Graded: 4.4, 4.14, 4.24, 4.26, 4.34, 4.40, 4.48
4.4 Heights of adults
Researchers studying anthropometry collected body girth measurements and skeletal diameter measurements, as well as age, weight, height and gender, for 507 physically active individuals. The histogram below shows the sample distribution of heights in centimeters.
Picture
b)What is the point estimate for the standard deviation of the heights of active individuals? What about the IQR?
x <- 180
mu <- 171.1
sigma <- 9.4
z <- (x - mu)/sigma
z
## [1] 0.9468085
Since z = 0.9468085 is < 2, 180 cm is not considered unusual.
x <- 155
mu <- 171.1
sigma <- 9.4
z <- (x - mu)/sigma
z
## [1] -1.712766
Since z = -1.71 is < 2, 155 cm is not considered unusual.
The results of the new sample would not be identical. The results of the new sample would be similar due to the samples represent the population.
\(SE=\frac { \sigma }{ \sqrt { n } } =\frac { 9.4 }{ 22.51666 } =0.42\)
4.14 Thanksgiving spending, Part I.
The 2009 holiday retail season, which kicked off on November 27, 2009 (the day after Thanksgiving), had been marked by somewhat lower self-reported consumer spending than was seen during the comparable period in 2008. To get an estimate of consumer spending, 436
randomly sampled American adults were surveyed. Daily consumer spending for the six-day period after Thanksgiving, spanning the Black Friday weekend and Cyber Monday, averaged $84.71. A 95% confidence interval based on this sample is ($80.31, $89.11). Determine whether the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.
Picture
False - the sample mean is always in the confidence level.
False - the confidence interval still can be valid even if the distribution is right or left skewed.
False- sample of different size may have different confidence level.
Yes, that’s true. The average spending of an average American adult is within the confidence interval with 95% of probability.
Yes, that’s True.
False,
\(SE=\frac { \sigma }{ \sqrt { n } }\) , so to decrease the margin of error of a 95% confidence interval to a third of what it is now, we would need to use a sample 9 times larger.
(89.11-80.31)/2
## [1] 4.4
True, The margin of error is 4.4.
4.24 Gifted children, Part I.
Researchers investigating characteristics of gifted children collected data from schools in a large city on a random sample of thirty-six children who were identified as gifted children soon after they reached the age of four. The following histogram shows the distribution of the ages (in months) at which these children first counted to 10 successfully. Also provided are some sample statistics.
Picture
Yes, conditions for inference satisfied: the children were randomly selected and independent of each other. The sample size is greater than 30, which is large enough. The graph is normally distributed and not obviously skewed.
\({ H }_{ 0 }\): \(\mu\)= 32 months.
\({ H }_{ A }\): \(\mu \neq32\) months.
\({ SE }_{ \overline { x } }=\frac { { s }_{ x } }{ \sqrt { n } } =\frac { 4.31 }{ \sqrt { 36 } }\)
##standard error
SE<- 4.31/sqrt(36)
SE
## [1] 0.7183333
\(Z=\frac { \overline { x } -null\quad value }{ SE_{ \overline { x } } } =\frac { 30.69-32 }{ 0.718 }\)
Z_score <- (30.69-32)/SE
Z_score
## [1] -1.823666
p_value <- pnorm(Z_score);
p_value
## [1] 0.0341013
p-value = 0.0341 < 0.1, we reject the null hypothesis.
lowerTail = 30.69 - 1.645 * SE
upperTail = 30.69 + 1.645 * SE
lowerTail
## [1] 29.50834
upperTail
## [1] 31.87166
Both results agree. Hypothesis test proves the alternative hypothesis (\({ H }_{ A }\): \(\mu \neq32\) months), as well as confidence interval shows that the mean age wouldn’t be more than 31.87.
4.26 Gifted children, Part II
Exercise 4.24 describes a study on gifted children. In this study, along with variables on the children, the researchers also collected data on the mother’s and father’s IQ of the 36 randomly sampled gifted children. The histogram below shows the distribution of mother’s IQ.
Picture
Perform a hypothesis test to evaluate if these data provide convincing evidence that the average IQ of mothers of gifted children is different than the average IQ for the population at large, which is 100. Use a significance level of 0.10
\({ H }_{ 0 }\): \(\mu\)= 100.
\({ H }_{ A }\): \(\mu \neq100\)
Z_score <- (118.2 - 100) / (6.5 / sqrt(36))
Z_score
## [1] 16.8
p_value <- 2 * (pnorm(Z_score, 0, 1, lower.tail = FALSE))
p_value
## [1] 2.44044e-63
lowerTail = 118.2 - 1.645 * (6.5 / sqrt(36))
upperTail = 118.2 + 1.645 * (6.5 / sqrt(36))
lowerTail
## [1] 116.4179
upperTail
## [1] 119.9821
The 90% Confidence interval is from 116.42 to 119.98
Do your results from the hypothesis test and the confidence interval agree? Explain.
Yes, agree and both support the rejecting of null hypothesis.
4.34 Central Limit Theorem
Define the term “sampling distribution” of the mean, and describe how the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of the mean change as sample size increases.
The sampling distribution is the probability distribution of the sample from the population.
As sample sizes increase, the sampling distributions approach a normal distribution. As sample sizes increase, the variability of each sampling distribution decreases.
4.40 CFLBs.
1 - pnorm(10500,mean=9000,sd=1000)
## [1] 0.0668072
Due to the population has normal distribution, the sample also would approximates normal distribution.
1-pnorm(10500,mean=9000,sd=258)
## [1] 3.050719e-09
xpopulation <- 7000:12000
ypopulation <- dnorm(xpopulation,mean=9000,sd=1000)
xsample <- 7000:12000
ysample <- dnorm(xsample,mean=9000,sd=1000/sqrt(15))
plot(xpopulation,ypopulation)
plot(xsample, ysample)
4.48 Same observation, different sample size
Suppose you conduct a hypothesis test based on a sample where the sample size is n = 50, and arrive at a p-value of 0.08. You then refer back to your notes and discover that you made a careless mistake, the sample size should have been n = 500. Will your p-value increase, decrease, or stay the same? Explain.
As the sample size increases, p-value decreases.
As sample sizes increase, the variability of each sampling distribution decreases as well as p-value gets smaller.