The objectives of this problem set is to orient you to a number of activities in R. And to conduct a thoughtful exercise in appreciating the importance of data visualization. For each question create a code chunk or text response that completes/answers the activity or question requested. Finally, upon completion name your final output .html file as: YourName_ANLY512-Section-Year-Semester.html and upload it to the “Problem Set 2” assignmenet on Moodle.
anscombe data that is part of the library(datasets) in R. And assign that data to a new object called data.data <- anscombe
fBasics() package!)library("fBasics")
## Loading required package: timeDate
## Loading required package: timeSeries
mean(data$x1)
## [1] 9
mean(data$x2)
## [1] 9
mean(data$x3)
## [1] 9
mean(data$x4)
## [1] 9
mean(data$y1)
## [1] 7.500909
mean(data$y2)
## [1] 7.500909
mean(data$y3)
## [1] 7.5
mean(data$y4)
## [1] 7.500909
var(data$x1)
## [1] 11
var(data$x2)
## [1] 11
var(data$x3)
## [1] 11
var(data$x4)
## [1] 11
var(data$y1)
## [1] 4.127269
var(data$y2)
## [1] 4.127629
var(data$y3)
## [1] 4.12262
var(data$y4)
## [1] 4.123249
correlationTest(data$x1,data$y1)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8164
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.2415
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.00217
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001085
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4244, 0.9507
## Less: -1, 0.9388
## Greater: 0.5113, 1
##
## Description:
## Sat Aug 18 13:36:38 2018
correlationTest(data$x2,data$y2)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8162
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.2386
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.002179
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001089
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4239, 0.9506
## Less: -1, 0.9387
## Greater: 0.5109, 1
##
## Description:
## Sat Aug 18 13:36:38 2018
correlationTest(data$x3,data$y3)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8163
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.2394
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.002176
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001088
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4241, 0.9507
## Less: -1, 0.9387
## Greater: 0.511, 1
##
## Description:
## Sat Aug 18 13:36:38 2018
correlationTest(data$x4,data$y4)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8165
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.243
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.002165
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001082
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4246, 0.9507
## Less: -1, 0.9388
## Greater: 0.5115, 1
##
## Description:
## Sat Aug 18 13:36:38 2018
plot(data$x1,data$y1, main="scatter plots btw x1 and y1")
plot(data$x2,data$y2, main="scatter plots btw x2 and y2")
plot(data$x3,data$y3, main="scatter plots btw x3 and y3")
plot(data$x4,data$y4, main="scatter plots btw x4 and y4")
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
plot(data$x1,data$y1, main="Scatterplot between x1,y1",pch=20)
plot(data$x2,data$y2, main="Scatterplot between x2,y2",pch=20)
plot(data$x3,data$y3, main="Scatterplot between x3,y3",pch=20)
plot(data$x4,data$y4, main="Scatterplot between x4,y4",pch=20)
lm() function.fit1<-lm(data$y1~data$x1)
fit2<-lm(data$y2~data$x2)
fit3<-lm(data$y3~data$x3)
fit4<-lm(data$y4~data$x4)
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
plot(data$x1,data$y1, main="Scatterplot between x1,y1",pch=20)
abline(fit1, col="blue") # regression line (y~x)
plot(data$x2,data$y2, main="Scatterplot between x2,y2",pch=20)
abline(fit2, col="red") # regression line (y~x)
plot(data$x3,data$y3, main="Scatterplot between x3,y3",pch=20)
abline(fit3, col="green") # regression line (y~x)
plot(data$x4,data$y4, main="Scatterplot between x4,y4",pch=20)
abline(fit4, col="purple") # regression line (y~x)
anova(fit1)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y1 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x1 1 27.510 27.5100 17.99 0.00217 ** Residuals 9 13.763 1.5292
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(fit2)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y2 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x2 1 27.500 27.5000 17.966 0.002179 ** Residuals 9 13.776 1.5307
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(fit3)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y3 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x3 1 27.470 27.4700 17.972 0.002176 ** Residuals 9 13.756 1.5285
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(fit4)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y4 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x4 1 27.490 27.4900 18.003 0.002165 ** Residuals 9 13.742 1.5269
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
Anscombe’s Quartet is consisted of 4 datasets, which have similar descriptive statics features, but thye present different shapes based on above data visulization (plots). Therefore, I can confidently claim that data visualization is able to tell the truth of data and present differences in dataset in such way that reader are comfortable with.