Suppose that you wanted to investigate whether there is a gender difference in musical preference among Plymouth State University students. To investigate this question, you took a small sample of PSU students. The sample data is stored in music.csv.
Import music.csv from Moodle under Date Files, and test the hypothesis as described as below.
# Load packages
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(infer)
# Import data
music <- read.csv("/resources/rstudio/BusinessStatistics/Data/music03.csv")
14 male students prefer Imagine Dragons
music %>%
# Count the rows by singer and sex
count(sex, singer)
## # A tibble: 4 x 3
## sex singer n
## <fct> <fct> <int>
## 1 female Dragons 1
## 2 female Grande 3
## 3 male Dragons 14
## 4 male Grande 2
Interpretation
87% of males prefer Imagine Dragons
# Find proportion of each sex who were Dragons
music %>%
# Group by sex
group_by(sex) %>%
# Calculate proportion Dragons summary stat
summarise(Dragons_prop = mean(singer == "Dragons"))
## # A tibble: 2 x 2
## sex Dragons_prop
## <fct> <dbl>
## 1 female 0.25
## 2 male 0.875
Interpretation
There is a .625 differnece or, 62% difference in proportions between male and female.
This means male students are more likely to prefer Imagine Dragons tahn female studnets by 62%
The negative difference means that the females preference is higher than the males because when you calculate propoertions the formula is male-female
# Calculate the observed difference in promotion rate
diff_orig <- music %>%
# Group by sex
group_by(sex) %>%
# Summarize to calculate fraction Dragons
summarise(prop_prom = mean(singer == "Dragons")) %>%
# Summarize to calculate difference
summarise(stat = diff(prop_prom)) %>%
pull()
# See the result
diff_orig # male - female
## [1] 0.625
# Create data frame of permuted differences in promotion rates
music_perm <- music %>%
# Specify variables: singer (response variable) and sex (explanatory variable)
specify(singer ~ sex, success = "Dragons") %>%
# Set null hypothesis as independence: there is no gender musicrimination
hypothesize(null = "independence") %>%
# Shuffle the response variable, singer, one thousand times
generate(reps = 1000, type = "permute") %>%
# Calculate difference in proportion, male then female
calculate(stat = "diff in props", order = c("male", "female")) # male - female
music_perm
## # A tibble: 1,000 x 2
## replicate stat
## <int> <dbl>
## 1 1 0.312
## 2 2 0.625
## 3 3 0
## 4 4 -0.312
## 5 5 0
## 6 6 -0.312
## 7 7 -0.312
## 8 8 0
## 9 9 0
## 10 10 0
## # ... with 990 more rows
# Using permutation data, plot stat
ggplot(music_perm, aes(x = stat)) +
# Add a histogram layer
geom_histogram(binwidth = 0.01) +
# Using original data, add a vertical line at stat
geom_vline(aes(xintercept = diff_orig), color = "red")
Interpretation (no need to revise)
The calucalted p-value is.7%
Being that it is .7% it shows that is highly unlikely to see the observed difference by chance if there was no difference across gender. We would reject the null hypothesis being that it is highly less than 5%, and males are much likely to prefer imagine dragons than females are.
# Calculate the p-value for the original dataset
music_perm %>%
get_p_value(obs_stat = diff_orig, direction = "greater")
## # A tibble: 1 x 1
## p_value
## <dbl>
## 1 0.034
Interpretation