	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
FALSE	54	171	151	150	151	160	145	157	155	138	154	172	164
TRUE	122	5	25	26	25	16	31	19	21	38	22	4	12

Crop rotation

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No effect on production	7	80	8.75%
		Production decreased	1		1.25%
		Production increased	71		88.75%
		Yes	1		1.25%
	male	No effect on production	10	110	9.09%
	male	Production increased	100	110	90.91%
Type 2	female	No effect on production	2	29	6.9%
	female	Production increased	27		93.1%
	male	No effect on production	4		13.79%
	male	Production increased	25		86.21%
Type 3	female	No effect on production	1	33	3.03%
	female	Production increased	32	33	96.97%
	male	No effect on production	1	34	2.94%
	male	Production increased	33	34	97.06%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	13	80	16.25%
	female	Yes	67	80	83.75%
	male	No	16	110	14.55%
	male	Yes	94	110	85.45%
Type 2	female	No	9	29	31.03%
	female	Yes	20		68.97%
	male	No	5		17.24%
	male	Yes	24		82.76%
Type 3	female	No	5	33	15.15%
	female	Yes	28	33	84.85%
	male	No	5	34	14.71%
	male	Yes	29	34	85.29%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	35	80	43.75%
	female	Yes	45	80	56.25%
	male	No	52	110	47.27%
	male	Yes	58	110	52.73%
Type 2	female	No	12	29	41.38%
	female	Yes	17		58.62%
	male	No	7		24.14%
	male	Yes	22		75.86%
Type 3	female	No	20	33	60.61%
	female	Yes	13	33	39.39%
	male	No	15	34	44.12%
	male	Yes	19	34	55.88%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	16	80	20%
	female	Yes	64	80	80%
	male	No	12	110	10.91%
	male	Yes	98	110	89.09%
Type 2	female	No	9	29	31.03%
	female	Yes	20		68.97%
	male	No	6		20.69%
	male	Yes	23		79.31%
Type 3	female	No	3	33	9.09%
	female	Yes	30	33	90.91%
	male	Yes	34	34	100%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	5	80	6.25%
	female	Yes	75	80	93.75%
	male	No	3	110	2.73%
	male	Yes	107	110	97.27%
Type 2	female	No	4	29	13.79%
	female	Yes	25		86.21%
	male	No	4		13.79%
	male	Yes	25		86.21%
Type 3	female	No	2	33	6.06%
	female	Yes	31	33	93.94%
	male	No	2	34	5.88%
	male	Yes	32	34	94.12%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	4	83	4.82%
		Yes, I decided alone	21		25.3%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	58		69.88%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	110	0.91%
		Yes, I decided alone	67		60.91%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	42		38.18%
Type 2	female	Yes, I decided alone	10	30	33.33%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	20		66.67%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1		3.33%
		Yes, I decided alone	16		53.33%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	13		43.33%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	3	37	8.11%
		Yes, I decided alone	14		37.84%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	20		54.05%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	2	35	5.71%
		Yes, I decided alone	19		54.29%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	14		40%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I did not do anyhing	3	83	3.61%
		No, I just helped	52		62.65%
		Yes, I did most	28		33.73%
	male	No, I just helped	22	110	20%
	male	Yes, I did most	88	110	80%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	30	3.33%
		No, I just helped	17		56.67%
		Yes, I did most	12		40%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1		3.33%
		No, I just helped	6		20%
		Yes, I did most	23		76.67%
Type 3	female	No, I did not do anyhing	4	37	10.81%
		No, I just helped	11		29.73%
		Yes, I did most	22		59.46%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	35	2.86%
		No, I just helped	9		25.71%
		Yes, I did most	25		71.43%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	10	80	12.5%
		Spent more time	34		42.5%
		The same amount of time	36		45%
	male	Spent less time	20	110	18.18%
		Spent more time	29		26.36%
		The same amount of time	61		55.45%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	3	29	10.34%
		Spent more time	10		34.48%
		The same amount of time	16		55.17%
	male	Spent less time	3		10.34%
		Spent more time	8		27.59%
		The same amount of time	18		62.07%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	4	33	12.12%
		Spent more time	16		48.48%
		The same amount of time	13		39.39%
	male	Spent less time	4	34	11.76%
		Spent more time	11		32.35%
		The same amount of time	19		55.88%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	11	67	16.42%
	female	Yes	56	67	83.58%
	male	No	7	94	7.45%
	male	Yes	87	94	92.55%
Type 2	female	No	3	20	15%
	female	Yes	17	20	85%
	male	No	1	24	4.17%
	male	Yes	23	24	95.83%
Type 3	female	No	3	28	10.71%
	female	Yes	25	28	89.29%
	male	No	3	29	10.34%
	male	Yes	26	29	89.66%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	2	3	66.67%
	female	Yes	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 2	female	No	1		100%
Type 2	male	No	1		100%
Type 3	female	No	4	4	100%
	male	No	1	2	50%
	male	Yes	1	2	50%

Improved varieties

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	I can?t say because it was new	2	60	3.33%
		No effect on production	3		5%
		Production decreased	1		1.67%
		Production increased	54		90%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	88	1.14%
		No effect on production	2		2.27%
		Production decreased	1		1.14%
		Production increased	84		95.45%
Type 2	female	I can?t say because it was new	1	18	5.56%
	female	Production increased	17	18	94.44%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	21	4.76%
	male	Production increased	20	21	95.24%
Type 3	female	Production decreased	1	25	4%
	female	Production increased	24	25	96%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	27	3.7%
		Production decreased	1		3.7%
		Production increased	25		92.59%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	17	60	28.33%
	female	Yes	43	60	71.67%
	male	No	25	88	28.41%
	male	Yes	63	88	71.59%
Type 2	female	No	7	18	38.89%
	female	Yes	11	18	61.11%
	male	No	9	21	42.86%
	male	Yes	12	21	57.14%
Type 3	female	No	2	26	7.69%
	female	Yes	24	26	92.31%
	male	No	7	27	25.93%
	male	Yes	20	27	74.07%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	36	60	60%
	female	Yes	24	60	40%
	male	No	46	88	52.27%
	male	Yes	42	88	47.73%
Type 2	female	No	9	18	50%
	female	Yes	9	18	50%
	male	No	5	20	25%
	male	Yes	15	20	75%
Type 3	female	No	12	26	46.15%
	female	Yes	14	26	53.85%
	male	No	15	27	55.56%
	male	Yes	12	27	44.44%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	12	60	20%
	female	Yes	48	60	80%
	male	No	18	86	20.93%
	male	Yes	68	86	79.07%
Type 2	female	No	11	18	61.11%
	female	Yes	7	18	38.89%
	male	No	8	20	40%
	male	Yes	12	20	60%
Type 3	female	No	4	26	15.38%
	female	Yes	22	26	84.62%
	male	No	2	27	7.41%
	male	Yes	25	27	92.59%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	5	60	8.33%
	female	Yes	55	60	91.67%
	male	No	3	86	3.49%
	male	Yes	83	86	96.51%
Type 2	female	No	1	18	5.56%
	female	Yes	17	18	94.44%
	male	No	1	21	4.76%
	male	Yes	20	21	95.24%
Type 3	female	No	1	26	3.85%
	female	Yes	25	26	96.15%
	male	Yes	27	27	100%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	3	60	5%
		Yes, I decided alone	9		15%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	48		80%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	4	90	4.44%
		Yes, I decided alone	47		52.22%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	39		43.33%
Type 2	female	Yes, I decided alone	4	18	22.22%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	14	18	77.78%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	22	4.55%
		Yes, I decided alone	12		54.55%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	9		40.91%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	26	3.85%
		Yes, I decided alone	12		46.15%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	13		50%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1		3.85%
		Yes, I decided alone	12		46.15%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	13		50%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I just helped	43	60	71.67%
	female	Yes, I did most	17	60	28.33%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	2	90	2.22%
		No, I just helped	18		20%
		Yes, I did most	70		77.78%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	19	5.26%
		No, I just helped	11		57.89%
		Yes, I did most	7		36.84%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	22	4.55%
		No, I just helped	4		18.18%
		Yes, I did most	17		77.27%
Type 3	female	No, I just helped	12	26	46.15%
	female	Yes, I did most	14	26	53.85%
	male	No, I just helped	7	27	25.93%
	male	Yes, I did most	20	27	74.07%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	12	60	20%
		Spent more time	21		35%
		The same amount of time	27		45%
	male	Spent less time	28	87	32.18%
		Spent more time	20		22.99%
		The same amount of time	39		44.83%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	4	18	22.22%
		Spent more time	5		27.78%
		The same amount of time	9		50%
	male	Spent less time	6	21	28.57%
		Spent more time	8		38.1%
		The same amount of time	7		33.33%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	5	26	19.23%
		Spent more time	10		38.46%
		The same amount of time	11		42.31%
	male	Spent less time	3	27	11.11%
		Spent more time	11		40.74%
		The same amount of time	13		48.15%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	8	42	19.05%
	female	Yes	34	42	80.95%
	male	No	4	61	6.56%
	male	Yes	57	61	93.44%
Type 2	female	No	1	10	10%
	female	Yes	9	10	90%
	male	No	1	12	8.33%
	male	Yes	11	12	91.67%
Type 3	female	No	5	24	20.83%
	female	Yes	19	24	79.17%
	male	No	2	20	10%
	male	Yes	18	20	90%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	3	3	100%
	male	No	2	5	40%
	male	Yes	3	5	60%
Type 2	female	No	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	1	100%
	male	No	1	2	50%
	male	Yes	1	2	50%

Integrated nutrient

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Production decreased	1	33	3.03%
	female	Production increased	32	33	96.97%
	male	No effect on production	2	45	4.44%
		Production decreased	1		2.22%
		Production increased	42		93.33%
Type 2	female	Production increased	4	4	100%
Type 2	male	Production increased	4	4	100%
Type 3	female	I can?t say because it was new	1	14	7.14%
	female	Production increased	13		92.86%
	male	Production decreased	1		7.14%
	male	Production increased	13		92.86%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	2	33	6.06%
	female	Yes	31	33	93.94%
	male	No	10	43	23.26%
	male	Yes	33	43	76.74%
Type 2	female	Yes	4	4	100%
Type 2	male	Yes	4	4	100%
Type 3	female	No	2	14	14.29%
	female	Yes	12		85.71%
	male	No	3		21.43%
	male	Yes	11		78.57%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	14	33	42.42%
	female	Yes	19	33	57.58%
	male	No	24	44	54.55%
	male	Yes	20	44	45.45%
Type 2	female	Yes	4	4	100%
	male	No	1		25%
	male	Yes	3		75%
Type 3	female	No	5	14	35.71%
	female	Yes	9		64.29%
	male	No	9		64.29%
	male	Yes	5		35.71%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	2	32	6.25%
	female	Yes	30	32	93.75%
	male	No	7	45	15.56%
	male	Yes	38	45	84.44%
Type 2	female	Yes	4	4	100%
	male	No	1		25%
	male	Yes	3		75%
Type 3	female	No	1	14	7.14%
	female	Yes	13		92.86%
	male	No	2		14.29%
	male	Yes	12		85.71%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	33	33	100%
	male	No	1	42	2.38%
	male	Yes	41	42	97.62%
Type 2	female	Yes	4	4	100%
	male	No	1		25%
	male	Yes	3		75%
Type 3	female	Yes	14	14	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	14	14	100%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes, I decided alone	10	32	31.25%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	22	32	68.75%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	45	2.22%
		Yes, I decided alone	32		71.11%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	12		26.67%
Type 2	female	Yes, I decided alone	3	4	75%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	1		25%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	1		25%
	male	Yes, it was a joint decision	3		75%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	2	16	12.5%
		Yes, I decided alone	6		37.5%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	8		50%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	15	6.67%
		Yes, I decided alone	5		33.33%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	9		60%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I just helped	20	33	60.61%
	female	Yes, I did most	13	33	39.39%
	male	No, I just helped	5	45	11.11%
	male	Yes, I did most	40	45	88.89%
Type 2	female	No, I just helped	1	4	25%
	female	Yes, I did most	3		75%
	male	No, I just helped	1		25%
	male	Yes, I did most	3		75%
Type 3	female	No, I did not do anyhing	2	16	12.5%
		No, I just helped	3		18.75%
		Yes, I did most	11		68.75%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	15	6.67%
		No, I just helped	6		40%
		Yes, I did most	8		53.33%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	4	32	12.5%
		Spent more time	25		78.12%
		The same amount of time	3		9.38%
	male	Spent less time	4	45	8.89%
		Spent more time	35		77.78%
		The same amount of time	6		13.33%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	1	4	25%
	female	Spent more time	3		75%
	male	Spent more time	1		25%
	male	The same amount of time	3		75%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	4	14	28.57%
		Spent more time	9		64.29%
		The same amount of time	1		7.14%
	male	Spent more time	13		92.86%
	male	The same amount of time	1		7.14%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	7	31	22.58%
	female	Yes	24	31	77.42%
	male	No	5	35	14.29%
	male	Yes	30	35	85.71%
Type 2	female	Yes	4	4	100%
	male	No	2		50%
	male	Yes	2		50%
Type 3	female	No	1	12	8.33%
	female	Yes	11	12	91.67%
	male	No	1	11	9.09%
	male	Yes	10	11	90.91%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	3	3	100%
Type 1	male	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 2	female	No	1	1	100%
Type 2	male	No	2	2	100%
Type 3	female	No	1	1	100%
Type 3	male	No	2	2	100%

Intercropping

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No effect on production	12	59	20.34%
		Production decreased	2		3.39%
		Production increased	45		76.27%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	2	72	2.78%
		No effect on production	19		26.39%
		Production decreased	1		1.39%
		Production increased	50		69.44%
Type 2	female	No effect on production	11	18	61.11%
		Production decreased	1		5.56%
		Production increased	6		33.33%
	male	No effect on production	9	22	40.91%
	male	Production increased	13	22	59.09%
Type 3	female	No effect on production	3	30	10%
		Production decreased	1		3.33%
		Production increased	26		86.67%
	male	No effect on production	4	27	14.81%
		Production decreased	1		3.7%
		Production increased	22		81.48%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	13	59	22.03%
	female	Yes	46	59	77.97%
	male	No	20	72	27.78%
	male	Yes	52	72	72.22%
Type 2	female	No	13	20	65%
	female	Yes	7	20	35%
	male	No	12	22	54.55%
	male	Yes	10	22	45.45%
Type 3	female	No	4	29	13.79%
	female	Yes	25	29	86.21%
	male	No	6	27	22.22%
	male	Yes	21	27	77.78%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	37	59	62.71%
	female	Yes	22	59	37.29%
	male	No	45	71	63.38%
	male	Yes	26	71	36.62%
Type 2	female	No	12	20	60%
	female	Yes	8	20	40%
	male	No	11	22	50%
	male	Yes	11	22	50%
Type 3	female	No	17	30	56.67%
	female	Yes	13	30	43.33%
	male	No	14	27	51.85%
	male	Yes	13	27	48.15%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	59	1.69%
	female	Yes	58	59	98.31%
	male	No	2	71	2.82%
	male	Yes	69	71	97.18%
Type 2	female	No	2	20	10%
	female	Yes	18	20	90%
	male	No	3	22	13.64%
	male	Yes	19	22	86.36%
Type 3	female	Yes	30	30	100%
	male	No	1	27	3.7%
	male	Yes	26	27	96.3%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	56	1.79%
	female	Yes	55	56	98.21%
	male	No	2	70	2.86%
	male	Yes	68	70	97.14%
Type 2	female	No	2	20	10%
	female	Yes	18	20	90%
	male	No	4	22	18.18%
	male	Yes	18	22	81.82%
Type 3	female	Yes	30	30	100%
	male	No	1	27	3.7%
	male	Yes	26	27	96.3%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	6	62	9.68%
		Yes, I decided alone	17		27.42%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	39		62.9%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	73	1.37%
		Yes, I decided alone	41		56.16%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	31		42.47%
Type 2	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	23	4.35%
		Yes, I decided alone	7		30.43%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	15		65.22%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	22	4.55%
		Yes, I decided alone	11		50%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	10		45.45%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	4	31	12.9%
		Yes, I decided alone	14		45.16%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	13		41.94%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	2	29	6.9%
		Yes, I decided alone	15		51.72%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	12		41.38%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I did not do anyhing	3	60	5%
		No, I just helped	36		60%
		Yes, I did most	21		35%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	73	1.37%
		No, I just helped	15		20.55%
		Yes, I did most	57		78.08%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	3	23	13.04%
		No, I just helped	11		47.83%
		Yes, I did most	9		39.13%
	male	No, I just helped	7	22	31.82%
	male	Yes, I did most	15	22	68.18%
Type 3	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	31	3.23%
		No, I just helped	12		38.71%
		Yes, I did most	18		58.06%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	2	28	7.14%
		No, I just helped	5		17.86%
		Yes, I did most	21		75%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	10	59	16.95%
		Spent more time	28		47.46%
		The same amount of time	21		35.59%
	male	Spent less time	10	70	14.29%
		Spent more time	29		41.43%
		The same amount of time	31		44.29%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	1	20	5%
		Spent more time	4		20%
		The same amount of time	15		75%
	male	Spent less time	3	22	13.64%
		Spent more time	6		27.27%
		The same amount of time	13		59.09%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	5	30	16.67%
		Spent more time	15		50%
		The same amount of time	10		33.33%
	male	Spent less time	1	26	3.85%
		Spent more time	17		65.38%
		The same amount of time	8		30.77%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	10	45	22.22%
	female	Yes	35	45	77.78%
	male	No	3	50	6%
	male	Yes	47	50	94%
Type 2	female	No	3	7	42.86%
	female	Yes	4	7	57.14%
	male	Yes	10	10	100%
Type 3	female	No	8	26	30.77%
	female	Yes	18	26	69.23%
	male	No	2	21	9.52%
	male	Yes	19	21	90.48%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	4	25%
	female	Yes	3	4	75%
	male	Yes	5	5	100%
Type 2	female	No	3	3	100%
Type 2	male	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 3	female	No	1	1	100%
	male	No	2	3	66.67%
	male	Yes	1	3	33.33%

Mulching

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Production increased	6	6	100%
	male	Production decreased	1	10	10%
		Production increased	9	10	90%
Type 2		Production increased	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	Production increased	1	1	100%
Type 3	male	Production increased	2	2	100%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	3	6	50%
	female	Yes	3	6	50%
	male	No	1	10	10%
		Yes	9	10	90%
Type 2		Yes	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	1	100%
	male	No	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes	2	3	66.67%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	2	6	33.33%
	female	Yes	4	6	66.67%
	male	No	5	10	50%
		Yes	5	10	50%
Type 2		Yes	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	1	100%
	male	No	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes	2	3	66.67%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	4	6	66.67%
	female	Yes	2	6	33.33%
	male	Yes	10	10	100%
Type 2	male	Yes	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	3	3	100%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	5	5	100%
Type 1	male	Yes	10	10	100%
Type 2	male	Yes	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	3	3	100%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	7	14.29%
		Yes, I decided alone	4		57.14%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	2		28.57%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	11	9.09%
		Yes, I decided alone	6		54.55%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	4		36.36%
Type 2	female	No I did not participate in the decision	2	2	100%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	2	3	66.67%
	male	Yes, it was a joint decision	1	3	33.33%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	2	50%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	1	2	50%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	3	3	100%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	7	14.29%
		No, I just helped	2		28.57%
		Yes, I did most	4		57.14%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	11	9.09%
	male	Yes, I did most	10	11	90.91%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	2	2	100%
Type 2	male	Yes, I did most	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	2	50%
	female	No, I just helped	1		50%
	male	Yes, I did most	2		100%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent more time	5	6	83.33%
	female	The same amount of time	1	6	16.67%
	male	Spent less time	1	10	10%
		Spent more time	9	10	90%
Type 2		Spent less time	1	3	33.33%
Type 2		Spent more time	2	3	66.67%
Type 3	female	Spent more time	1	1	100%
	male	Spent less time	1	3	33.33%
	male	Spent more time	2	3	66.67%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	2	3	66.67%
	female	Yes	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes	9	9	100%
Type 2		No	1	3	33.33%
Type 2		Yes	2	3	66.67%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	2	2	100%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	8	16	50%
	female	Yes	8	16	50%
	male	No	12	15	80%
	male	Yes	3	15	20%
Type 2	female	No	3	4	75%
	female	Yes	1	4	25%
	male	No	3	6	50%
	male	Yes	3	6	50%
Type 3	female	No	2	5	40%
	female	Yes	3	5	60%
	male	No	5	6	83.33%
	male	Yes	1	6	16.67%

No/reduced tillage

{r} valueBox("CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)", caption = " ", icon=" ")

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	I can?t say because it was new	1	42	2.38%
		No effect on production	9		21.43%
		Production decreased	1		2.38%
		Production increased	31		73.81%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	2	52	3.85%
		No effect on production	7		13.46%
		Production increased	43		82.69%
Type 2	female	I can?t say because it was new	1	8	12.5%
		No effect on production	4		50%
		Production decreased	1		12.5%
		Production increased	2		25%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	9	11.11%
		No effect on production	1		11.11%
		Production decreased	1		11.11%
		Production increased	6		66.67%
Type 3	female	I can?t say because it was new	1	11	9.09%
		No effect on production	1		9.09%
		Production increased	9		81.82%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	17	5.88%
		No effect on production	2		11.76%
		Production increased	14		82.35%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	8	41	19.51%
	female	Yes	33	41	80.49%
	male	No	14	51	27.45%
	male	Yes	37	51	72.55%
Type 2	female	No	4	7	57.14%
	female	Yes	3	7	42.86%
	male	No	3	9	33.33%
	male	Yes	6	9	66.67%
Type 3	female	No	1	11	9.09%
	female	Yes	10	11	90.91%
	male	No	2	17	11.76%
	male	Yes	15	17	88.24%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	19	42	45.24%
	female	Yes	23	42	54.76%
	male	No	31	52	59.62%
	male	Yes	21	52	40.38%
Type 2	female	No	5	8	62.5%
	female	Yes	3	8	37.5%
	male	No	1	9	11.11%
	male	Yes	8	9	88.89%
Type 3	female	No	5	11	45.45%
	female	Yes	6	11	54.55%
	male	No	6	17	35.29%
	male	Yes	11	17	64.71%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	12	42	28.57%
	female	Yes	30	42	71.43%
	male	No	6	50	12%
	male	Yes	44	50	88%
Type 2	female	No	1	8	12.5%
	female	Yes	7	8	87.5%
	male	No	2	9	22.22%
	male	Yes	7	9	77.78%
Type 3	female	No	2	11	18.18%
	female	Yes	9	11	81.82%
	male	No	2	16	12.5%
	male	Yes	14	16	87.5%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	4	42	9.52%
	female	Yes	38	42	90.48%
	male	No	5	52	9.62%
	male	Yes	47	52	90.38%
Type 2	female	Yes	8	8	100%
	male	No	1	9	11.11%
	male	Yes	8	9	88.89%
Type 3	female	Yes	11	11	100%
	male	No	1	17	5.88%
	male	Yes	16	17	94.12%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes, I decided alone	14	41	34.15%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	27	41	65.85%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	53	1.89%
		Yes, I decided alone	36		67.92%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	16		30.19%
Type 2	female	Yes, I decided alone	4	8	50%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	4	8	50%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	9	11.11%
		Yes, I decided alone	4		44.44%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	4		44.44%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	12	8.33%
		Yes, I decided alone	5		41.67%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	6		50%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	17	5.88%
		Yes, I decided alone	8		47.06%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	8		47.06%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I just helped	22	41	53.66%
	female	Yes, I did most	19	41	46.34%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	53	1.89%
		No, I just helped	2		3.77%
		Yes, I did most	50		94.34%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	9	11.11%
		No, I just helped	4		44.44%
		Yes, I did most	4		44.44%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	10	10%
		No, I just helped	2		20%
		Yes, I did most	7		70%
Type 3	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	12	8.33%
		No, I just helped	5		41.67%
		Yes, I did most	6		50%
	male	No, I just helped	3	17	17.65%
	male	Yes, I did most	14	17	82.35%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	25	41	60.98%
		Spent more time	10		24.39%
		The same amount of time	6		14.63%
	male	Spent less time	38	52	73.08%
		Spent more time	9		17.31%
		The same amount of time	5		9.62%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	3	8	37.5%
		Spent more time	4		50%
		The same amount of time	1		12.5%
	male	Spent less time	5	9	55.56%
	male	Spent more time	4	9	44.44%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	6	10	60%
		Spent more time	3		30%
		The same amount of time	1		10%
	male	Spent less time	13	17	76.47%
		Spent more time	3		17.65%
		The same amount of time	1		5.88%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	9	33	27.27%
	female	Yes	24	33	72.73%
	male	No	4	38	10.53%
	male	Yes	34	38	89.47%
Type 2	female	Yes	4	4	100%
	male	No	3	6	50%
	male	Yes	3	6	50%
Type 3	female	No	2	10	20%
	female	Yes	8	10	80%
	male	No	1	15	6.67%
	male	Yes	14	15	93.33%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	6	6	100%
	male	No	4	11	36.36%
	male	Yes	7	11	63.64%
Type 2	female	No	3	4	75%
	female	Yes	1	4	25%
	male	No	2	8	25%
	male	Yes	6	8	75%
Type 3	female	No	1	3	33.33%
	female	Yes	2		66.67%
	male	No	1		33.33%
	male	Yes	2		66.67%

Home gardens

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Production increased	5	5	100%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	12	8.33%
		Production decreased	2		16.67%
		Production increased	9		75%
Type 2		Production increased	2	2	100%
Type 3	female	Production increased	3	3	100%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	6	16.67%
		No effect on production	1		16.67%
		Production increased	4		66.67%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	5	20%
	female	Yes	4	5	80%
	male	No	3	12	25%
		Yes	9	12	75%
Type 2		Yes	2	2	100%
Type 3	female	Yes	2	2	100%
	male	No	1	6	16.67%
	male	Yes	5	6	83.33%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	5	5	100%
	male	No	4	12	33.33%
		Yes	8	12	66.67%
Type 2		Yes	2	2	100%
Type 3	female	No	1	3	33.33%
	female	Yes	2	3	66.67%
	male	No	3	6	50%
	male	Yes	3	6	50%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	4	4	100%
	male	No	1	12	8.33%
		Yes	11	12	91.67%
Type 2		No	1	2	50%
Type 2		Yes	1		50%
Type 3	female	Yes	2		100%
	male	No	2	6	33.33%
	male	Yes	4	6	66.67%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	5	20%
	female	Yes	4	5	80%
	male	No	1	12	8.33%
		Yes	11	12	91.67%
Type 2		No	1	2	50%
Type 2		Yes	1	2	50%
Type 3	female	Yes	3	3	100%
	male	No	2	6	33.33%
	male	Yes	4	6	66.67%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	6	16.67%
		Yes, I decided alone	2		33.33%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	3		50%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	2	14	14.29%
		Yes, I decided alone	9		64.29%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	3		21.43%
Type 2		No I did not participate in the decision	1	3	33.33%
Type 2		Yes, I decided alone	2		66.67%
Type 3	female	Yes, I decided alone	2		66.67%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	1		33.33%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	3	7	42.86%
	male	Yes, it was a joint decision	4	7	57.14%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	5	20%
		No, I just helped	1		20%
		Yes, I did most	3		60%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	2	14	14.29%
		No, I just helped	2		14.29%
		Yes, I did most	10		71.43%
Type 2		No, I did not do anyhing	1	3	33.33%
Type 2		Yes, I did most	2		66.67%
Type 3	female	Yes, I did most	3		100%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	7	14.29%
		No, I just helped	2		28.57%
		Yes, I did most	4		57.14%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	1	5	20%
		Spent more time	1		20%
		The same amount of time	3		60%
	male	Spent less time	3	12	25%
		Spent more time	4		33.33%
		The same amount of time	5		41.67%
Type 2		The same amount of time	2	2	100%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	1	3	33.33%
	female	The same amount of time	2	3	66.67%
	male	Spent more time	3	6	50%
	male	The same amount of time	3	6	50%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	4	25%
	female	Yes	3	4	75%
	male	No	2	9	22.22%
		Yes	7	9	77.78%
Type 2		No	1	2	50%
Type 2		Yes	1		50%
Type 3	female	No	1		50%
	female	Yes	1		50%
	male	No	1	5	20%
	male	Yes	4	5	80%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	1	100%
Type 1	male	No	1	1	100%
Type 2		No	1	2	50%
Type 2		Yes	1		50%
Type 3	female	No	1		50%
	female	Yes	1		50%
	male	No	2		100%

Organic fertilizer

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No effect on production	2	75	2.67%
	female	Production increased	73	75	97.33%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	1	98	1.02%
		No effect on production	5		5.1%
		Production decreased	1		1.02%
		Production increased	91		92.86%
Type 2	female	No effect on production	3	25	12%
	female	Production increased	22	25	88%
	male	No effect on production	1	22	4.55%
		Production decreased	1		4.55%
		Production increased	20		90.91%
Type 3	female	Production increased	25	25	100%
Type 3	male	Production increased	26	26	100%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	12	75	16%
	female	Yes	63	75	84%
	male	No	18	97	18.56%
	male	Yes	79	97	81.44%
Type 2	female	No	10	27	37.04%
	female	Yes	17	27	62.96%
	male	No	9	23	39.13%
	male	Yes	14	23	60.87%
Type 3	female	No	1	24	4.17%
	female	Yes	23	24	95.83%
	male	No	6	26	23.08%
	male	Yes	20	26	76.92%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	34	74	45.95%
	female	Yes	40	74	54.05%
	male	No	55	98	56.12%
	male	Yes	43	98	43.88%
Type 2	female	No	15	25	60%
	female	Yes	10	25	40%
	male	No	11	23	47.83%
	male	Yes	12	23	52.17%
Type 3	female	No	14	25	56%
	female	Yes	11	25	44%
	male	No	13	24	54.17%
	male	Yes	11	24	45.83%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	26	74	35.14%
	female	Yes	48	74	64.86%
	male	No	33	98	33.67%
	male	Yes	65	98	66.33%
Type 2	female	No	13	26	50%
	female	Yes	13	26	50%
	male	No	10	23	43.48%
	male	Yes	13	23	56.52%
Type 3	female	No	3	25	12%
	female	Yes	22	25	88%
	male	No	4	26	15.38%
	male	Yes	22	26	84.62%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	5	75	6.67%
	female	Yes	70	75	93.33%
	male	No	8	99	8.08%
	male	Yes	91	99	91.92%
Type 2	female	No	4	27	14.81%
	female	Yes	23	27	85.19%
	male	No	4	23	17.39%
	male	Yes	19	23	82.61%
Type 3	female	Yes	24	24	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	26	26	100%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	75	1.33%
		Yes, I decided alone	20		26.67%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	54		72%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	2	99	2.02%
		Yes, I decided alone	52		52.53%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	45		45.45%
Type 2	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	27	3.7%
		Yes, I decided alone	8		29.63%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	18		66.67%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	2	25	8%
		Yes, I decided alone	12		48%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	11		44%
Type 3	female	Yes, I decided alone	13		52%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	12		48%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	27	3.7%
		Yes, I decided alone	16		59.26%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	10		37.04%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I just helped	40	74	54.05%
	female	Yes, I did most	34	74	45.95%
	male	No, I just helped	31	97	31.96%
	male	Yes, I did most	66	97	68.04%
Type 2	female	No, I just helped	14	26	53.85%
	female	Yes, I did most	12	26	46.15%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	2	24	8.33%
		No, I just helped	4		16.67%
		Yes, I did most	18		75%
Type 3	female	No, I just helped	9		37.5%
	female	Yes, I did most	15		62.5%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1		4.17%
		No, I just helped	4		16.67%
		Yes, I did most	19		79.17%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	7	76	9.21%
		Spent more time	57		75%
		The same amount of time	12		15.79%
	male	Spent less time	11	99	11.11%
		Spent more time	70		70.71%
		The same amount of time	18		18.18%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	2	27	7.41%
		Spent more time	21		77.78%
		The same amount of time	4		14.81%
	male	Spent less time	2	22	9.09%
		Spent more time	17		77.27%
		The same amount of time	3		13.64%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	5	25	20%
		Spent more time	18		72%
		The same amount of time	2		8%
	male	Spent less time	2		8%
		Spent more time	18		72%
		The same amount of time	5		20%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	7	64	10.94%
	female	Yes	57	64	89.06%
	male	No	9	82	10.98%
	male	Yes	73	82	89.02%
Type 2	female	No	2	17	11.76%
	female	Yes	15	17	88.24%
	male	No	2	14	14.29%
	male	Yes	12	14	85.71%
Type 3	female	No	2	24	8.33%
	female	Yes	22	24	91.67%
	male	No	3	20	15%
	male	Yes	17	20	85%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	9	9	100%
	male	No	6	10	60%
	male	Yes	4	10	40%
Type 2	female	No	2	4	50%
	female	Yes	2	4	50%
	male	No	1	8	12.5%
	male	Yes	7	8	87.5%
Type 3	female	No	5	6	83.33%
	female	Yes	1	6	16.67%
	male	No	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes	2	3	66.67%

Tree planting

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	I can?t say because it was new	7	43	16.28%
		No effect on production	6		13.95%
		Production decreased	1		2.33%
		Production increased	29		67.44%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	7	62	11.29%
		No effect on production	13		20.97%
		Production increased	42		67.74%
Type 2	female	I can?t say because it was new	2	13	15.38%
		No effect on production	6		46.15%
		Production increased	5		38.46%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	4	18	22.22%
		No effect on production	3		16.67%
		Production decreased	1		5.56%
		Production increased	10		55.56%
Type 3	female	I can?t say because it was new	3	17	17.65%
		No effect on production	1		5.88%
		Production increased	13		76.47%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	4		23.53%
		No effect on production	2		11.76%
		Production increased	11		64.71%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	13	42	30.95%
	female	Yes	29	42	69.05%
	male	No	25	61	40.98%
	male	Yes	36	61	59.02%
Type 2	female	No	6	12	50%
	female	Yes	6	12	50%
	male	No	7	18	38.89%
	male	Yes	11	18	61.11%
Type 3	female	No	4	17	23.53%
	female	Yes	13	17	76.47%
	male	No	5	18	27.78%
	male	Yes	13	18	72.22%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	28	43	65.12%
	female	Yes	15	43	34.88%
	male	No	40	62	64.52%
	male	Yes	22	62	35.48%
Type 2	female	No	10	13	76.92%
	female	Yes	3	13	23.08%
	male	No	9	17	52.94%
	male	Yes	8		47.06%
Type 3	female	No	9		52.94%
	female	Yes	8		47.06%
	male	No	9	18	50%
	male	Yes	9	18	50%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	11	41	26.83%
	female	Yes	30	41	73.17%
	male	No	10	60	16.67%
	male	Yes	50	60	83.33%
Type 2	female	No	2	12	16.67%
	female	Yes	10	12	83.33%
	male	No	4	18	22.22%
	male	Yes	14	18	77.78%
Type 3	female	No	2	16	12.5%
	female	Yes	14	16	87.5%
	male	No	5	18	27.78%
	male	Yes	13	18	72.22%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	6	43	13.95%
	female	Yes	37	43	86.05%
	male	No	7	61	11.48%
	male	Yes	54	61	88.52%
Type 2	female	No	1	13	7.69%
	female	Yes	12	13	92.31%
	male	Yes	18	18	100%
Type 3	female	No	2	17	11.76%
	female	Yes	15	17	88.24%
	male	No	1	18	5.56%
	male	Yes	17	18	94.44%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	2	42	4.76%
		Yes, I decided alone	12		28.57%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	28		66.67%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	61	1.64%
		Yes, I decided alone	45		73.77%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	15		24.59%
Type 2	female	No I did not participate in the decision	3	15	20%
		Yes, I decided alone	6		40%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	6		40%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	13	17	76.47%
	male	Yes, it was a joint decision	4	17	23.53%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	18	5.56%
		Yes, I decided alone	9		50%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	8		44.44%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	2	20	10%
		Yes, I decided alone	10		50%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	8		40%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	44	2.27%
		No, I just helped	28		63.64%
		Yes, I did most	15		34.09%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	61	1.64%
		No, I just helped	5		8.2%
		Yes, I did most	55		90.16%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	2	15	13.33%
		No, I just helped	7		46.67%
		Yes, I did most	6		40%
	male	No, I just helped	1	18	5.56%
	male	Yes, I did most	17		94.44%
Type 3	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1		5.56%
		No, I just helped	9		50%
		Yes, I did most	8		44.44%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	2	20	10%
		No, I just helped	4		20%
		Yes, I did most	14		70%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	9	42	21.43%
		Spent more time	29		69.05%
		The same amount of time	4		9.52%
	male	Spent less time	5	60	8.33%
		Spent more time	50		83.33%
		The same amount of time	5		8.33%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	2	13	15.38%
		Spent more time	10		76.92%
		The same amount of time	1		7.69%
	male	Spent more time	15	17	88.24%
	male	The same amount of time	2	17	11.76%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	3	15	20%
		Spent more time	10		66.67%
		The same amount of time	2		13.33%
	male	Spent more time	14	17	82.35%
	male	The same amount of time	3	17	17.65%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	11	30	36.67%
	female	Yes	19	30	63.33%
	male	No	5	35	14.29%
	male	Yes	30	35	85.71%
Type 2	female	No	2	6	33.33%
	female	Yes	4	6	66.67%
	male	No	1	11	9.09%
	male	Yes	10	11	90.91%
Type 3	female	No	2	13	15.38%
	female	Yes	11	13	84.62%
	male	No	2	12	16.67%
	male	Yes	10	12	83.33%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	14	16	87.5%
	female	Yes	2	16	12.5%
	male	No	5	21	23.81%
	male	Yes	16	21	76.19%
Type 2	female	No	8	11	72.73%
	female	Yes	3	11	27.27%
	male	No	2	8	25%
	male	Yes	6	8	75%
Type 3	female	No	5	7	71.43%
	female	Yes	2	7	28.57%
	male	No	6	8	75%
	male	Yes	2	8	25%

Water (earth bund)

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Production increased	8	8	100%
	male	Production decreased	1	23	4.35%
	male	Production increased	22	23	95.65%
Type 2	female	Production increased	2	2	100%
Type 2	male	Production increased	8	8	100%
Type 3	female	Production increased	2	2	100%
Type 3	male	Production increased	3	3	100%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	2	10	20%
	female	Yes	8	10	80%
	male	No	12	22	54.55%
	male	Yes	10	22	45.45%
Type 2	female	No	2	2	100%
	male	No	2	8	25%
	male	Yes	6	8	75%
Type 3	female	No	1	2	50%
	female	Yes	1	2	50%
	male	No	2	3	66.67%
	male	Yes	1	3	33.33%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	4	10	40%
	female	Yes	6	10	60%
	male	No	4	22	18.18%
	male	Yes	18	22	81.82%
Type 2	female	Yes	2	2	100%
Type 2	male	Yes	7	7	100%
Type 3	female	No	1	2	50%
	female	Yes	1		50%
	male	Yes	2		100%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	4	10	40%
	female	Yes	6	10	60%
	male	No	15	23	65.22%
	male	Yes	8	23	34.78%
Type 2	female	No	2	2	100%
	male	No	5	8	62.5%
	male	Yes	3	8	37.5%
Type 3	female	Yes	2	2	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	3	3	100%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	10	10%
	female	Yes	9	10	90%
	male	No	1	22	4.55%
	male	Yes	21	22	95.45%
Type 2	female	Yes	2	2	100%
	male	No	1	8	12.5%
	male	Yes	7	8	87.5%
Type 3	female	Yes	2	2	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	3	3	100%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes, I decided alone	5	10	50%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	5	10	50%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	3	23	13.04%
		Yes, I decided alone	14		60.87%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	6		26.09%
Type 2	female	No I did not participate in the decision	3	4	75%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	1	4	25%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	6	8	75%
	male	Yes, it was a joint decision	2	8	25%
Type 3	female	Yes, I decided alone	1	1	100%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	2	3	66.67%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I just helped	6	10	60%
	female	Yes, I did most	4	10	40%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	24	4.17%
		No, I just helped	5		20.83%
		Yes, I did most	18		75%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	2	4	50%
	female	No, I just helped	2	4	50%
	male	No, I just helped	2	8	25%
	male	Yes, I did most	6	8	75%
Type 3	female	No, I just helped	1	2	50%
	female	Yes, I did most	1	2	50%
	male	Yes, I did most	3	3	100%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	1	9	11.11%
		Spent more time	5		55.56%
		The same amount of time	3		33.33%
	male	Spent less time	3	23	13.04%
		Spent more time	17		73.91%
		The same amount of time	3		13.04%
Type 2	female	Spent more time	2	2	100%
	male	Spent more time	5	6	83.33%
	male	The same amount of time	1	6	16.67%
Type 3	female	Spent more time	2	2	100%
Type 3	male	Spent more time	3	3	100%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	8	8	100%
	male	No	3	10	30%
		Yes	7	10	70%
Type 2		No	1	6	16.67%
Type 2		Yes	5	6	83.33%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 3	male	Yes	1	1	100%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	9	9	100%
	male	No	2	10	20%
	male	Yes	8	10	80%
Type 2	female	No	7	7	100%
	male	No	2	5	40%
	male	Yes	3	5	60%
Type 3	female	No	2	4	50%
	female	Yes	2	4	50%
	male	Yes	3	3	100%

Water (planting pits)

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Production increased	1	1	100%
Type 1	male	Production increased	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	No effect on production	1	2	50%
Type 3	female	Production increased	1	2	50%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	1	1	100%
	male	No	2	3	66.67%
	male	Yes	1	3	33.33%
Type 3	female	Yes	2	2	100%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	1	1	100%
	male	No	2	3	66.67%
	male	Yes	1	3	33.33%
Type 3	female	No	2	2	100%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	1	1	100%
	male	No	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes	2	3	66.67%
Type 3	female	Yes	2	2	100%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 1	male	Yes	3	3	100%
Type 3	female	Yes	2	2	100%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes, I decided alone	1	2	50%
	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	1	2	50%
	male	Yes, I decided alone	3	3	100%
Type 2	female	No I did not participate in the decision	1	1	100%
Type 3	female	Yes, it was a joint decision	2	2	100%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	2	50%
	female	No, I just helped	1	2	50%
	male	Yes, I did most	3	3	100%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	1	1	100%
Type 3	female	No, I just helped	2	2	100%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent more time	1	1	100%
Type 1	male	Spent more time	2	2	100%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	1		50%
Type 3	female	Spent more time	1		50%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 1	male	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 3	female	No	1	2	50%
Type 3	female	Yes	1	2	50%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	2	3	66.67%
	female	Yes	1	3	33.33%
	male	No	2	4	50%
		Yes	2	4	50%
Type 2		No	1	2	50%
Type 2		Yes	1	2	50%

Water (ties ridges)

Row

CSA perceived effects (gender dissagregated not HH level)

Row

Effect on production

Type	gender	get(produccion[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	I can?t say because it was new	2	69	2.9%
		No effect on production	7		10.14%
		Production decreased	2		2.9%
		Production increased	58		84.06%
	male	No effect on production	11	96	11.46%
		Production decreased	2		2.08%
		Production increased	83		86.46%
Type 2	female	I can?t say because it was new	1	28	3.57%
		No effect on production	9		32.14%
		Production increased	18		64.29%
	male	I can?t say because it was new	2	29	6.9%
		No effect on production	5		17.24%
		Production increased	22		75.86%
Type 3	female	Production increased	30	30	100%
	male	No effect on production	2	25	8%
	male	Production increased	23	25	92%

Row

Effect on Aditional income generation

Type	gender	get(adiocional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	20	68	29.41%
	female	Yes	48	68	70.59%
	male	No	36	100	36%
	male	Yes	64	100	64%
Type 2	female	No	17	28	60.71%
	female	Yes	11	28	39.29%
	male	No	11	29	37.93%
	male	Yes	18	29	62.07%
Type 3	female	No	3	30	10%
	female	Yes	27	30	90%
	male	No	7	29	24.14%
	male	Yes	22	29	75.86%

Row

Effect on Food security

Type	gender	get(security[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	26	67	38.81%
	female	Yes	41	67	61.19%
	male	No	44	99	44.44%
	male	Yes	55	99	55.56%
Type 2	female	No	14	28	50%
	female	Yes	14	28	50%
	male	No	10	30	33.33%
	male	Yes	20	30	66.67%
Type 3	female	No	14	31	45.16%
	female	Yes	17	31	54.84%
	male	No	12	30	40%
	male	Yes	18	30	60%

Row

Effect on Food diversity

Type	gender	get(diversity[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	11	68	16.18%
	female	Yes	57	68	83.82%
	male	No	20	97	20.62%
	male	Yes	77	97	79.38%
Type 2	female	No	9	28	32.14%
	female	Yes	19	28	67.86%
	male	No	11	30	36.67%
	male	Yes	19	30	63.33%
Type 3	female	No	3	31	9.68%
	female	Yes	28	31	90.32%
	male	No	1	30	3.33%
	male	Yes	29	30	96.67%

Row

Effect on climate resilience

Type	gender	get(resilience[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	3	68	4.41%
	female	Yes	65	68	95.59%
	male	No	8	98	8.16%
	male	Yes	90	98	91.84%
Type 2	female	No	3	27	11.11%
	female	Yes	24	27	88.89%
	male	No	1	30	3.33%
	male	Yes	29	30	96.67%
Type 3	female	No	2	31	6.45%
	female	Yes	29	31	93.55%
	male	No	2	30	6.67%
	male	Yes	28	30	93.33%

Row

Gender

Row

who participates in the decision to implement?

Type	gender	get(decision[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No I did not participate in the decision	5	75	6.67%
		Yes, I decided alone	23		30.67%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	47		62.67%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	1	99	1.01%
		Yes, I decided alone	68		68.69%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	30		30.3%
Type 2	female	No I did not participate in the decision	4	29	13.79%
		Yes, I decided alone	8		27.59%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	17		58.62%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	2	30	6.67%
		Yes, I decided alone	22		73.33%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	6		20%
Type 3	female	No I did not participate in the decision	4	34	11.76%
		Yes, I decided alone	14		41.18%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	16		47.06%
	male	No I did not participate in the decision	3	31	9.68%
		Yes, I decided alone	18		58.06%
		Yes, it was a joint decision	10		32.26%

Row

Level of participation in practice implementation

Type	gender	get(participation[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No, I did not do anyhing	6	74	8.11%
		No, I just helped	44		59.46%
		Yes, I did most	24		32.43%
	male	No, I just helped	13	97	13.4%
	male	Yes, I did most	84	97	86.6%
Type 2	female	No, I did not do anyhing	2	30	6.67%
		No, I just helped	18		60%
		Yes, I did most	10		33.33%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	1	31	3.23%
		No, I just helped	8		25.81%
		Yes, I did most	22		70.97%
Type 3	female	No, I did not do anyhing	3	33	9.09%
		No, I just helped	12		36.36%
		Yes, I did most	18		54.55%
	male	No, I did not do anyhing	2	31	6.45%
		No, I just helped	7		22.58%
		Yes, I did most	22		70.97%

Row

Impact on labour

Type	gender	get(Impact[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	Spent less time	13	69	18.84%
		Spent more time	40		57.97%
		The same amount of time	16		23.19%
	male	Spent less time	25	100	25%
		Spent more time	54		54%
		The same amount of time	21		21%
Type 2	female	Spent less time	9	28	32.14%
		Spent more time	13		46.43%
		The same amount of time	6		21.43%
	male	Spent less time	6	30	20%
		Spent more time	19		63.33%
		The same amount of time	5		16.67%
Type 3	female	Spent less time	7	31	22.58%
		Spent more time	19		61.29%
		The same amount of time	5		16.13%
	male	Spent less time	5	29	17.24%
		Spent more time	17		58.62%
		The same amount of time	7		24.14%

Row

Participatin in decision making on the use of additional CSA income

Type	gender	get(additional[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	7	48	14.58%
	female	Yes	41	48	85.42%
	male	No	3	63	4.76%
	male	Yes	60	63	95.24%
Type 2	female	No	4	11	36.36%
	female	Yes	7	11	63.64%
	male	Yes	18	18	100%
Type 3	female	No	5	28	17.86%
	female	Yes	23	28	82.14%
	male	Yes	21	21	100%

Row

Participatin in decision making relating to dis-adoption

Type	gender	get(disadoption[i])	n	N	Porcentaje
Type 1	female	No	5	8	62.5%
	female	Yes	3	8	37.5%
	male	Yes	1	1	100%
Type 2	female	No	2	2	100%
	male	No	1		50%
	male	Yes	1		50%
Type 3	female	No	2	4	50%
	female	Yes	2	4	50%
	male	No	1	3	33.33%
	male	Yes	2	3	66.67%