Abstract
Herpes zoster (shingles) is a painful, debilitating and sometimes dangerous re-activation of varicella zoster virus. Immunization against herpes zoster reduces the occurrence of the disease. This project employed a method to identify and opportunistically immunize eligible patients already booked to see health care providers for other reasons. During the six-week intervention (‘treatment’) period, immunization coverage improved by an estimated 8.9% (50.8% to 59.7%). The techniques used in this project are generalizable to other practice quality improvement activities.Shingles is a painful, debilitating and sometimes dangerous re-activation of varicella zoster virus. Although treatment is available for herpes zoster, particularly if detected early, immunization can reduce the risk of contracting the disease.
The currently available shingles vaccine in Australia, Zostavax, can reduce the incidence of herpes zoster in the 70-79 year year age group by 41%1 to 62%, and 70-88% reduction of postherpetic neuralgia2. Approximately 1 person per 100 per year contracts shingles, and 1 person per 1000 per year suffers from postherpetic neuralgia (pain persisting beyond 90 days from rash onset) in this age group.
Varicella immunization is recommended and funded by the Australian Government for people aged 70 years to reduce the risk of shingles (herpes zoster). Until 30 October 2021, a single catch-up dose is available for adults aged 71 to 79 years inclusive3.
The proportion of eligible 70-79 year olds who have been immunized against Zostavax had steadily increased to 50% of the target population at the Kensington site of coHealth, but had been static from June to September 2018. Weekly immunization proportions was static at 50% since early 2018, suggesting that without additional measures the immunization proportion was unlikely to significantly improve.
A semi-automated daily database search was used to case-find eligible patients who were already booked into see a healthcare provider during the intervention (‘treatment’) period from 27th September 2018 to 9th November 2018. The list of eligible patients was distributed to healthcare providers. During the treatment period itself, there was an estimated 8.9% (95% confidence interval 5.7% to 12%) increase in Zostavax immunization coverage among 200 eligible patients, equivalent to about 18 extra patients immunized against shingles. There was a tendency towards positive effects on Zostavax immunization coverage for two months after the end of the treatment period.
As approximately 50% of eligible patients each week seen at the practice left without a record of immunization, it was proposed that patients booked in each day are identified for potential Zostavax immunization eligibility.
A Best Practice SQL script which identifies non-immunized eligible patients is presented at the end of this document. Eligible patients were identified at the beginning of each day for a month, and reminders sent to clinicians (nurses and doctors) that these patients were eligible. This was done from 27th September 2018 to 9th November 2018 inclusive, the intervention (‘treatment’) period.
Modified variations of these tools can be used to identify patients for whom other health screening activities are recommended, and both measure and monitor practice performance in these activities. Examples include bowel cancer or cervical cancer screening, or early detection of chronic kidney disease among patients with diabetes.
Best Practice (up to February 2019) and PenCAT (up to June 2018) provide data of proportion of ‘active’ patients immunized against herpes zoster. Patients are defined as ‘active’ if they have three contacts over two years. Some ‘contacts’ may be trivial, e.g. correspondence and telephone contacts with third parties.
During the period January 2017 to March 2019, the number of active eligible patients increased at the Kensington site from 200 to 213 patients. During the same period, the number of active eligible patients at ‘Other (non-Kensington sites of coHealth)’ increased from 612 to 719 patients.
Weekly Doctor’s Control panel (DCP) data, August 2017 to February 2019, provides data of proportion of contacted patients immunized against herpes zoster. DCP data is weekly contact data, where a contact is defined as where a billing has occurred.
Full data and analysis R-code can be found on Github.
The proportion of active patients aged 70-79 years who have a record of shingles vaccination at each time period.
Main data source is extracted using SQL code in Best Practice4.
Proportion of patients recorded as having been immunized steadily increased from less than 15% in January 2017 to 50% in May 2018. Since May 2018, the proportion immunized remained steady/flat at 50% until September 2018.
The intervention (‘treatment’) period, 27th September to 9th November 2018 (44 days), is shaded in purple in the plots below.
Doctor’s Control Panel (DCP) reports weekly immunization patient data, based on age-eligible (70-79 years old) patients seen each week. The number of eligible patients seen each week is relatively small, accounting for the observed wide week-to-week variation in immunization coverage proportions.
Plot shows that by late 2017, 50% of age-eligible patients seen each week had been or were vaccinated against varicella zoster. This proportion had remained the same up to September 2018.
The plots above suggest the project increased the proportion of patients immunized during the study period, by a degree exceeding the previous increase in immunization rate in the few months prior to 2018. The increase in proportion of patients immunized also exceeded the rate of increased immunization proportion in other, comparable, coHealth medical clinics during the same time period.
A regression discontinuity plot of immunization proportion is shown below, centred around the middle of the intervention (‘treatment’) time period (2018-10-19), up to 100 days (approximately 3 months) before and after the middle of the treatment period, and not including immunization proportions during the treatment period itself (27th September to 9th November 2018).
Linear regression analysis, with interaction effects, shown in table below.
The ‘discontinuity’ of the Kensington vaccinated proportion at ‘day zero’ (2018-10-19) is significant, with a jump of 8.86% (standard error 1.44%, p-value 4.8e-05).
Following the treatment period, the rate of immunization coverage per month was non-inferior to prior to the intervention in the ‘200-day model’ (100 days prior to and after 2018-10-19). There was a tendency for the immunization proportion increase to be slightly better than pre-treatment immunization proportion increase (+1.32%/month, standard error 0.66%/month, p-value 0.07).
This positive tendency is negligible in the ‘270-day model’ (135 days prior to and after 2018-10-19), suggesting diminishing effect of the treatment, two months after the end of the treatment period.
| 200-day model | 270-day model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | Estimates | CI | p | Estimates | CI | p |
| (Intercept) | 0.4434 | 0.4271 – 0.4597 | <0.001 | 0.4447 | 0.4317 – 0.4578 | <0.001 |
| Months | 0.0090 | 0.0018 – 0.0162 | 0.018 | 0.0098 | 0.0052 – 0.0144 | <0.001 |
| Kensington Clinic | 0.0652 | 0.0421 – 0.0882 | <0.001 | 0.0624 | 0.0439 – 0.0808 | <0.001 |
| Post-treatment | -0.0126 | -0.0347 – 0.0095 | 0.239 | -0.0105 | -0.0276 – 0.0066 | 0.217 |
| Months X Kensington | -0.0089 | -0.0191 – 0.0012 | 0.080 | -0.0104 | -0.0169 – -0.0039 | 0.003 |
| Months X Post-treatment | -0.0047 | -0.0150 – 0.0055 | 0.332 | -0.0075 | -0.0135 – -0.0016 | 0.015 |
| Kensington X Post | 0.0886 | 0.0573 – 0.1199 | <0.001 | 0.1053 | 0.0811 – 0.1295 | <0.001 |
| Months X Kensington X Post | 0.0132 | -0.0012 – 0.0277 | 0.070 | 0.0066 | -0.0018 – 0.0150 | 0.117 |
| Observations | 20 | 30 | ||||
| R2 / adjusted R2 | 0.996 / 0.994 | 0.995 / 0.993 | ||||