Suppose that you wanted to investigate whether there is a gender difference in musical preference among Plymouth State University students. To investigate this question, you took a small sample of PSU students. The sample data is stored in music.csv.
Import music.csv from Moodle under Date Files, and test the hypothesis as described as below.
# Load packages
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(infer)
# Import data
music <- read.csv("/resources/rstudio/BusinessStatistics/data//music (1).csv")
head(music)
## singer sex
## 1 Dragons male
## 2 Dragons male
## 3 Dragons male
## 4 Dragons male
## 5 Dragons male
## 6 Dragons male
Answer: There are 12 male students that prefer Imagine Dragons
music %>%
# Count the rows by singer and sex
count(sex, singer)
## # A tibble: 4 x 3
## sex singer n
## <fct> <fct> <int>
## 1 female Dragons 4
## 2 female Grande 10
## 3 male Dragons 12
## 4 male Grande 3
Interpretation
Answer: 80% of male students reported to prefer imagine dragons
# Find proportion of each sex who were Dragons
music %>%
# Group by sex
group_by(sex) %>%
# Calculate proportion Dragons summary stat
summarise(Dragons_prop = mean(singer == "Dragons"))
## # A tibble: 2 x 2
## sex Dragons_prop
## <fct> <dbl>
## 1 female 0.286
## 2 male 0.8
Interpretation
Answer: There is a 0.5142857 difference, or 51% difference in proportions between males and females.
Answer: It means that male students are more likely to prefer Imangine Dragons than female students do by 51%.
Answer: The negative difference means that the females preference is higher than the males because when you calculate differene in proportions, the formula is male-female
# Calculate the observed difference in promotion rate
diff_orig <- music %>%
# Group by sex
group_by(sex) %>%
# Summarize to calculate fraction Dragons
summarise(prop_prom = mean(singer == "Dragons")) %>%
# Summarize to calculate difference
summarise(stat = diff(prop_prom)) %>%
pull()
# See the result
diff_orig # male - female
## [1] 0.5142857
# Create data frame of permuted differences in promotion rates
music_perm <- music %>%
# Specify variables: singer (response variable) and sex (explanatory variable)
specify(singer ~ sex, success = "Dragons") %>%
# Set null hypothesis as independence: there is no gender musicrimination
hypothesize(null = "independence") %>%
# Shuffle the response variable, singer, one thousand times
generate(reps = 1000, type = "permute") %>%
# Calculate difference in proportion, male then female
calculate(stat = "diff in props", order = c("male", "female")) # male - female
music_perm
## # A tibble: 1,000 x 2
## replicate stat
## <int> <dbl>
## 1 1 -0.0381
## 2 2 0.376
## 3 3 -0.0381
## 4 4 -0.0381
## 5 5 0.100
## 6 6 0.238
## 7 7 -0.314
## 8 8 0.100
## 9 9 -0.176
## 10 10 -0.176
## # ... with 990 more rows
# Using permutation data, plot stat
ggplot(music_perm, aes(x = stat)) +
# Add a histogram layer
geom_histogram(binwidth = 0.01) +
# Using original data, add a vertical line at stat
geom_vline(aes(xintercept = diff_orig), color = "red")
Interpretation (no need to revise)
Answer: The calculated p-value is .007 or .7%
Answer: Being that it is .007 or .7%, it shows that it is highly unlikely to see the observed difference by chance if there was no difference across gender. We would reject the null hypothesis being that it is highly less than 5%, and that males are much more likely to prefer imagine dragons, than women are.
# Calculate the p-value for the original dataset
music_perm %>%
get_p_value(obs_stat = diff_orig, direction = "greater")
## # A tibble: 1 x 1
## p_value
## <dbl>
## 1 0.01
Interpretation