If you roll a pair of fair dice, what is the probability of
ANSWER: 0
ANSWER: 0.1111111
The American Community Survey is an ongoing survey that provides data every year to give communities the current information they need to plan investments and services. The 2010 American Community Survey estimates that 14.6% of Americans live below the poverty line, 20.7% speak a language other than English (foreign language) at home, and 4.2% fall into both categories.
Are living below the poverty line and speaking a foreign language at home disjoint? No, these are not mutually exclusive events. There are people who are both living below the poverty line and speak a language other than English at home.
Draw a Venn diagram summarizing the variables and their associated probabilities.
What percent of Americans live below the poverty line and only speak English at home?
Each person living below the poverty line either speaks only English at home or doesn’t.Since .146 of Americans live below the poverty line and .042 speak a language other than English at home, the other .104 only speak English at home.
P(below PL) +P(speak FL)- P(both)= 0.146 + 0.207 - 0.042 = 0.311 = 31.1% (e) What percent of Americans live above the poverty line and only speak English at home?
1 - P(below PL or speak FL) = 1 - 0.311 = 0.689 = 68.9% (f) Is the event that someone lives below the poverty line independent of the event that the person speaks a foreign language at home?
Using the multiplication rule: P(below PL) * P(speak FL)= .146 * .207 != .042, so the events are dependant.
Assortative mating is a nonrandom mating pattern where individuals with similar genotypes and/or phenotypes mate with one another more frequently than what would be expected under a random mating pattern. Researchers studying this topic collected data on eye colors of 204 Scandinavian men and their female partners. The table below summarizes the results. For simplicity, we only include heterosexual relationships in this exercise.
2.20
114/204 + 108/204 - 78/204 = 0.71
This is the conditional probability: P (female=blue|male=blue)= 78/114 = 0.68
What is the probability that a randomly chosen male respondent with brown eyes has a partner with blue eyes? 19/54 = 0.35 What about the probability of a randomly chosen male respondent with green eyes having a partner with blue eyes? 11/36 = 0.31
Does it appear that the eye colors of male respondents and their partners are independent? Explain your reasoning.
P(BlueM and BlueF)= 78/204; P(BlueM) * P(BlueF) != P(BlueM and BlueF), so we can conclude that the events are not independant.
The table below shows the distribution of books on a bookcase based on whether they are nonfiction or fiction and hardcover or paperback.
2.30
Find the probability of drawing a hardcover book first then a paperback fiction book second when drawing without replacement. 0.185
Determine the probability of drawing a fiction book first and then a hardcover book second, when drawing without replacement. 0.224
Calculate the probability of the scenario in part (b), except this time complete the calculations under the scenario where the first book is placed back on the bookcase before randomly drawing the second book.
Since replacement, we no longer need to worry about whether the fiction book drawn first is hardcover or paperback.0.223
The law of large numbers helps us here. When we’re sampling without replacement we’re really only dealing with the different between 94 and 95 total samples. Thus, the difference between is negligible.
An airline charges the following baggage fees: $25 for the first bag and $35 for the second. Suppose 54% of passengers have no checked luggage, 34% have one piece of checked luggage and 12% have two pieces. We suppose a negligible portion of people check more than two bags.
# a)
value <- c(0, 25, 25+35)
probs <- c(.54, .34, .12)
EX <- sum(value * probs)
# the expected value or avg revenue per passenger:
EX
[1] 15.7
cst <- round(sqrt(sum((value-EX)^2 * probs)), 3)
# corresponding standard deviation:
cst
[1] 19.95
# b)
# expected revenue for 120 passengers:
EX * 120
[1] 1884
# expected SD for 120 passengers:
round(sqrt(120*cst^2), 3)
[1] 218.541
#
We assume this is a discrete random variable, since there are a finite number of seats available on any given flight.
The relative frequency table below displays the distribution of annual total personal income (in 2009 inflation-adjusted dollars) for a representative sample of 96,420,486 Americans. These data come from the American Community Survey for 2005-2009. This sample is comprised of 59% males and 41% females.
Income <- c("$1 to $9,999", "$10,000 to $14,999", "$15,000 to $24,999",
"$25,000 to $34,999", "$35,000 to $49,999",
"$50,000 to $64,999", "$65,000 to $74,999",
"$75,000 to $99,999", "$100,000 or more")
Total <- c(.022, .047, .158, .183, .212, .139, .058, .084, .097)
df <- data.frame(Income, Total)
df
## Income Total
## 1 $1 to $9,999 0.022
## 2 $10,000 to $14,999 0.047
## 3 $15,000 to $24,999 0.158
## 4 $25,000 to $34,999 0.183
## 5 $35,000 to $49,999 0.212
## 6 $50,000 to $64,999 0.139
## 7 $65,000 to $74,999 0.058
## 8 $75,000 to $99,999 0.084
## 9 $100,000 or more 0.097
barplot(df$Total, main="Distribution of Personal Income, American Community Survey for 2005-2009")