The security and stability of public transportation are always the most concerned issues. As a kind of networks, what will happen if some stations are destroyed due to natural disasters or terrorist attacks? We could concern in two ways. First, the general view of the whole system would be the change of the cost from one station to another. Second, the stations might be entirely separated to multiple groups of stations even if they still work well.
Also, as the graph theory, the removement of nodes could be in two ways, which are node attack and node failure. We could concerned node attack as intentionally attacks to the system, node failure as a random shutdown of some stations in the system.
What is the change of the cost when the network of Tokyo Metro system experiences a sequence of node attacks and node failures?
What is the change of the remaining passengers’ in connections when the network of Tokyo Metro experiences a sequence of node attacks and node failures ?
The data was all web-crawled from Tokyo Metro websites, including the stations, lines, average passengers of each station in 2017.
The nodes represent the stations. The stations connected in lines represent the edges, only the previous and next stations would be concerned as edges.
(*Kokkai-gijidomae and Tameike-sanno are concerned as one node(station) in the data of Tokyo Metro.)
Fig.1. Tokyo Metro Network
Step 1. Find the node(s) with highest degree. (Original)
Step 2. Remove the node with highest average passengers among them.
\[E(G)=\frac{1}{n(n-1)}\sum_{i\neq j\in{G}}\bigg(\frac{1}{d(i,j)}\bigg)\]
\[E_{glob}(G)=\frac{E(G)}{E(G^{ideal})}\]
\[CP_{k}=\sum_{i\in{C_{k}}}(Popu_{i})\]
\[LCP(G)=\max_{C_{k}\in{G}}{CP_{k}}\]
- Network Figure
Fig.2. Node Attack on the network
Fig.3. Node Failure on the network
- Example of the component with largest amount of passengers during node attack and node failure.
Fig.4. Comparison.
We could easily see the difference on the speed of change. Node attack could decrease the largest amoint of passengers in connections faster, by removing transfer stations and separating the system.
Since the node failure is by random, we should run many times to get the average result. Following is the comparison of \(LCP\) and \(E_{glob}\), during the sequences of node attack and average of node failure (1000 times).
- Comparison of LCP and global efficiency
Fig.5. Ratio of Largest Connected Passengers.
Fig.6. Global Efficiency.
In conclusion, we can say that the network of the Tokyo Metro system is more vulnerable to node attacks, no matter from the perspectives of the cost (global efficeincy) or passengers in connections. In the real life, this implies the Tokyo Metro system might be influenced more in the shutdown of the transfer stations.
Back to our previous course, we also know that the scale-free network is more fragile to node attacks. Although there are some differences between theory and reality, we could also know that the Tokyo Metro system shared some characteristics with the scale-free network.
路線・駅の情報.(2018, December 29th). Retrieved from https://www.tokyometro.jp/station/index.html
各駅の乗降人員ランキング.(2018, December 29th). Retrieved from https://www.tokyometro.jp/corporate/enterprise/passenger_rail/transportation/passengers/index.html
Traffic Performance by Station.(2018, December 29th). Retrieved from https://www.tokyometro.jp/lang_en/corporate/enterprise/transportation/ranking/index.html
Wikipedia - Efficiency (network science).(2018, July 26th). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency_(network_science)