Both distributions look fairly normal with slight skew.
Yes, the data appears to follow a nearly normal distribution
sim_norm
. Do all of the points fall on the line? How does this plot compare to the probability plot for the real data?This plot looks similar to the plot for the real data, having points that closely follow the line, but with points deviating from the line towards the tails.
set.seed(2112)
sim_norm <- rnorm(n = length(fdims$hgt), mean = fhgtmean, sd = fhgtsd)
qqnorm(sim_norm)
qqline(sim_norm)
fdims$hgt
look similar to the plots created for the simulated data? That is, do plots provide evidence that the female heights are nearly normal?Yes, the plots look similar to the plots created by the simulated data
It appears weight is skewed right, diverging from the normal distribution
What is the probability that a random female is shorter than 150cm?
What is the probability that a random female is heavier than 68kg?
## [1] 0.01152955
## [1] 0.2207879
a. This corresponds to plot B
b. This corresponds to plot C
c. This corresponds to plot D
d. This corresponds to plot A
Note that normal probability plots C and D have a slight stepwise pattern.
Why do you think this is the case? This could be caused by values being rounded
Make a normal probability plot for female knee diameter (kne.di
). Based on this normal probability plot, is this variable left skewed, symmetric, or right skewed? Use a histogram to confirm your findings. This variable is right skewed