First published: 18 May, 2017
Updated: 20 June, 2018

Introduction

Recently we decided to report raw neonatal ABR results and determine only if they are within the normal range. However this prevents us determining if a hearing loss is conductive or sensorineural.

Solution

Using historical data from neonates we diagnosed with either no hearing loss or a sensorineural hearing loss, we recorded air and bone conduction thresholds for further analysis.

Deming regression

There is an apparent linear relationship between air and the associated bone conduction thresholds. For both AC and BC thresholds there will be:

Deming regression (which assumes error in both x and y measurements) was used to describe the air and bone conduction relationship.

Table 1: Deming regression coefficients
Frequency, Hz Intercept SE in Int. Slope SE in Slope Upper lim. Slope
500 -14.694 0.371 0.759 0.008 0.845
1,000 -41.273 2.420 2.879 0.137 4.497
2,000 14.163 0.251 0.642 0.008 0.719
4,000 9.767 0.281 0.691 0.013 0.969

For 500 Hz, 2 kHz and 4 kHz, the regression fits the data quite nicely:

The lower bound at the dotted line is 15dB below the regression line.

Table 2: Estimated bone conduction threshold for a Sensorineural hearing loss
Uncorrected AC threshold 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
500 Hz 0 5 10 10 15 20 25 25 30 35 40
2,000 Hz 25 30 35 35 40 45 45 50 55 55
4,000 Hz 25 25 30 35 35 40 45 50

For any sensorineural hearing loss the BC threshold should be not significantly better than the level indicated on Table 2, although in some few cases sensorineural BC thresholds could be up to 15 dB better than the level indicated.