This analysis looks at the extrapolation of current Exascalar trends based on the most recent analysis of the Top500 and Green500 lists.
Code for this analysis is available in the Exascalar GitHub Repository
The analysis shows that “Day Zero” for Exascalar, that date when Exascalar of the Top System is expected to be equal to zero, is now in early 2020. The date has pushed out from 2019 primarily because the Top system has not changed for the last two years.
Interestingly, the population median and TopGreen system show following as similar improvement trend, suggesting a strong correlation between the median and computing efficiency improvement.
## pdf
## 2
At the current trend the Exascalar “Day zero” is now projected to be 2020-01-07, a somewhat fictitious date when Exscalar will cross the “Zero Line.” Note that this data has been pushing out recently as the Exascalar for the top supercomputer has not changed in the last two years. It shoudl be noted that the Top Exascalar and the Top Performance systems are for the most part identical (the only exceptions being several years ago).
At “Day zero” the Median Exascalar, assuming it follows the current trend, will be -2.86 and the Exascalar of the Top Green supercomputer will be -2.02, again assuming the current trend is followed.
Interestingly the slope of the TopGreen Exascalar line 0.233 parts per per year, with a standard error of 0.026 is close to the slope of the median 0.222 with standard error of 0.004, the difference 0.012 having a t-statistic of 0.4486.
If we were to propose a hypothesis that the slopes of the median and TopGreen lines were different (with a null hypothesis that the slopes are the same) we would not reject the null hypothesis.
This is the list of computers comprising the Top Exascalar list. Note that the Top Performance system corresponds to the top Exascalar system is almost all cases.
## date ExaRank green500rank top500rank exascalar rmax mflopswatt
## 2009-06-01 1 4 1 -3.541 1105000 444.9400
## 2009-11-01 1 6 2 -3.559 1042000 444.2500
## 2010-06-01 1 4 2 -3.466 1271000 492.6400
## 2010-11-01 1 11 1 -3.173 2566000 635.1500
## 2011-06-01 1 6 1 -2.737 8162000 824.5644
## 2011-11-01 1 32 1 -2.657 10510000 830.1800
## 2012-06-01 1 20 1 -2.242 16324751 2069.0432
## 2012-11-01 1 3 1 -2.208 17590000 2142.7701
## 2013-06-01 1 32 1 -2.044 33862700 1901.5442
## 2013-11-01 1 40 1 -2.044 33862700 1901.5442
## 2014-06-01 1 49 1 -2.044 33862700 1901.5400
## 2014-11-01 1 64 1 -2.044 33862700 1901.5442
The Top Green system list shows some interesting behavior. As you’d expect, since the power of the most efficient system is independent of its efficiency, the performance shows high variablity.
## date ExaRank green500rank top500rank exascalar rmax mflopswatt
## 2009-06-01 50 1 422 -4.738 18570 536.240
## 2009-11-01 23 1 110 -4.388 43010 722.980
## 2010-06-01 26 1 131 -4.357 44500 773.380
## 2010-11-01 15 1 115 -4.000 65347 1684.200
## 2011-06-01 15 1 109 -3.849 85880 2097.192
## 2011-11-01 15 1 64 -3.645 172494 2026.480
## 2012-06-01 57 1 252 -3.847 86346 2100.876
## 2012-11-01 63 1 251 -3.713 112200 2499.443
## 2013-06-01 65 1 467 -3.676 98511 3208.827
## 2013-11-01 57 1 311 -3.499 125100 4503.181
## 2014-06-01 61 1 437 -3.447 151800 4389.820
## 2014-11-01 34 1 168 -3.181 301300 5271.814
This variablity is shown in the plot below of the Exascalar Rank and the Top500 (Performance) rank of the Top Green systems. While a correlation is evident, what is surprising is that the popluation appears to be bimodal, with two apparent populations. Note also that while performance rank range across a wide range, the range of exascalar is much narrower. This is expected. Since Exascalar combines efficiency and performance, higher efficiency systems are favored over lower efficiency systems with equivalent performance, hence accounting for better Exascalar rank.
## pdf
## 2
A plot of the Top Green (Highest efficiency) systems for the last several years. While no trend with date is apparent, the correlation of Exascalar ranking and Top500 ranking is as expected.
This is the list of “Median” systems (those with Exascalar rank of 250). Note that, as expected, the performance (rmax) and efficiency (mflopswatt) are somewhat erratic. Nevertheless, the median trend of exascalar is consistent. Recall from above the standard error of the fitted line 0.004 is small compared to the slope 0.222.
## date ExaRank green500rank top500rank exascalar rmax mflopswatt
## 2009-06-01 250 311 136 -5.216 32231.00 65.2600
## 2009-11-01 250 191 347 -5.116 24670.00 118.0400
## 2010-06-01 250 255 168 -4.984 39128.30 114.3500
## 2010-11-01 250 445 54 -4.882 122400.00 51.0000
## 2011-06-01 250 132 470 -4.770 41312.70 217.2980
## 2011-11-01 250 289 240 -4.671 69987.03 177.0200
## 2012-06-01 250 268 220 -4.572 92234.00 185.7684
## 2012-11-01 250 197 261 -4.401 109906.00 271.2858
## 2013-06-01 250 397 119 -4.327 251800.00 150.7081
## 2013-11-01 250 257 202 -4.235 197801.00 259.1732
## 2014-06-01 250 233 272 -4.129 190900.00 378.7700
## 2014-11-01 250 201 426 -3.988 163669.00 700.3980