Exploration of 6-scanner FA values
CMH, n=82 (35%) | CMP, n=3 (1%) | MRC, n=42 (18%) | MRP, n=36 (15%) | ZHH, n=29 (12%) | ZHP, n=43 (18%) | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex (F:M) | 26:56 | 2:1 | 10:32 | 8:28 | 13:16 | 17:26 | .168 |
Age | 28.24 (7.79) | 27.33 (4.73) | 37.67 (10.83) | 34.25 (9.88) | 37.03 (9.20) | 32.19 (11.63) | .000 |
Education | 13.51 (2.00) | 14.33 (0.58) | 13.05 (2.07) | 13.69 (2.25) | 13.41 (2.47) | 14.26 (2.26) | .190 |
Parental education | 15.15 (3.17) | 12.33 (6.35) | 14.91 (2.85) | 16.39 (2.75) | 14.79 (3.40) | 14.88 (2.83) | .142 |
SANS total score | 21.66 (12.01) | 14.33 (11.59) | 30.62 (13.07) | 27.17 (11.37) | 23.62 (9.37) | 24.47 (12.06) | .002 |
Average FA | 0.43 (0.02) | 0.37 (0.01) | 0.40 (0.02) | 0.37 (0.02) | 0.43 (0.02) | 0.37 (0.02) | .000 |
CMH, n=45 (30%) | CMP, n=1 (1%) | MRC, n=25 (16%) | MRP, n=28 (18%) | ZHH, n=19 (12%) | ZHP, n=34 (22%) | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex (F:M) | 19:26 | 1:0 | 9:16 | 14:14 | 10:9 | 18:16 | .612 |
Age | 27.20 (8.45) | 20.00 (NA) | 37.04 (11.14) | 34.36 (11.74) | 33.16 (9.45) | 35.12 (12.31) | .002 |
Education | 15.36 (1.85) | 15.00 (NA) | 15.84 (1.75) | 15.64 (2.09) | 15.16 (2.46) | 15.82 (1.98) | .781 |
Parental education | 16.20 (2.48) | 16.00 (NA) | 15.92 (2.73) | 15.24 (2.55) | 16.17 (2.79) | 15.78 (2.49) | .774 |
Average FA | 0.43 (0.01) | 0.37 (NA) | 0.41 (0.01) | 0.38 (0.02) | 0.44 (0.01) | 0.38 (0.02) | .000 |
anova(lm(AverageFA_FA~scanner+age+sex+education+par_education, data = df))
## Analysis of Variance Table
##
## Response: AverageFA_FA
## Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
## scanner 5 0.248198 0.049640 176.5171 < 2.2e-16 ***
## age 1 0.006122 0.006122 21.7686 4.439e-06 ***
## sex 1 0.001190 0.001190 4.2331 0.040410 *
## education 1 0.002811 0.002811 9.9963 0.001711 **
## par_education 1 0.000612 0.000612 2.1776 0.140962
## Residuals 338 0.095051 0.000281
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
This result shows that group (diagnosis), scanner, age, and sex have significant effect on whole-brain FA (p values <.05).
I also checked if there are any significant interactions between any combination of the variables included in the model: there was one interaction between sex and parental education.
```