This document is intended to display the vertification of Dr Walker’s initial draft uncertainty analysis. Using calibration data provided by DOI via USGS, USACE and SFWMD identical methods were applied to these data to verifiy values of reported in Appendix A of Walker 2018


Data Sources

Field measurements of instantaneous water level and discharge are available for the S-12s (S-12 A, B, C and D) and retrieved from USGS NWIS. Field measurements and rating curve information was provided by USGS (via DOI) for the L-31N Mile-1 flow monitoring location. Published rating curves are only available for the S12 structures and were retrieve from USGS NWIS. Rated and calculated flow measurements for S-333, S-334 and S-356 were provided by SFWMD.

Methods

The stage-discharge relationship (i.e. rating curve) was applied to instantaneous water level measurements to determine an Rated Instantons Flow value which was compared with the measured flow value. The uncertainty analysis focused on field collected data during the period of the most recent rating curve as identified below. Consistent with Walker (2018), linear models were fit to measured and rated instantaneous flow values for each structure using the lm() function in the base R-package. Using the output provided by the linear model, error associated with the slope of the model was estimated using the standard error of the slope term and the slope value calculated as a percent (Eq. 1). This slope error term is considered the low-estimate of error. Error attributed to the model via the residual errors (measured flow - rated flow) using the models residual standard error and the mean measured value (\(\overline{Q_{m}}\); Eq. 2). Finally, total error (or high-estimate) incorporates error associated with the slope and residuals (Eq. 3).

\[ Slope\ SE\ (\%) = \frac{Slope\ Standard\ Error}{Slope} \times 100 \qquad \qquad \text{(Eq. 1)} \] \[ Model\ RSE\ (\%) = \frac{Residual\ Standard\ Error}{\overline{Q_{m}}} \times 100 \qquad \qquad \text{(Eq. 2)} \] \[ Total\ Error\ (\%) = \sqrt{Slope\ SE^{2} + Model\ RSE^{2}} \qquad \qquad \text{(Eq. 3)}\]

Notes:

1 Linear models were fit to S-12s and L-31N Mile-1 where slope and intercept values were estimated.

2 Error terms associated with S-333, S-334 and S-356 were derived using liner models with an x-intercept (\(\beta_{0}\)) set to zero.

3 Limited field measurement data was available for S-356, however it is assumed that error is relatively low from this structure given that flow is estimated from pump rate (RPMs) versus discharge.


Flow Calibration Uncertainty Results

S-12A

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.947
Intercept -16.72
Slope Standard Error 0.035
0.97
Residual Standard Error 36.71
F-Statistic 742.9
DOF 26
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data from USGS Site ID: 254543080491101 (Link to data)
3 Rating curve for Federal Water Year 2008 - 2017 (Link to data)




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instantaneous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2008 - 2017.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 36.71 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 316.9 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) 68.5 - 850 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) 150.4 - 999 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 11.6 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.035 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 3.7 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 12.2 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 1.008 0.947
Intercept -32.946 -16.716
Slope Standard Error 0.026 0.035
Residual Standard Error 27.8 36.7
Residual Standard Error (%) 8.7 11.6
Low-Estimate 2.6 3.7
High-Estimate 9.1 12.2


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(S12A.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12A.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -79.274 -19.309  -5.834  23.280  88.578 
## 
## Coefficients:
##              Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept) -16.71640   14.36069  -1.164    0.255    
## DEP           0.94701    0.03474  27.256   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 36.71 on 26 degrees of freedom
##   (30 observations deleted due to missingness)
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9662, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9649 
## F-statistic: 742.9 on 1 and 26 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(S12A.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions
## From: Peña and Slate (2006) Global Validation of Linear Model Assumptions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101:341–354.

gvlma(S12A.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12A.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##     -16.716        0.947  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = S12A.lm) 
## 
##                       Value p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        10.70042 0.03015 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Skewness            0.07045 0.79068    Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis            0.17213 0.67823    Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function       4.23048 0.03970 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Heteroscedasticity  6.22736 0.01258 Assumptions NOT satisfied!

1 Does not fit the assumptions of a linear model


S-12B

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 1.033
Intercept -33.34
Slope Standard Error 0.029
0.97
Residual Standard Error 25.19
F-Statistic 1272.4
DOF 33
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data from USGS Site ID: 02289019 (Link to data)
3 Rating curve for Federal Water Year 2009 - 2017 (Link to data)




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instantaneous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2009 - 2017.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 25.19 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 314.7 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) 37.3 - 747 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) 164.5 - 742 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 8 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.029 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 2.8 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 8.5 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 0.952 1.033
Intercept 0.000 -33.338
Slope Standard Error 0.011 0.029
Residual Standard Error 35.1 25.2
Residual Standard Error (%) 10.2 8
Low-Estimate 1.2 2.8
High-Estimate 10.3 8.5


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(S12B.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12B.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -49.154 -14.048  -2.042  16.063  43.846 
## 
## Coefficients:
##              Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept) -33.33763   10.96329  -3.041   0.0046 ** 
## DEP           1.03321    0.02896  35.671   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 25.19 on 33 degrees of freedom
##   (38 observations deleted due to missingness)
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9747, Adjusted R-squared:  0.974 
## F-statistic:  1272 on 1 and 33 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(S12B.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(S12B.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12B.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##     -33.338        1.033  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = S12B.lm) 
## 
##                      Value p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        5.35750 0.25254    Assumptions acceptable.
## Skewness           0.04188 0.83785    Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis           0.35517 0.55120    Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function      4.43817 0.03514 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Heteroscedasticity 0.52227 0.46987    Assumptions acceptable.

1 Does fit the assumptions of a linear model



S-12C

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 1.085
Intercept -45.85
Slope Standard Error 0.03
0.9
Residual Standard Error 98.25
F-Statistic 1307
DOF 139
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data from USGS Site ID: 02289041 (Link to data)
3 Rating curve for Federal Water Year 2000 - 2017 (Link to data)




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2000 - 2017.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 98.25 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 648.3 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) -5.9 - 1600 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) 74.7 - 1716 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 15.2 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.03 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 2.8 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 15.4 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 1.083 1.085
Intercept -44.39 -45.848
Slope Standard Error 0.029 0.03
Residual Standard Error 98.0 98.3
Residual Standard Error (%) 13.9 15.2
Low-Estimate 2.6 2.8
High-Estimate 14.2 15.4


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(S12C.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12C.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -357.96  -58.39   -8.22   52.20  329.49 
## 
## Coefficients:
##              Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept) -45.84760   22.41453  -2.045   0.0427 *  
## DEP           1.08534    0.03002  36.153   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 98.25 on 139 degrees of freedom
##   (37 observations deleted due to missingness)
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9039, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9032 
## F-statistic:  1307 on 1 and 139 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(S12C.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(S12C.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12C.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##     -45.848        1.085  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = S12C.lm) 
## 
##                      Value   p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        80.4051 1.110e-16 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Skewness            0.8292 3.625e-01    Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis           17.1761 3.407e-05 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Link Function      22.1147 2.568e-06 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Heteroscedasticity 40.2851 2.195e-10 Assumptions NOT satisfied!

1 Does not fit the assumptions of a linear model



S-12D

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.743
Intercept 153.49
Slope Standard Error 0.029
0.8
Residual Standard Error 125.52
F-Statistic 664
DOF 169
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data from USGS Site ID: 254543080405401 (Link to data)
3 Rating curve for Federal Water Year 2001 - 2017 (Link to data)




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2001 - 2017.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 125.52 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 558 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) 7.1 - 1440 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) 156.2 - 1620 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 22.5 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.029 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 3.9 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 22.8 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 0.744 0.743
Intercept 153.303 153.486
Slope Standard Error 0.028 0.029
Residual Standard Error 123.9 125.5
Residual Standard Error (%) 18.8 22.5
Low-Estimate 3.8 3.9
High-Estimate 19.2 22.8


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(S12D.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12D.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -452.40  -84.84  -11.83   72.49  339.95 
## 
## Coefficients:
##              Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept) 153.48601   21.93460   6.997 5.84e-11 ***
## DEP           0.74278    0.02883  25.768  < 2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 125.5 on 169 degrees of freedom
##   (52 observations deleted due to missingness)
## Multiple R-squared:  0.7971, Adjusted R-squared:  0.7959 
## F-statistic:   664 on 1 and 169 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(S12D.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(S12D.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = S12D.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##    153.4860       0.7428  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = S12D.lm) 
## 
##                     Value   p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        19.291 0.0006889 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Skewness            1.567 0.2106547    Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis            3.048 0.0808184    Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function      10.334 0.0013062 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Heteroscedasticity  4.342 0.0371805 Assumptions NOT satisfied!

1 Does not fit the assumptions of a linear model



S-333

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.829
Intercept 0.0
Slope Standard Error 0.014
0.99
Residual Standard Error 73.84
F-Statistic 3529.1
DOF 33
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Linear Model fit with an X-Intercept of 0 (\(\beta_{0}=0\))
3 Data provided by SFWMD




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 1983 - 2014.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 73.84 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 685.7 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) 223 - 1330 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) 323.7 - 1552 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 10.8 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope 0.75 Default
Slope Standard Error 0.014 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 1.9 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 10.9 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias -9.5 \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Existing values in DBHydro are based upon the default calibration
2 All values based on a linear Model fit with an X-Intercept of 0



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 0.829 0.829
Intercept 0.0 0.0
Slope Standard Error 0.014 0.014
Residual Standard Error 73.8 73.8
Residual Standard Error (%) 10.8 10.8
Low-Estimate 1.9 1.9
High-Estimate 10.9 10.9
DBHydro Flow Bias -9.5 -9.5


R-output including linear model output and model diagonistic plots.

summary(S333.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = Q.cfs ~ 0 + X.cfs, data = S333.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##    Min     1Q Median     3Q    Max 
## -97.71 -50.98 -34.79  -2.66 187.78 
## 
## Coefficients:
##       Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## X.cfs  0.82913    0.01396   59.41   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 73.84 on 33 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9907, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9905 
## F-statistic:  3529 on 1 and 33 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(S333.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions
## From: Peña and Slate (2006) Global Validation of Linear Model Assumptions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101:341–354. Code modified for intercept-free linear model application.

gvlma.int0(S333.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = Q.cfs ~ 0 + X.cfs, data = S333.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
##  X.cfs  
## 0.8291  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  NULL 
## 
##                     Value p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        6.3666  0.1734    Assumptions acceptable.
## Skewness           4.6809  0.0305 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Kurtosis           0.1340  0.7143    Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function      0.1612  0.6880    Assumptions acceptable.
## Heteroscedasticity 1.3904  0.2383    Assumptions acceptable.

1 Does fit the assumptions of a linear model



S-334

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.712
Intercept 0.0
Slope Standard Error 0.019
0.99
Residual Standard Error 34.88
F-Statistic 1355
DOF 11
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Linear Model fit with an X-Intercept of 0 (\(\beta_{0}=0\))
3 Data provided by SFWMD




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 1998 - 2014.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 34.88 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 329.8 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) 101.3 - 668 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) 113.5 - 930 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 10.6 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope 0.75 Default
Slope Standard Error 0.019 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 2.6 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 10.9 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias 5.4 \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Existing values in DBHydro are based upon the default calibration
2 All values based on a linear Model fit with an X-Intercept of 0



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 0.712 0.712
Intercept 0.0 0.0
Slope Standard Error 0.019 0.019
Residual Standard Error 34.9 34.9
Residual Standard Error (%) 10.6 10.6
Low-Estimate 2.6 2.6
High-Estimate 10.9 10.9
DBHydro Flow Bias 5.4 5.4


R-output including linear model output and model diagonistic plots.

summary(S334.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = Q.cfs ~ 0 + X.cfs, data = S334.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -77.609  -4.822   3.685  26.102  48.913 
## 
## Coefficients:
##       Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## X.cfs  0.71170    0.01933   36.81 7.17e-13 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 34.88 on 11 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9919, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9912 
## F-statistic:  1355 on 1 and 11 DF,  p-value: 7.169e-13
# plot(S334.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions
## From: Peña and Slate (2006) Global Validation of Linear Model Assumptions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101:341–354. Code modified for intercept-free linear model application.

gvlma.int0(S334.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = Q.cfs ~ 0 + X.cfs, data = S334.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
##  X.cfs  
## 0.7117  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  NULL 
## 
##                      Value p-value                Decision
## Global Stat        4.01453 0.40404 Assumptions acceptable.
## Skewness           0.28753 0.59181 Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis           0.06906 0.79271 Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function      3.20185 0.07355 Assumptions acceptable.
## Heteroscedasticity 0.45609 0.49946 Assumptions acceptable.

1 Does fit the assumptions of a linear model



S-356

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.966
Intercept 0.0
Slope Standard Error 0.003
1
Residual Standard Error 2.41
F-Statistic 85660.9
DOF 3
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Linear Model fit with an X-Intercept of 0 (\(\beta_{0}=0\))
3 Data provided by SFWMD
4 Low Sample Size





Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2005.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 2.41 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 322.5 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) 132.2 - 516 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) 133.5 - 533 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 0.7 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.003 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 0.3 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 0.8 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated, therefore no flow bias was calculated.
2 All values based on a linear Model fit with an X-Intercept of 0



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 0.966 0.966
Intercept 0.0 0.0
Slope Standard Error 0.003 0.003
Residual Standard Error 2.4 2.4
Residual Standard Error (%) 0.7 0.7
Low-Estimate 0.3 0.3
High-Estimate 0.8 0.8
DBHydro Flow Bias NA NA


R-output including linear model output and model diagonistic plots.

summary(S356.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = Q.cfs ~ 0 + X.cfs, data = S356.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##       1       2       4       7 
##  3.2261 -0.4377 -2.3388  1.1669 
## 
## Coefficients:
##       Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## X.cfs 0.966097   0.003301   292.7  8.8e-08 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 2.41 on 3 degrees of freedom
##   (6 observations deleted due to missingness)
## Multiple R-squared:      1,  Adjusted R-squared:      1 
## F-statistic: 8.566e+04 on 1 and 3 DF,  p-value: 8.796e-08
# plot(S356.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions
## From: Peña and Slate (2006) Global Validation of Linear Model Assumptions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101:341–354. Code modified for intercept-free linear model application.

gvlma.int0(S356.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = Q.cfs ~ 0 + X.cfs, data = S356.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
##  X.cfs  
## 0.9661  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  NULL 
## 
##                     Value p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        5.9782 0.20079    Assumptions acceptable.
## Skewness           0.2501 0.61700    Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis           0.2224 0.63721    Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function      4.8766 0.02722 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Heteroscedasticity 0.6290 0.42770    Assumptions acceptable.

1 Does fit the assumptions of a linear model



L-31N Mile-1

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.903
Intercept 18.73
Slope Standard Error 0.037
0.91
Residual Standard Error 97.8
F-Statistic 582.6
DOF 58
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data provide by USGS via DOI for USGS Site ID: 022907647 (Link to site info)
3 Rating curve information provided by USGS via DOI




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2009 - 2016.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 97.8 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 376.6 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) -314.1 - 1253 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) -267 - 1151 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 26 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.037 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 4.1 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 26.3 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope 0.931 0.903
Intercept 0.00 18.733
Slope Standard Error 0.022 0.037
Residual Standard Error 86.9 97.8
Residual Standard Error (%) 22.2 26
Low-Estimate 2.3 4.1
High-Estimate 22.4 26.3


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(L31N_1.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_1.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##      Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
## -222.037  -47.599    5.281   37.886  209.267 
## 
## Coefficients:
##             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept) 18.73287   19.47297   0.962     0.34    
## DEP          0.90339    0.03743  24.137   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 97.8 on 58 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9095, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9079 
## F-statistic: 582.6 on 1 and 58 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(L31N_1.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(L31N_1.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_1.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##     18.7329       0.9034  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = L31N_1.lm) 
## 
##                      Value  p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        13.0057 0.011248 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Skewness            0.2720 0.601960    Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis            0.0862 0.769066    Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function       2.9578 0.085463    Assumptions acceptable.
## Heteroscedasticity  9.6896 0.001853 Assumptions NOT satisfied!

1 Does not fit the assumptions of a linear model



L-31N Mile-3

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.995
Intercept 6.22
Slope Standard Error 0.025
0.97
Residual Standard Error 59.35
F-Statistic 1603.2
DOF 50
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data provide by USGS via DOI for USGS Site ID: 02290765 (Link to site info)
3 Rating curve information provided by USGS via DOI




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2004 - 2017.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 59.35 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 466.2 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) -64 - 1346 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) -66.4 - 1349 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 12.7 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.025 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 2.5 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 13 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope NA 0.995
Intercept NA 6.223
Slope Standard Error NA 0.025
Residual Standard Error NA 59.3
Residual Standard Error (%) NA 12.7
Low-Estimate NA 2.5
High-Estimate NA 13
Note:
Not included in the original analysis by Walker (2019)


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(L31N_3.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_3.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##      Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
## -133.285  -38.421   -3.242   46.653  159.215 
## 
## Coefficients:
##             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)  6.22267   14.13276    0.44    0.662    
## DEP          0.99498    0.02485   40.04   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 59.35 on 50 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9698, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9692 
## F-statistic:  1603 on 1 and 50 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(L31N_3.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(L31N_3.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_3.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##       6.223        0.995  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = L31N_3.lm) 
## 
##                       Value p-value                Decision
## Global Stat        4.242667 0.37416 Assumptions acceptable.
## Skewness           0.148099 0.70036 Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis           0.004131 0.94875 Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function      0.581322 0.44579 Assumptions acceptable.
## Heteroscedasticity 3.509115 0.06103 Assumptions acceptable.

1 Does fit the assumptions of a linear model



L-31N Mile-4

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 1.025
Intercept -18.09
Slope Standard Error 0.035
0.94
Residual Standard Error 76.7
F-Statistic 850.1
DOF 55
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data provide by USGS via DOI for USGS Site ID: 02290766 (Link to site info)
3 Rating curve information provided by USGS via DOI




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2007 - 2016.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 76.7 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 435.7 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) -47.9 - 1246 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) -44.4 - 1219 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 17.6 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.035 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 3.4 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 17.9 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope NA 1.025
Intercept NA -18.091
Slope Standard Error NA 0.035
Residual Standard Error NA 76.7
Residual Standard Error (%) NA 17.6
Low-Estimate NA 3.4
High-Estimate NA 17.9
Note:
Not included in the original analysis by Walker (2019)


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(L31N_4.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_4.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##      Min       1Q   Median       3Q      Max 
## -244.147  -42.429    4.724   56.076  191.979 
## 
## Coefficients:
##              Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept) -18.09110   18.58688  -0.973    0.335    
## DEP           1.02541    0.03517  29.157   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 76.7 on 55 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9392, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9381 
## F-statistic: 850.1 on 1 and 55 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(L31N_4.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(L31N_4.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_4.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##     -18.091        1.025  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = L31N_4.lm) 
## 
##                     Value   p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        20.040 0.0004904 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Skewness            1.281 0.2576398    Assumptions acceptable.
## Kurtosis            1.888 0.1693718    Assumptions acceptable.
## Link Function       7.926 0.0048727 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Heteroscedasticity  8.944 0.0027839 Assumptions NOT satisfied!

1 Does not fit the assumptions of a linear model



L-31N Mile-5

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 1.017
Intercept 3.02
Slope Standard Error 0.039
0.93
Residual Standard Error 91.79
F-Statistic 683
DOF 51
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data provide by USGS via DOI for USGS Site ID: 02290767 (Link to site info)
3 Rating curve information provided by USGS via DOI




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 2007 - 2017.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 91.79 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 455.8 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) -7 - 1323 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) -36.5 - 1287 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 20.1 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.039 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 3.8 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 20.5 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope NA 1.017
Intercept NA 3.021
Slope Standard Error NA 0.039
Residual Standard Error NA 91.8
Residual Standard Error (%) NA 20.1
Low-Estimate NA 3.8
High-Estimate NA 20.5
Note:
Not included in the original analysis by Walker (2019)


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(L31N_5.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_5.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -129.12  -39.33  -13.28   19.53  503.90 
## 
## Coefficients:
##             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept)  3.02057   21.42833   0.141    0.888    
## DEP          1.01703    0.03892  26.134   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 91.79 on 51 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9305, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9292 
## F-statistic:   683 on 1 and 51 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(L31N_5.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(L31N_5.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_5.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##       3.021        1.017  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = L31N_5.lm) 
## 
##                        Value   p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        768.76734 0.000e+00 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Skewness           114.06199 0.000e+00 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Kurtosis           632.28978 0.000e+00 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Link Function        0.04036 8.408e-01    Assumptions acceptable.
## Heteroscedasticity  22.37521 2.243e-06 Assumptions NOT satisfied!

1 Does not fit the assumptions of a linear model



L-31N Mile-7

Regression Measured vs. Rated

Linear Model output results.
Term Value
Slope 0.921
Intercept 17.51
Slope Standard Error 0.02
0.95
Residual Standard Error 68.47
F-Statistic 2069.1
DOF 106
ρ-value <0.01
Note:
Model results from ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regression performed in R
1 Values presented here are rounded for convience
2 Data provide by USGS via DOI for USGS Site ID: 02290768 (Link to site info)
3 Rating curve information provided by USGS via DOI




Summary of uncertainty of estimates from measured and rated instanteous flow estimates for Federal Water Year 1900 - 2017.
Term Value Source
Residual Standard Error 68.47 Linear Regression output (see above)
Measured Mean 498.2 Mean of measured data
Measured Range (min - max) 9.9 - 1419 Range of measured data
Rated Range (min - max) -88 - 1601 Range of estimated data from rating curve
Residual Standard Error (%) 13.7 \(\frac{Residual\;Standard\;Error}{Measured\;Mean} \times 100\)
Default Calibration Slope NA Default
Slope Standard Error 0.02 Linear Regression output (see above)
Slope Standard Error (%) (Low Estimate) 2.2 \(\frac{Slope\; Standard\; Error}{Default\; Calibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
Total Error (%) (High Estimate) 13.9 \(\sqrt{Residual\; Standard\; Error^{2} + Slope\; Standard\; Error^{2}}\)
Flow Bias NA \(\frac{DBHydro\; Calibration\; Slope\: -\: Recalibration\; Slope}{Recalibration\; Slope} \times 100\)
1 Flows in DBHydro assumed to be calibrated.



Comparison of Walker (2018) analysis and this confirmatory analysis using identical data and methods.
Parameter Walker (2018) This Analysis
Slope NA 0.921
Intercept NA 17.514
Slope Standard Error NA 0.02
Residual Standard Error NA 68.5
Residual Standard Error (%) NA 13.7
Low-Estimate NA 2.2
High-Estimate NA 13.9
Note:
Not included in the original analysis by Walker (2019)


R-output including linear model output, model diagonistic plots and Global Validation of Linear Model assumption results.

summary(L31N_7.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_7.dat)
## 
## Residuals:
##     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max 
## -155.75  -38.45   -0.23   29.19  426.67 
## 
## Coefficients:
##             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
## (Intercept) 17.51415   12.45380   1.406    0.163    
## DEP          0.92071    0.02024  45.487   <2e-16 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## Residual standard error: 68.47 on 106 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared:  0.9513, Adjusted R-squared:  0.9508 
## F-statistic:  2069 on 1 and 106 DF,  p-value: < 2.2e-16
# plot(L31N_7.lm) # Default linear model diagnostic plots

# Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions

gvlma(L31N_7.lm)
## 
## Call:
## lm(formula = discharge_va ~ DEP, data = L31N_7.dat)
## 
## Coefficients:
## (Intercept)          DEP  
##     17.5142       0.9207  
## 
## 
## ASSESSMENT OF THE LINEAR MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
## USING THE GLOBAL TEST ON 4 DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM:
## Level of Significance =  0.05 
## 
## Call:
##  gvlma(x = L31N_7.lm) 
## 
##                       Value p-value                   Decision
## Global Stat        853.4621 0.00000 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Skewness            98.9271 0.00000 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Kurtosis           750.8519 0.00000 Assumptions NOT satisfied!
## Link Function        0.3144 0.57500    Assumptions acceptable.
## Heteroscedasticity   3.3686 0.06645    Assumptions acceptable.

1 Does not fit the assumptions of a linear model



Summary of Results

Summary of Results
Parameter S12A S12B S12C S12D S333 S334 S356 L31N_M1 L31N_M3 L31N_M4 L31N_M5 L31N_M7
Slope 0.947 1.033 1.085 0.743 0.829 0.712 0.966 0.903 0.995 1.025 1.017 0.921
Intercept -16.716 -33.338 -45.848 153.486 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.733 6.223 -18.091 3.021 17.514
Slope Standard Error 0.035 0.029 0.03 0.029 0.014 0.019 0.003 0.037 0.025 0.035 0.039 0.02
Residual Standard Error 36.7 25.2 98.3 125.5 73.8 34.9 2.4 97.8 59.3 76.7 91.8 68.5
Residual Standard Error (%) 11.6 8 15.2 22.5 10.8 10.6 0.7 26 12.7 17.6 20.1 13.7
Low-Estimate 3.7 2.8 2.8 3.9 1.9 2.6 0.3 4.1 2.5 3.4 3.8 2.2
High-Estimate 12.2 8.5 15.4 22.8 10.9 10.9 0.8 26.3 13 17.9 20.5 13.9
Model Assumptions Not Acceptable Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Not Acceptable Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Acceptable
Note:
L-31N Mile 3,4,5, and 7 were not included in the original analysis by Walker (2019)



A code chunk example of the analysis performed, this is specfic to the USGS data for the S12A structure.

USGS.site="254543080491101"
S12A.rating=readNWISrating(USGS.site,type="exsa");#DEP=Discharge - CFS; INDEP=Stage - FT
S12A.rating$INDEP=with(S12A.rating,INDEP+SHIFT)

rate.date.begin=date.fun(paste(substr(attributes(S12A.rating)$comment[32],27,30),substr(attributes(S12A.rating)$comment[32],31,32),substr(attributes(S12A.rating)$comment[32],33,34),sep="-"));
rate.date.begin
WY(rate.date.begin+ddays(1),"Fed")

S12A.inst.Q=readNWISmeas(USGS.site,startDate=sdate.usgs,endDate=edate.usgs)
S12A.inst.Q$measurement_dt=date.fun(S12A.inst.Q$measurement_dt)
S12A.inst.Q$WY=WY(S12A.inst.Q$measurement_dt,"Fed")
S12A.inst.Q=merge(S12A.inst.Q,S12A.rating[,c("INDEP","DEP")],by.x="gage_height_va",by.y="INDEP",all.x=T)
S12A.dat=subset(S12A.inst.Q,WY%in%seq(WY(rate.date.begin+ddays(1),"Fed"),2017,1))

plot(discharge_va~DEP,S12A.dat)
S12A.lm=lm(discharge_va~DEP,S12A.dat)
mod.val=gvlma(S12A.lm)

Metadata - Session Info