Analysis of Pre-Post clinical research data

Introduction and methodology

In this experiment participant levels of tCBFP were measured before and after a treatment. Participants were grouped by whether the treatment was deemed successful (SR) or not (AF). A linear mixed model (LMM) was used to estimate the treatment effect as well as any difference in effect between the two groups. The LMM was fitted according to the formula

\[ Y_{ij} = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X_i + \beta_2 t_{ij} + \beta_3 t_{ij} X_i + \epsilon_{ij}, \]

where \(Y_{ij}\) is the j’th measurement for subject i, \(X_i\) is the treatment group of subject i, and \(t_ij\) indicates whether \(Y_{ij}\) is a pre- or post measurement for subject i.

Pre post change

Change in tCBFP for each group


Table 2 below shows the estimated change in tCBFP for both groups (AF and SR) along with 95% confidence intervals and p-values. In the SR group, the change is significantly positive with a confidence interval pointing to values between 0 and 9.5. As for the AF group, the change is not significant and the confidence interval is wide, containing both large negative and large positive numbers.

Table 2: Significance test for overall change in tCBFP.
95% Confidence Interval
Contrast Group Estimate Lower Upper p
Post - Pre SR Group 4.788 0.108 9.468 0.045
Post - Pre AF Group -1.581 -7.795 4.634 0.604

Difference in pre-post change between groups


Table 3 below shows the estimated difference in pre-post change between participants whose treatment was deemed a failure (AF) and those whose treatment was successful (SR). Even though the difference is not significant at the \(\alpha = 0.05\) level the confidence interval seems to insinuate a larger change for the SR group.


Table 3: Significance test for difference in change between groups.
95% Confidence Interval
Contrast Estimate Lower Upper p
AF - SR -6.369 -13.738 1 0.103

Residuals


Figures 2 and 3 shows that model residuals follow a normal distribution as expected but there are signs of uneven variance conditioned on fitted values.

Figure 2: Distribution of LMM residuals.

Figure 2: Distribution of LMM residuals.

Figure 3: Distribution of LMM residuals conditioned on predicted value.

Figure 3: Distribution of LMM residuals conditioned on predicted value.