Slides are available at http://rpubs.com/jbaglin/
Before we begin to dig deeper, we need review levels of measurement:
Levels of measurement continued:
## Ozone Solar.R Wind Temp Month Day date
## 1 41 190 7.4 67 5 1 1973-05-01
## 2 36 118 8.0 72 5 2 1973-05-02
## 3 12 149 12.6 74 5 3 1973-05-03
## 4 18 313 11.5 62 5 4 1973-05-04
## 5 NA NA 14.3 56 5 5 1973-05-05
## 6 28 NA 14.9 66 5 6 1973-05-06
## 7 23 299 8.6 65 5 7 1973-05-07
## 8 19 99 13.8 59 5 8 1973-05-08
## 9 8 19 20.1 61 5 9 1973-05-09
## 10 NA 194 8.6 69 5 10 1973-05-10
## 11 7 NA 6.9 74 5 11 1973-05-11
## 12 16 256 9.7 69 5 12 1973-05-12
## 13 11 290 9.2 66 5 13 1973-05-13
## 14 14 274 10.9 68 5 14 1973-05-14
## 15 18 65 13.2 58 5 15 1973-05-15
## 16 14 334 11.5 64 5 16 1973-05-16
## 17 34 307 12.0 66 5 17 1973-05-17
## 18 6 78 18.4 57 5 18 1973-05-18
## 19 30 322 11.5 68 5 19 1973-05-19
## 20 11 44 9.7 62 5 20 1973-05-20
## 21 1 8 9.7 59 5 21 1973-05-21
## 22 11 320 16.6 73 5 22 1973-05-22
## 23 4 25 9.7 61 5 23 1973-05-23
## 24 32 92 12.0 61 5 24 1973-05-24
## 25 NA 66 16.6 57 5 25 1973-05-25
## 26 NA 266 14.9 58 5 26 1973-05-26
## 27 NA NA 8.0 57 5 27 1973-05-27
## 28 23 13 12.0 67 5 28 1973-05-28
## 29 45 252 14.9 81 5 29 1973-05-29
## 30 115 223 5.7 79 5 30 1973-05-30
## 31 37 279 7.4 76 5 31 1973-05-31
## 32 NA 286 8.6 78 6 1 1973-06-01
## 33 NA 287 9.7 74 6 2 1973-06-02
## 34 NA 242 16.1 67 6 3 1973-06-03
## 35 NA 186 9.2 84 6 4 1973-06-04
## 36 NA 220 8.6 85 6 5 1973-06-05
## 37 NA 264 14.3 79 6 6 1973-06-06
## 38 29 127 9.7 82 6 7 1973-06-07
## 39 NA 273 6.9 87 6 8 1973-06-08
## 40 71 291 13.8 90 6 9 1973-06-09
## 41 39 323 11.5 87 6 10 1973-06-10
## 42 NA 259 10.9 93 6 11 1973-06-11
## 43 NA 250 9.2 92 6 12 1973-06-12
## 44 23 148 8.0 82 6 13 1973-06-13
## 45 NA 332 13.8 80 6 14 1973-06-14
## 46 NA 322 11.5 79 6 15 1973-06-15
## 47 21 191 14.9 77 6 16 1973-06-16
## 48 37 284 20.7 72 6 17 1973-06-17
## 49 20 37 9.2 65 6 18 1973-06-18
## 50 12 120 11.5 73 6 19 1973-06-19
## 51 13 137 10.3 76 6 20 1973-06-20
## 52 NA 150 6.3 77 6 21 1973-06-21
## 53 NA 59 1.7 76 6 22 1973-06-22
## 54 NA 91 4.6 76 6 23 1973-06-23
## 55 NA 250 6.3 76 6 24 1973-06-24
## 56 NA 135 8.0 75 6 25 1973-06-25
## 57 NA 127 8.0 78 6 26 1973-06-26
## 58 NA 47 10.3 73 6 27 1973-06-27
## 59 NA 98 11.5 80 6 28 1973-06-28
## 60 NA 31 14.9 77 6 29 1973-06-29
## 61 NA 138 8.0 83 6 30 1973-06-30
## 62 135 269 4.1 84 7 1 1973-07-01
## 63 49 248 9.2 85 7 2 1973-07-02
## 64 32 236 9.2 81 7 3 1973-07-03
## 65 NA 101 10.9 84 7 4 1973-07-04
## 66 64 175 4.6 83 7 5 1973-07-05
## 67 40 314 10.9 83 7 6 1973-07-06
## 68 77 276 5.1 88 7 7 1973-07-07
## 69 97 267 6.3 92 7 8 1973-07-08
## 70 97 272 5.7 92 7 9 1973-07-09
## 71 85 175 7.4 89 7 10 1973-07-10
## 72 NA 139 8.6 82 7 11 1973-07-11
## 73 10 264 14.3 73 7 12 1973-07-12
## 74 27 175 14.9 81 7 13 1973-07-13
## 75 NA 291 14.9 91 7 14 1973-07-14
## 76 7 48 14.3 80 7 15 1973-07-15
## 77 48 260 6.9 81 7 16 1973-07-16
## 78 35 274 10.3 82 7 17 1973-07-17
## 79 61 285 6.3 84 7 18 1973-07-18
## 80 79 187 5.1 87 7 19 1973-07-19
## 81 63 220 11.5 85 7 20 1973-07-20
## 82 16 7 6.9 74 7 21 1973-07-21
## 83 NA 258 9.7 81 7 22 1973-07-22
## 84 NA 295 11.5 82 7 23 1973-07-23
## 85 80 294 8.6 86 7 24 1973-07-24
## 86 108 223 8.0 85 7 25 1973-07-25
## 87 20 81 8.6 82 7 26 1973-07-26
## 88 52 82 12.0 86 7 27 1973-07-27
## 89 82 213 7.4 88 7 28 1973-07-28
## 90 50 275 7.4 86 7 29 1973-07-29
## 91 64 253 7.4 83 7 30 1973-07-30
## 92 59 254 9.2 81 7 31 1973-07-31
## 93 39 83 6.9 81 8 1 1973-08-01
## 94 9 24 13.8 81 8 2 1973-08-02
## 95 16 77 7.4 82 8 3 1973-08-03
## 96 78 NA 6.9 86 8 4 1973-08-04
## 97 35 NA 7.4 85 8 5 1973-08-05
## 98 66 NA 4.6 87 8 6 1973-08-06
## 99 122 255 4.0 89 8 7 1973-08-07
## 100 89 229 10.3 90 8 8 1973-08-08
## 101 110 207 8.0 90 8 9 1973-08-09
## 102 NA 222 8.6 92 8 10 1973-08-10
## 103 NA 137 11.5 86 8 11 1973-08-11
## 104 44 192 11.5 86 8 12 1973-08-12
## 105 28 273 11.5 82 8 13 1973-08-13
## 106 65 157 9.7 80 8 14 1973-08-14
## 107 NA 64 11.5 79 8 15 1973-08-15
## 108 22 71 10.3 77 8 16 1973-08-16
## 109 59 51 6.3 79 8 17 1973-08-17
## 110 23 115 7.4 76 8 18 1973-08-18
## 111 31 244 10.9 78 8 19 1973-08-19
## 112 44 190 10.3 78 8 20 1973-08-20
## 113 21 259 15.5 77 8 21 1973-08-21
## 114 9 36 14.3 72 8 22 1973-08-22
## 115 NA 255 12.6 75 8 23 1973-08-23
## 116 45 212 9.7 79 8 24 1973-08-24
## 117 168 238 3.4 81 8 25 1973-08-25
## 118 73 215 8.0 86 8 26 1973-08-26
## 119 NA 153 5.7 88 8 27 1973-08-27
## 120 76 203 9.7 97 8 28 1973-08-28
## 121 118 225 2.3 94 8 29 1973-08-29
## 122 84 237 6.3 96 8 30 1973-08-30
## 123 85 188 6.3 94 8 31 1973-08-31
## 124 96 167 6.9 91 9 1 1973-09-01
## 125 78 197 5.1 92 9 2 1973-09-02
## 126 73 183 2.8 93 9 3 1973-09-03
## 127 91 189 4.6 93 9 4 1973-09-04
## 128 47 95 7.4 87 9 5 1973-09-05
## 129 32 92 15.5 84 9 6 1973-09-06
## 130 20 252 10.9 80 9 7 1973-09-07
## 131 23 220 10.3 78 9 8 1973-09-08
## 132 21 230 10.9 75 9 9 1973-09-09
## 133 24 259 9.7 73 9 10 1973-09-10
## 134 44 236 14.9 81 9 11 1973-09-11
## 135 21 259 15.5 76 9 12 1973-09-12
## 136 28 238 6.3 77 9 13 1973-09-13
## 137 9 24 10.9 71 9 14 1973-09-14
## 138 13 112 11.5 71 9 15 1973-09-15
## 139 46 237 6.9 78 9 16 1973-09-16
## 140 18 224 13.8 67 9 17 1973-09-17
## 141 13 27 10.3 76 9 18 1973-09-18
## 142 24 238 10.3 68 9 19 1973-09-19
## 143 16 201 8.0 82 9 20 1973-09-20
## 144 13 238 12.6 64 9 21 1973-09-21
## 145 23 14 9.2 71 9 22 1973-09-22
## 146 36 139 10.3 81 9 23 1973-09-23
## 147 7 49 10.3 69 9 24 1973-09-24
## 148 14 20 16.6 63 9 25 1973-09-25
## 149 30 193 6.9 70 9 26 1973-09-26
## 150 NA 145 13.2 77 9 27 1973-09-27
## 151 14 191 14.3 75 9 28 1973-09-28
## 152 18 131 8.0 76 9 29 1973-09-29
## 153 20 223 11.5 68 9 30 1973-09-30
stats transformations include the following:
Common systems include the following:
Kirk’s (2012) visual design process…
Kaiser Fung, author of Junk Charts, provides a very simple and powerful framework, called the Trifecta Check-up, to use when evaluating a data visualisation.
According to Kaiser’s Trifecta check-up, there are eight possible critiques for a data visualisation.
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Q | Poor question |
| D | Poor data |
| V | Poor visuals |
| QD | Poor question and problematic data, but visuals are OK. |
| QV | Data are good, but question and visuals are out of sync |
| DV | Good question, but issues with data and visuals |
| QDV | The data visualisation fails everything |
| Trifecta | Q, D and V are in sync. Good data visualisation |
Always check for common issues including the following:
Bakker, A., P. Kent, J. Derry, R. Noss, and C. Hoyles. 2008. “Statistical inference at work: Statistical process control as an example.” Statistical Education Research Journal 7 (2): 130–45. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj.
Buja, A., D. Cook, H. Hofmann, M. Lawrence, E.-K. Lee, D. F. Swayne, and H. Wickham. 2009. “Statistical inference for exploratory data analysis and model diagnostics.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 367 (1906): 4361–83. doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0120.
Kirk, A. 2012. Data visualization: a successful design process. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd.
Paparistodemou, E., and M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris. 2008. “Developing young students’ informal inference skills in data analysis.” Statistics Education Research Journal 7 (2): 83–106. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj.
Tal, A., and B. Wansink. 2016. “Blinded with science: Trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (1): 117–25. doi:10.1177/0963662514549688.
Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wickham, H. 2010. “A layered grammar of graphics.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 19 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1198/jcgs.2009.07098.
Wilkinson, L. 2005. The Grammar of Graphics. Statistics and Computing. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/0-387-28695-0.