1 18.3 19.8 ...
Let’s make some boxplots.
Countries with SCP policies seem to have higher material footprint than countries without. Especially countries with sustainable consumption and production (SCP) national action plans or SCP mainstreamed as a priority or target into national policies.
Countries with SCP policies seem to have higher domestic material consumption than countries without. Especially countries with sustainable consumption and production (SCP) national action plans or SCP mainstreamed as a priority or target into national policies and countries with policy instrument for sustainable consumption and production.
Countries with SCP policies seem to have higher water use efficiency than countries without. In other words, in coutries that have SCP policies, there is a higher value added of a given major sector relative to the volume of water used.
There seems to be no difference in energy intensity between countries with SCP policies and countries without.
We can also look at the aggregated 12.1.1 data. scp.all is a factor variable of value 0 (no SCP policy instrument reported) or 1 (at least one SCP policy instrument reported)
Let’s now look at each indicator in more depth over time.
Tidy the data such that each column is a different variable.
Plot each country material footprint across time
Plot material footprint across time by scp (YES=1, NO=0) and income level (H=high income, L=low income, LM=lower medium income, UM=upper medium income) after the year 2000.
For each income group, countries reporting on scp policies have higher material footprint then countries not reporting on scp policies. THe biggest difference in between countries in the upper middle (“UM”) income group.We can also look at the changes in rates of material footprint.
| rates1990.2017 | rates1995.2005 | rates2000.2010 | rates2005.2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H0 | 0.0190552 | 0.0265462 | 0.0207946 | 0.0029283 |
| H1 | 0.0219397 | 0.0285687 | 0.0275752 | 0.0078696 |
| L0 | 0.0345533 | 0.0239565 | 0.0550348 | 0.0615898 |
| L1 | 0.0226221 | 0.0111490 | 0.0524831 | 0.0529974 |
| LM0 | 0.0448592 | 0.0291336 | 0.0840701 | 0.0589924 |
| LM1 | 0.0244094 | 0.0147652 | 0.0428400 | 0.0381472 |
| UM0 | 0.0251251 | 0.0198603 | 0.0425541 | 0.0353506 |
| UM1 | 0.0323875 | 0.0232757 | 0.0499056 | 0.0314324 |
| rates1990.2017 | rates1995.2005 | rates2000.2010 | rates2005.2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H0 | 0.0176115 | 0.0318821 | 0.0151941 | -0.0070162 |
| H1 | 0.0115897 | 0.0271772 | 0.0155740 | -0.0018644 |
| L0 | 0.0286553 | 0.0362225 | 0.0388322 | 0.0292113 |
| L1 | 0.0358157 | 0.0269430 | 0.0392797 | 0.0355769 |
| LM0 | 0.0428180 | 0.0374444 | 0.0546209 | 0.0441977 |
| LM1 | 0.0305818 | 0.0297262 | 0.0306484 | 0.0322268 |
| UM0 | 0.0272660 | 0.0245514 | 0.0318637 | 0.0225103 |
| UM1 | 0.0214034 | 0.0267829 | 0.0166300 | 0.0139972 |
Not enough data
| rates2000.2015 | rates2000.2010 | rates2005.2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H0 | -0.0415086 | -0.0286113 | -0.0344545 |
| H1 | -0.0881209 | -0.0924356 | -0.0756515 |
| L0 | -0.1479168 | -0.1039481 | -0.2093567 |
| L1 | -0.2166585 | -0.1218081 | -0.2885556 |
| LM0 | -0.1897803 | -0.2577524 | -0.1405423 |
| LM1 | -0.1245098 | -0.1372562 | -0.1178678 |
| UM0 | -0.1224201 | -0.1599209 | -0.0912134 |
| UM1 | -0.0991877 | -0.1250361 | -0.0913377 |