1 Pre-analysis

## Observations: 48
## Variables: 29
## $ ID                                                 <dbl> 27, 20, 6, 13…
## $ Group                                              <fct> Control, Cont…
## $ `Neoadjuvant chemotherapy`                         <dbl> 0, 0, 3, 4, 2…
## $ Stage                                              <fct> IB, IIA, IIB,…
## $ Stage.numeric                                      <dbl> 1.5, 2.0, 2.5…
## $ Dose                                               <dbl> 40, 40, 40, 4…
## $ `Concomitant chemo cycles`                         <dbl> 3, 5, 3, 2, 3…
## $ `Lost cycles`                                      <dbl> 2, 0, 2, 3, 2…
## $ `Total chemotherapy received`                      <dbl> 0.6, 1.0, 0.6…
## $ Age                                                <dbl> 56, 51, 72, 5…
## $ `Age at diagnosis`                                 <dbl> 55, 50, 71, 5…
## $ `Lowest Leucocyte count`                           <dbl> 1890, 1500, 2…
## $ `Leucopenia grade`                                 <dbl> 3, 3, 2, 3, 1…
## $ `Lowest Neutrophile count`                         <dbl> 1250, 1220, 1…
## $ `Neutropenia grade`                                <dbl> 2, 2, 1, 3, 1…
## $ `Lowest Lymphocyte count`                          <dbl> 390, 170, 410…
## $ `Lymphopenia grade`                                <dbl> 3, 4, 3, 3, 1…
## $ `Lowest Platelet count`                            <dbl> 142, 131, 140…
## $ `Thrombocytopenia grade`                           <dbl> 0, 1, 0, 0, 0…
## $ `Lowest Hemoglobin`                                <dbl> 10.0, 11.8, 9…
## $ `Anemia grade`                                     <dbl> 1, 1, 2, 1, 0…
## $ `Creatinin level`                                  <fct> normal, norma…
## $ `Urinary toxicity registered`                      <dbl> 0, 0, 1, 0, 0…
## $ `Digestive toxicity registered`                    <dbl> 1, 2, 1, 1, 1…
## $ `Type of fractination used`                        <fct> 50.4/28, 50.4…
## $ `RT given to LomboAortics`                         <fct> no, no, no, y…
## $ `Patient received Secvential Boost instead of SIB` <fct> no, no, no, n…
## $ `Brachytherapy fractions`                          <dbl> 4, 0, 4, 4, N…
## $ `Radiotherapy duration (days)`                     <dbl> 37, 41, 32, 3…

2 Abstract

2.1 Group, NAC, Stage

We included 49 patients and after removing 1 patient for incompletness of key data, the final dataset included 48 patients, of which 19 (39.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC, 2 to 6 cycles, median=4). Patients stage ranged from IB to IVB with most common IIIB in NAC and IIB in controls (V=0.62, p=0.003, Mann-Whitney p<0.001). Stage is significantly correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (RSpearman=0.562, p<0.001).

NAC patients received chemotherapy doses ranging from 30 to 40 (median=40) mg/mp, lower than controls (20 to 150, median=40, p=0.027). NAC patients received a statistically similar median number of chemotherapy cycles (2, ranging from 1 to 4) as the controls (3, 1 to 5, p=0.400). NAC patients lost sugnificalnty more of their planned cycles compared to controls (1 to 4, median=3 vs. 0 to 4, median=1, p<0.001). This resulted in significantly less total chemotherapy received (expresed as a fraction of the total planned dose) in NAC patients, compared to controls (20% to 80%, median=40%, vs 20% to 100%, median=60%, p<0.001). The total chemotherapy received is significantly correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (RSpearman=-0.610, p<0.001).

Toxicity was measured by blood cell counts, hemoglobin and creatinin measurements and urinary and digestive toxicity.

2.2 Leucocytes

NAC patients showed insignifficant toxicity by leucocyte counts (median=2440, 850:6310 vs median=2510, 1080:5600, p=0.393) as well as grade of leucopenia (median=2, 0:4 vs median=2, 0:3, p=0.250).

Lowest leucocyte count is not significantly correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (RSpearman=-0.211, p=0.149), even less after adjuting for total chemotherapy received (RSpearman=0.015, p=0.920), but showed an increased correlation after adjuting for stage (RSpearman=-0.409, p=0.004).

On average, every additional neadjuvant chemotherapy cycle decreased the neutrophile count by 107.63 ±85.4 cells/mL (non significant). After adjusting for total chemotherapy received the average WBC count decreased by 26.13 ±103.4 cells/mL (non significant) but after adjusting for stage, the average neutrophile count decreased by 244.62* ±94.7 cells/mL. However, when adjusting for both at the same time, the average neutrophile count decreased by 174.24 ±113.5 cells/mL (non significant).

There is a high degree of similarity between the Lowest Neutrophile count and the Lowest Leucocyte count (R=0.934***, the same as Lin’s CCC on standardized data) which explains the similarity of the results involving these two measurements and suggests that leucocyte toxicity is primarly based on neutrophiles.

2.3 Neutrophiles

NAC patients showed insignifficant toxicity by neutrophiles counts (median=1590, 540:5190 vs median=1690, 610:3970, p=0.292) as well as grade of neutropenia (median=1, 0:3 vs median=1, 0:3, p=0.242).

Lowest Neutrophile count is not significantly correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (RSpearman=-0.235, p=0.107), even less after adjuting for total chemotherapy received (RSpearman=0.057, p=0.704), but showed an increased correlation after adjuting for stage (RSpearman=-0.423, p=0.003 ).

On average, every additional neadjuvant chemotherapy cycle decreased the neutrophile count by 95.20 ±73.31 cells/mL (non significant). After adjusting for total chemotherapy received the average neutrophile count increased by 12.22 ±86.21 cells/mL (non significant) but after adjusting for stage, the average neutrophile count decreased by 234.40** ±78.53 cells/mL. However, when adjusting for both at the same time, the average neutrophile count increased by 135.03 ±91.59 cells/mL (non significant).

2.4 Lymphocytes

NAC patients showed insignifficant toxicity by lymphocyte counts (median=400, 70:950 vs median=390, 150:660, p=0.987) as well as grade of lymphopenia (median=3, 2:4 vs median=3, 1:4, p=0.381).

Lowest lymphocyte count is not significantly correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (RSpearman=0.077, p=0.601), even after adjuting for total chemotherapy received (RSpearman=-0.073, p=0.627) nor after adjuting for stage (RSpearman=0.180, p=0.225).

On average, every additional neadjuvant chemotherapy cycle increased the lymphocyte count by 2.52 ±11.1 cells/mL (non significant). After adjusting for total chemotherapy received the average lymphocyte count decreased by 9.61 ±13.36 cells/mL (non significant) and after adjusting for stage, the average lymphocyte count increased by 11.25 ±13.05 cells/mL (non significant). When adjusting for both at the same time, the average lymphocyte count decreased by 1.08 ±15.51 cells/mL (non significant).

2.5 Platelets

NAC patients showed signifficantly more toxicity by platelet counts (median=108, 36:208 vs median=165, 56:462, p=0.017) but not by grade of thrombocytopenia (median=0, 0:3 vs median=0, 0:3, p=0.987).

Lowest platelet count is significantly correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (RSpearman=-0.423, p=0.003), even after adjuting for total chemotherapy received (RSpearman=-0.249, p=0.091) and after adjuting for stage (RSpearman=-0.419, p=0.003).

On average, every additional neadjuvant chemotherapy cycle decreased the platelet count by 14.11** ±5.1 cells/mL. After adjusting for total chemotherapy received the average platelet count decreased by 14.41* ±6.3 cells/mL and after adjusting for stage, the average platelet count decreased by 17.85** ±6.0 cells/mL. When adjusting for both at the same time, the average platelet count decreased by 18.79* ±7.3 cells/mL.

2.6 Hemoglobin

NAC patients showed signifficantly lower hemoglobin (median=10.2, 8.7:11.9 vs median=11.6, 9:13.4, p=0.003) as well as a higher grade of anemia (median=1, 0:2 vs median=1, 0:2, p=0.025).

Lowest hemoglobin level is significantly correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (RSpearman=-0.484, p<0.001), even after adjuting for total chemotherapy received (RSpearman=-0.371, p=0.010) and after adjuting for stage (RSpearman=-0.001, p=0.031).

On average, every additional neadjuvant chemotherapy cycle decreased the hemoglobin level by 0.29*** ±0.08 cells/mL. After adjusting for total chemotherapy received the average hemoglobin level decreased by 0.25* ±0.10 cells/mL and after adjusting for stage, the average hemoglobin level decreased by 0.22* ±0.09 cells/mL. When adjusting for both at the same time, the average hemoglobin level decreased by 0.17 ±0.11 cells/mL (p<0.1).

2.7 Other toxicities

In both groups, 10% of the patients had elevated creatinin levels. Among cases, 31.6% had registered urinary toxicity grade 1 (none with grade 2) while among controls 31% had toxicity grade 1 and another patient had grade 2 (p=0.787).

Digestive toxicity grade > 0 were found in 68.4% on the NAT patients (with 15.8% grade 2) and 55.2% (with 10.3% grade 2) of the control patients (p=348). RT was given to Lombo-aortics in 47.4% of the NAC patients and 10.3% of the control patinents (OR=7.8, p=0.006).

2.8 Notes:

A patient had no record of stage and was removed form the analisys. Another patient had radiotherapy duration of 400 days and was left blank.

3 Results

Table. 1: Summary table for the group (NaC / control) by several predictors. Notice that several levels have been joined together.
Factor Levels Total Control NAC Statistics
1 Group 48 29 (60.4%) 19 (39.6%)
2 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Median (range) 0 (0:6) 0 (0:0) 4 (2:6) MW: p<0.001
3 Stage IB 1 (2.1%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0.0%) V=0.62 (p=0.003)
4 IIA 1 (2.1%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0.0%)
5 IIB 23 (47.9%) 20 (69.0%) 3 (15.8%)
6 IIIB 18 (37.5%) 6 (20.7%) 12 (63.2%)
7 IVA 3 (6.2%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (15.8%)
8 IVB 2 (4.2%) 1 (3.4%) 1 (5.3%)
9 Stage.numeric Median (range) 2.5 (1.5:4.5) 2.5 (1.5:4.5) 3.5 (2.5:4.5) MW: p<0.001
10 Dose Median (range) 40 (20:150) 40 (20:150) 40 (30:40) MW: p=0.027
11 Concomitant chemo cycles Median (range) 2 (1:5) 3 (1:5) 2 (1:4) MW: p=0.400
12 Lost cycles Median (range) 2 (0:4) 1 (0:4) 3 (1:4) MW: p<0.001
13 Total chemotherapy received Median (range) 0.6 (0.2:1) 0.6 (0.2:1) 0.4 (0.2:0.8) MW: p<0.001
14 Age Median (range) 53 (30:74) 53 (39:74) 54 (30:72) T-test: p=0.766
15 Age at diagnosis Median (range) 51.5 (29:72) 50 (36:72) 52 (29:71) T-test: p=0.672
16 Lowest Leucocyte count Median (range) 2470 (850:6310) 2510 (1080:5600) 2440 (850:6310) MW: p=0.393
17 Leucopenia grade Median (range) 2 (0:4) 2 (0:3) 2 (0:4) MW: p=0.250
18 Lowest Neutrophile count Median (range) 1645 (540:5190) 1690 (610:3970) 1590 (540:5190) MW: p=0.292
19 Neutropenia grade Median (range) 1 (0:3) 1 (0:3) 1 (0:3) MW: p=0.242
20 Lowest Lymphocyte count Median (range) 390 (70:950) 390 (150:660) 400 (70:950) MW: p=0.583
21 Lymphopenia grade Median (range) 3 (1:4) 3 (2:4) 3 (1:4) MW: p=0.381
22 Lowest Platelet count Median (range) 142.5 (36:462) 165 (56:462) 108 (36:208) MW: p=0.017
23 Thrombocytopenia grade Median (range) 0 (0:3) 0 (0:3) 0 (0:3) MW: p=0.987
24 Lowest Hemoglobin Median (range) 10.8 (8.7:13.4) 11.6 (9:13.4) 10.2 (8.7:12.9) T-test: p=0.003
25 Anemia grade Median (range) 1 (0:2) 1 (0:2) 1 (0:2) MW: p=0.025
26 Creatinin level elevated 5 (10.4%) 3 (10.3%) 2 (10.5%) OR=0.98 [0.15, 6.50] (p=1.000)
27 normal 43 (89.6%) 26 (89.7%) 17 (89.5%)
28 Urinary toxicity registered Median (range) 0 (0:2) 0 (0:2) 0 (0:1) MW: p=0.787
29 Digestive toxicity registered Median (range) 1 (0:2) 1 (0:2) 1 (0:2) MW: p=0.348
30 Type of fractination used 45/25 12 (25.0%) 6 (20.7%) 6 (31.6%) V=0.16 (p=0.526)
31 50.4/28 35 (72.9%) 22 (75.9%) 13 (68.4%)
32 50/25 1 (2.1%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0.0%)
33 RT given to LomboAortics yes 12 (25.0%) 3 (10.3%) 9 (47.4%) OR=7.80 [1.75, 34.83] (p=0.006)
34 Patient received Secvential Boost instead of SIB yes 6 (12.5%) 2 (6.9%) 4 (21.1%) OR=3.60 [0.59, 22.02] (p=0.197)
35 Brachytherapy fractions Median (range) 3 (0:4) 3.5 (0:4) 3 (0:4) MW: p=0.598
36 Radiotherapy duration (days) Median (range) 37 (32:72) 37 (32:42) 38 (32:72) MW: p=0.126
Note:
OR: Odds-Ratio with Wald 95% CI and p-value from Fisher test.
MW: Mann-Whitney test
V: Cramer V and p-value from Chi-square test

3.1 NAC ~ Stage

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  baza_de_date$`Neoadjuvant chemotherapy` and baza_de_date$Stage.numeric
## S = 8000, p-value = 0.00003
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##   rho 
## 0.562
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  Stage.numeric by Group
## W = 100, p-value = 0.00007
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Figure.  1: Correlation between Stage and the number of NaC cycles. Size reprezents number of patients. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. In NAC cases, median and IQR are at the IIIB level.

Figure. 1: Correlation between Stage and the number of NaC cycles. Size reprezents number of patients. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. In NAC cases, median and IQR are at the IIIB level.

3.2 NAC ~ Total chemotherapy received (fraction of planned total dose)

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  baza_de_date$`Neoadjuvant chemotherapy` and baza_de_date$`Total chemotherapy received`
## S = 30000, p-value = 0.000004
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##   rho 
## -0.61
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  Total chemotherapy received by Group
## W = 500, p-value = 0.00009
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Figure.  2: Correlation between Total chemotherapy received (fraction of planned total dose) and the number of NaC cycles. Size reprezents number of patients. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles.

Figure. 2: Correlation between Total chemotherapy received (fraction of planned total dose) and the number of NaC cycles. Size reprezents number of patients. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles.

3.3 NAC ~ Leucocytes

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  baza_de_date$`Neoadjuvant chemotherapy` and baza_de_date$`Lowest Leucocyte count`
## S = 20000, p-value = 0.1
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##    rho 
## -0.211
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  Lowest Leucocyte count by Group
## W = 300, p-value = 0.4
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Figure.  3: Correlation between Lowest Leucocyte count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of Leucopenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical Leucocyte tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Figure. 3: Correlation between Lowest Leucocyte count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of Leucopenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical Leucocyte tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Table. 2: Regression models of Lowest Leucocyte count by number of NaC cycles unadjusted and adjusted for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
  simple chemo stage interaction full superfull
Lowest Leucocyte count BY: Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates
(intercept) 2800.29 *** (204.09) 2005.27 ** (614.42) 779.76 (769.15) 1729.71 *** (448.48) 269.07 (892.96) 1696.10 (2494.18)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy -107.63 (85.42) -26.13 (103.43) -244.62 * (94.67) -39.75 (84.37) -174.24 (113.50) -142.46 (125.51)
Total chemotherapy received 1081.89 (789.56) 838.98 (751.10) -1152.63 (3333.73)
Stage 735.00 ** (271.00) 696.50 * (272.44) 198.86 (856.41)
(interaction) 524.59 * (198.60) 688.23 (1121.97)
Observations 48 48 48 48 48 48
R2 / adjusted R2 0.033 / 0.012 0.072 / 0.031 0.169 / 0.132 0.163 / 0.126 0.192 / 0.137 0.199 / 0.125
AIC 814.200 814.238 808.932 809.281 809.590 811.172
  • p<0.05   ** p<0.01   *** p<0.001
Table. 3: Correlations between number of NaC cycles and Lowest Leucocyte count, unadjusted and adjusted (partial correlations) for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
R Simple Chemo Stage Interaction
Pearson -0.183 -0.038 -0.359 -0.070
p=0.214 p=0.802 p=0.013 p=0.640
Spearman -0.211 -0.015 -0.409 -0.065
p=0.149 p=0.920 p=0.004 p=0.663
Figure.  4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic's p-value).

Figure. 4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic’s p-value).

3.4 NAC ~ Neutrophiles

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  baza_de_date$`Neoadjuvant chemotherapy` and baza_de_date$`Lowest Neutrophile count`
## S = 20000, p-value = 0.1
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##    rho 
## -0.235
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  Lowest Neutrophile count by Group
## W = 300, p-value = 0.3
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Figure.  5: Correlation between Lowest Neutrophile count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of neutropenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical neutrophile tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Figure. 5: Correlation between Lowest Neutrophile count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of neutropenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical neutrophile tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Table. 4: Regression models of Lowest Neutrophile count by number of NaC cycles unadjusted and adjusted for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
  simple chemo stage interaction full superfull
Lowest Neutrophile count BY: Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates
(intercept) 1996.44 *** (175.15) 948.43 (512.15) -56.62 (638.07) 805.91 * (364.08) -777.74 (720.58) -386.80 (2020.46)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy -95.20 (73.31) 12.22 (86.21) -234.40 ** (78.53) -19.72 (68.49) -135.03 (91.59) -126.32 (101.67)
Total chemotherapy received 1426.16 * (658.13) 1184.66 (606.10) 639.06 (2700.56)
Stage 746.83 ** (224.81) 692.47 ** (219.85) 556.15 (693.76)
(interaction) 583.37 *** (161.23) 188.54 (908.87)
Observations 48 48 48 48 48 48
R2 / adjusted R2 0.035 / 0.014 0.127 / 0.088 0.225 / 0.191 0.253 / 0.220 0.287 / 0.239 0.288 / 0.222
AIC 799.523 796.759 790.996 789.266 788.999 790.951
  • p<0.05   ** p<0.01   *** p<0.001
Table. 5: Correlations between number of NaC cycles and Lowest Neutrophile count, unadjusted and adjusted (partial correlations) for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
R Simple Chemo Stage Interaction
Pearson -0.188 0.021 -0.407 -0.043
p=0.201 p=0.888 p=0.005 p=0.775
Spearman -0.235 0.057 -0.423 -0.054
p=0.107 p=0.704 p=0.003 p=0.717
Figure.  4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic's p-value).

Figure. 4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic’s p-value).

3.5 NAC ~ Lymphocytes

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  baza_de_date$`Neoadjuvant chemotherapy` and baza_de_date$`Lowest Lymphocyte count`
## S = 20000, p-value = 0.6
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##    rho 
## 0.0774
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  Lowest Lymphocyte count by Group
## W = 200, p-value = 0.6
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Figure.  6: Correlation between Lowest Lymphocytes count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of lymphopenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical lymphocyte tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Figure. 6: Correlation between Lowest Lymphocytes count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of lymphopenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical lymphocyte tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Table. 2: Regression models of Lowest Leucocyte count by number of NaC cycles unadjusted and adjusted for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
  simple chemo stage interaction full superfull
Lowest Lymphocyte count BY: Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates
(intercept) 383.43 *** (26.54) 501.76 *** (79.38) 512.26 *** (106.04) 468.71 *** (61.08) 601.75 *** (122.03) 1194.43 *** (328.34)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 2.52 (11.11) -9.61 (13.36) 11.25 (13.05) -2.89 (11.49) -1.08 (15.51) 12.12 (16.52)
Total chemotherapy received -161.02 (102.00) -147.03 (102.65) -974.18 * (438.87)
Stage -46.86 (37.36) -40.11 (37.23) -246.79 * (112.74)
(interaction) -41.78 (27.05) 285.84 (147.70)
Observations 48 48 48 48 48 48
R2 / adjusted R2 0.001 / -0.021 0.054 / 0.011 0.035 / -0.008 0.051 / 0.009 0.078 / 0.015 0.152 / 0.073
AIC 618.363 617.776 618.713 617.882 618.526 616.517
  • p<0.05   ** p<0.01   *** p<0.001
Table. 5: Correlations between number of NaC cycles and Lowest Neutrophile count, unadjusted and adjusted (partial correlations) for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
R Simple Chemo Stage Interaction
Pearson 0.033 -0.107 0.127 -0.037
p=0.822 p=0.476 p=0.393 p=0.803
Spearman 0.077 -0.073 0.180 -0.022
p=0.601 p=0.627 p=0.225 p=0.884
Figure.  4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic's p-value).

Figure. 4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic’s p-value).

3.6 NAC ~ Platelets

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  baza_de_date$`Neoadjuvant chemotherapy` and baza_de_date$`Lowest Platelet count`
## S = 30000, p-value = 0.003
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##    rho 
## -0.423
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  Lowest Platelet count by Group
## W = 400, p-value = 0.02
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Figure.  7: Correlation between Lowest Platelets count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of Thrombocytopenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical Platelet tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Figure. 7: Correlation between Lowest Platelets count and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of Thrombocytopenia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical Platelet tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Table. 6: Regression models of Lowest Platelet count by number of NaC cycles unadjusted and adjusted for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
  simple chemo stage interaction full superfull
Lowest Platelet count BY: Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates
(intercept) 175.04 *** (12.17) 177.94 *** (37.38) 119.86 * (48.72) 161.79 *** (28.65) 126.64 * (57.33) 97.40 (160.76)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy -14.11 ** (5.09) -14.41 * (6.29) -17.85 ** (6.00) -13.27 * (5.39) -18.79 * (7.29) -19.44 * (8.09)
Total chemotherapy received -3.95 (48.04) -11.13 (48.22) 29.68 (214.87)
Stage 20.07 (17.17) 20.58 (17.49) 30.78 (55.20)
(interaction) 6.49 (12.69) -14.10 (72.31)
Observations 48 48 48 48 48 48
R2 / adjusted R2 0.143 / 0.124 0.143 / 0.105 0.168 / 0.131 0.148 / 0.110 0.169 / 0.113 0.170 / 0.093
AIC 543.493 545.486 544.057 545.214 545.998 547.956
  • p<0.05   ** p<0.01   *** p<0.001
Table. 5: Correlations between number of NaC cycles and Lowest Neutrophile count, unadjusted and adjusted (partial correlations) for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
R Simple Chemo Stage Interaction
Pearson -0.378 -0.323 -0.406 -0.345
p=0.008 p=0.027 p=0.005 p=0.018
Spearman -0.423 -0.249 -0.419 -0.340
p=0.003 p=0.091 p=0.003 p=0.019
Figure.  4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic's p-value).

Figure. 4: Correlation between Lowest Leucocytes count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Leucocytes tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic’s p-value).

3.7 NAC ~ Hemoglobin

## 
##  Spearman's rank correlation rho
## 
## data:  baza_de_date$`Neoadjuvant chemotherapy` and baza_de_date$`Lowest Hemoglobin`
## S = 30000, p-value = 0.0005
## alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0
## sample estimates:
##    rho 
## -0.484
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
## 
## data:  Lowest Hemoglobin by Group
## W = 400, p-value = 0.003
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Figure.  8: Correlation between Lowest Hemoglobin value and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of anemia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical hemoglobin tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Figure. 8: Correlation between Lowest Hemoglobin value and the number of NaC cycles. Grade of anemia highlighted. Boxplot by group. Control: no NAC cycles. Clinical hemoglobin tresholds marked by dotted blue line.

Table. 7: Regression models of Lowest Hemoglobin count by number of NaC cycles unadjusted and adjusted for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
  simple chemo stage interaction full superfull
Lowest Hemoglobin BY: Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates Estimates
(intercept) 11.26 *** (0.19) 10.87 *** (0.57) 12.28 *** (0.74) 11.24 *** (0.44) 11.87 *** (0.87) 14.72 *** (2.39)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy -0.29 *** (0.08) -0.25 * (0.10) -0.22 * (0.09) -0.29 ** (0.08) -0.17 (0.11) -0.10 (0.12)
Total chemotherapy received 0.54 (0.73) 0.68 (0.73) -3.30 (3.19)
Stage -0.37 (0.26) -0.40 (0.26) -1.39 (0.82)
(interaction) 0.01 (0.20) 1.37 (1.07)
Observations 48 48 48 48 48 48
R2 / adjusted R2 0.231 / 0.215 0.240 / 0.206 0.264 / 0.231 0.231 / 0.197 0.278 / 0.229 0.305 / 0.240
AIC 142.612 144.048 142.522 144.610 143.595 143.802
  • p<0.05   ** p<0.01   *** p<0.001
Table. 5: Correlations between number of NaC cycles and Lowest Neutrophile count, unadjusted and adjusted (partial correlations) for Total chemotherapy receiced and Stage.
R Simple Chemo Stage Interaction
Pearson -0.481 -0.362 -0.340 -0.462
p<0.001 p=0.012 p=0.019 p=0.001
Spearman -0.484 -0.371 -0.314 -0.483
p<0.001 p=0.010 p=0.031 p<0.001
Figure.  9: Correlation between Lowest Hemoglobin count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Hemoglobin tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic's p-value).

Figure. 9: Correlation between Lowest Hemoglobin count and the number of NaC cycles by Stage (left) and Total chemotherapy received as a fraction of planned total dose (right). Clinical Hemoglobin tresholds marked by dotted blue line. Statistics depict the Pearson correlation coefficient (with p-value) for the raw raltion, the partial corelaton by each covariate (with p-value) and the adjusted R-squared of a regression model with each covariate (with model F-statistic’s p-value).

3.8 NAC ~ Creatinin, Urinary, Digestive, RT to lombo-aortics

Figure.  10: Creatinin toxicity, Urinary and Digestive Toxicity, RT to lombo-aortics by Neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups

Figure. 10: Creatinin toxicity, Urinary and Digestive Toxicity, RT to lombo-aortics by Neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups

4 Results2

4.1 RT given to LomboAortics

Table. 8: Summary table for RT given to Lombo-aortics in NAC patients by several predictors.
Factor Levels Total no yes Statistics
1 19 10 (52.6%) 9 (47.4%)
2 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Median (range) 4 (2:6) 4 (2:6) 4 (2:5) MW: p=0.655
3 Stage IB 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
4 IIA 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
5 IIB 3 (15.8%) 2 (20.0%) 1 (11.1%)
6 IIIB 12 (63.2%) 7 (70.0%) 5 (55.6%)
7 IVA 3 (15.8%) 1 (10.0%) 2 (22.2%)
8 IVB 1 (5.3%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (11.1%)
9 Stage.numeric Median (range) 3.5 (2.5:4.5) 3.5 (2.5:4) 3.5 (2.5:4.5) MW: p=0.255
10 Age Median (range) 54 (30:72) 58 (37:72) 49 (30:69) T-test: p=0.146
11 Age at diagnosis Median (range) 52 (29:71) 57 (35:71) 48 (29:67) T-test: p=0.114
12 Dose Median (range) 40 (30:40) 40 (30:40) 40 (30:40) MW: p=1.000
13 Concomitant chemo cycles Median (range) 2 (1:4) 2.5 (1:4) 2 (1:3) MW: p=0.202
14 Lost cycles Median (range) 3 (1:4) 2.5 (1:4) 3 (2:4) MW: p=0.202
15 Total chemotherapy received Median (range) 0.4 (0.2:0.8) 0.5 (0.2:0.8) 0.4 (0.2:0.6) MW: p=0.202
16 Lowest Leucocyte count Median (range) 2440 (850:6310) 2375 (1640:3700) 2540 (850:6310) MW: p=0.905
17 Leucopenia grade Median (range) 2 (0:4) 2 (1:3) 2 (0:4) MW: p=0.795
18 Lowest Neutrophile count Median (range) 1590 (540:5190) 1520 (910:2810) 1770 (540:5190) MW: p=0.905
19 Neutropenia grade Median (range) 1 (0:3) 1.5 (0:3) 1 (0:3) MW: p=0.966
20 Lowest Lymphocyte count Median (range) 400 (70:950) 455 (380:950) 290 (70:410) MW: p<0.001
21 Lymphopenia grade Median (range) 3 (1:4) 3 (1:3) 3 (3:4) MW: p=0.030
22 Lowest Platelet count Median (range) 108 (36:208) 106.5 (85:198) 114 (36:208) T-test: p=0.957
23 Thrombocytopenia grade Median (range) 0 (0:3) 0 (0:1) 0 (0:3) MW: p=0.441
24 Lowest Hemoglobin Median (range) 10.2 (8.7:12.9) 10.35 (9.5:12.9) 10.1 (8.7:11.2) T-test: p=0.162
25 Anemia grade Median (range) 1 (0:2) 1 (0:2) 1 (1:2) MW: p=0.700
26 Creatinin level elevated 2 (10.5%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (22.2%) OR=0.14 [0.01, 3.43] (p=0.211)
27 normal 17 (89.5%) 10 (100.0%) 7 (77.8%)
28 Urinary toxicity registered Median (range) 0 (0:1) 0.5 (0:1) 0 (0:1) MW: p=0.085
29 Digestive toxicity registered Median (range) 1 (0:2) 1 (0:1) 1 (0:2) MW: p=0.444
30 Type of fractination used 45/25 6 (31.6%) 2 (20.0%) 4 (44.4%)
31 50.4/28 13 (68.4%) 8 (80.0%) 5 (55.6%)
32 50/25 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
33 Patient received Secvential Boost instead of SIB yes 4 (21.1%) 2 (20.0%) 2 (22.2%) OR=1.14 [0.13, 10.39] (p=1.000)
34 Brachytherapy fractions Median (range) 3 (0:4) 3 (0:4) 3.5 (0:4) MW: p=0.796
Note:
OR: Odds-Ratio with Wald 95% CI and p-value from Fisher test.
MW: Mann-Whitney test

vs. Group

Urinary toxicity registered

NAC

Control

(total)

0

13 (40.6%)

19 (59.4%)

32 (66.7%)

1

6 (40.0%)

9 (60.0%)

15 (31.2%)

2

0 (0.0%)

1 (100.0%)

1 (2.1%)

(total)

19 (39.6%)

29 (60.4%)

48 (100%)

V=0.12 (p=0.715)

vs. Group

Digestive toxicity registered

NAC

Control

(total)

0

6 (31.6%)

13 (68.4%)

19 (39.6%)

1

10 (43.5%)

13 (56.5%)

23 (47.9%)

2

3 (50.0%)

3 (50.0%)

6 (12.5%)

(total)

19 (39.6%)

29 (60.4%)

48 (100%)

V=0.14 (p=0.629)

## Warning in if (is.na(.or.ci)) .or.ci = "" else .or.ci = paste0(" [",
## scales::number(limit(.or.ci), : the condition has length > 1 and only the
## first element will be used
## Warning in if (is.na(.rr.ci)) .rr.ci = "" else .rr.ci = paste0(" [",
## scales::number(limit(.rr.ci), : the condition has length > 1 and only the
## first element will be used
## Warning in chisq.test(t): Chi-squared approximation may be incorrect

vs. Group

RT given to LomboAortics

NAC

Control

(total)

yes

9 (75.0%)

3 (25.0%)

12 (25.0%)

no

10 (27.8%)

26 (72.2%)

36 (75.0%)

(total)

19 (39.6%)

29 (60.4%)

48 (100%)

OR=7.80 [1.75, 34.83], RR=2.70 [1.50, 4.85], phi=0.42 (p=0.006)

5 extra

names(canva_palettes) %>% sort(decreasing = T)
##   [1] "Wintery reds"                              
##   [2] "Watery blue-greens"                        
##   [3] "Warm tones"                                
##   [4] "Warm naturals"                             
##   [5] "Warm and wonderful"                        
##   [6] "Warm and rustic"                           
##   [7] "Warm and cool"                             
##   [8] "Warm and bold"                             
##   [9] "Violet sunset"                             
##  [10] "Vintage charm 2"                           
##  [11] "Vintage charm"                             
##  [12] "Vineyard neutrals"                         
##  [13] "Urban oasis"                               
##  [14] "Urban living"                              
##  [15] "Unique and striking"                       
##  [16] "Unexpected color combinations"             
##  [17] "Understated and versatile"                 
##  [18] "Tropical tones"                            
##  [19] "Trendy and metropolitan"                   
##  [20] "Tints and tones"                           
##  [21] "Timeless and nautical"                     
##  [22] "Technology meets nature"                   
##  [23] "Surf and turf"                             
##  [24] "Sunset to dusk"                            
##  [25] "Sunny citrus"                              
##  [26] "Sunny and calm"                            
##  [27] "Sunkissed village"                         
##  [28] "Sun and sky"                               
##  [29] "Summer sunflower"                          
##  [30] "Summer inspired"                           
##  [31] "Summer fiesta"                             
##  [32] "Summer barbeque"                           
##  [33] "Subtle and versatile"                      
##  [34] "Subdued and proffesional"                  
##  [35] "Stylish and retro"                         
##  [36] "Striking and energetic"                    
##  [37] "Strawberries and cream"                    
##  [38] "Stormy hues"                               
##  [39] "Splash of color"                           
##  [40] "Spicy neutrals"                            
##  [41] "Smoky purples"                             
##  [42] "Sleek and modern"                          
##  [43] "Simple but bold"                           
##  [44] "Simple and fresh"                          
##  [45] "Sharp and modern"                          
##  [46] "Shadowy and dramatic"                      
##  [47] "Shades of citrus"                          
##  [48] "Shabby chic neutrals"                      
##  [49] "Serene and spa like"                       
##  [50] "Retro inspired"                            
##  [51] "Retro and relaxing"                        
##  [52] "Refreshing and pretty"                     
##  [53] "Professional and traditional"              
##  [54] "Professional and modern"                   
##  [55] "Primary colors with a vibrant twist"       
##  [56] "Pretty pastels"                            
##  [57] "Pop art"                                   
##  [58] "Pool party"                                
##  [59] "Polished and inviting"                     
##  [60] "Playful greens and blues"                  
##  [61] "Pastels"                                   
##  [62] "Outdoorsy and Natural"                     
##  [63] "Orange accent"                             
##  [64] "Nightlife"                                 
##  [65] "Neutral and versatile"                     
##  [66] "Neon tones and sharp contrast"             
##  [67] "Neon night"                                
##  [68] "Neon and bold"                             
##  [69] "Naturally elegant"                         
##  [70] "Muted tones"                               
##  [71] "Muted and minimal"                         
##  [72] "Muted and antique"                         
##  [73] "Modern and urban"                          
##  [74] "Modern and muted"                          
##  [75] "Modern and minimal"                        
##  [76] "Modern and crisp"                          
##  [77] "Modern and clean"                          
##  [78] "Misty greens"                              
##  [79] "Mediterranean afternoon"                   
##  [80] "Maritime brights"                          
##  [81] "Luxurious and modern"                      
##  [82] "Light and natural"                         
##  [83] "Lemonade stand"                            
##  [84] "Jewel tones"                               
##  [85] "Industrial and in control"                 
##  [86] "Icy blues and grays"                       
##  [87] "High saturation and high energy"           
##  [88] "Hazy grays"                                
##  [89] "Green fields"                              
##  [90] "Grecian holiday"                           
##  [91] "Golden afternoon"                          
##  [92] "Garden fresh"                              
##  [93] "Fun and tropical"                          
##  [94] "Fun and professional"                      
##  [95] "Fun and cheerful"                          
##  [96] "Fresh greens"                              
##  [97] "Fresh and lively"                          
##  [98] "Fresh and energetic"                       
##  [99] "Fresh and bright"                          
## [100] "Exotic and high impact"                    
## [101] "Elegant and sophisticated"                 
## [102] "Earthy and fresh"                          
## [103] "Distintive and unexpected"                 
## [104] "Day and night"                             
## [105] "Dark and handsome"                         
## [106] "Dark and earthy"                           
## [107] "Crisp complementary colors"                
## [108] "Crisp and dramatic"                        
## [109] "Cozy and warm"                             
## [110] "Cosmopolitan"                              
## [111] "Corporate and sleek"                       
## [112] "Cool vs warm"                              
## [113] "Cool jewel tones"                          
## [114] "Cool blues"                                
## [115] "Cool and calm"                             
## [116] "Colorful without clashing"                 
## [117] "Coastal"                                   
## [118] "Clean gradient and fresh blues"            
## [119] "Clean and highlighted"                     
## [120] "Clean and crisp"                           
## [121] "Clean and collegiate"                      
## [122] "Classy and timeless"                       
## [123] "Classic metallics"                         
## [124] "City sights"                               
## [125] "Chocolaty browns"                          
## [126] "Cheerful brights"                          
## [127] "Cheerful blues and pink"                   
## [128] "Cheerful and sleek"                        
## [129] "Cheerful and friendly"                     
## [130] "Candy coated brights"                      
## [131] "Bright and tropical"                       
## [132] "Bright and painterly"                      
## [133] "Bold feature colors"                       
## [134] "Bold blacks and vibrand highlights"        
## [135] "Bold berries"                              
## [136] "Bold and punchy"                           
## [137] "Bold and cultured"                         
## [138] "Bold and basic"                            
## [139] "Birds and berries"                         
## [140] "Beyond black and white"                    
## [141] "Berry blues"                               
## [142] "Back to school"                            
## [143] "Autumn oranges and complemtentary neutrals"
## [144] "Autumn in vermont"                         
## [145] "Artic sunrise"                             
## [146] "Art history inspired"                      
## [147] "Aqua blues"                                
## [148] "Antique tones"                             
## [149] "Antique and clean"                         
## [150] "1950s kitchen"
canva_df <- purrr::map2_df(canva_palettes, names(canva_palettes) ,
                    ~ tibble(colors = .x, .id = seq_along(colors),
                             palette = .y))

ggplot(canva_df, aes(y = palette, x = .id, fill = colors)) +
       geom_raster() +
       scale_fill_identity(guide = FALSE) +
       theme_minimal() +
       theme(panel.grid = element_blank(),
             axis.text.x = element_blank()) +
       labs(x = "", y = "")