Note that the texture values for clay, silt and sand are the percent of the soil mass less than 1mm.
The proportion of soil between 5-2mm and 2-1mm is a percentage of the soil mass less than 5mm.
Category | Size_um | avg | max | min | sd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clay | 0.02 - 3.99 | 2.629718 | 9.998822 | 0.0000000 | 2.227363 |
Silt | 3.99 - 63.25 | 20.442973 | 66.647455 | 2.8944420 | 12.738825 |
Total sand | 63.25 - 126.19 | 66.524108 | 94.064129 | 10.7946970 | 17.522712 |
Very fine sand | 126.19 - 152.79 | 10.403202 | 19.644248 | 3.0414290 | 3.828432 |
Medium sand | 152.79 - 502.38 | 13.389233 | 33.281450 | 0.6632710 | 5.142493 |
Coarse sand | 502.38 - 1002.37 | 26.852856 | 45.037645 | 0.8212990 | 10.078490 |
Very coarse sand | 1002.37 - 2000 | 16.111232 | 61.250830 | 0.0000000 | 11.190065 |
Between 1-2mm | 8.603699 | 22.319767 | 0.4959088 | 3.332215 | |
Between 2-5mm | 11.241832 | 42.575782 | 1.4877263 | 5.683067 |
The texture data doesn’t look very normal, which could be problematic for kriging.
Let’s look at the distribution of the texture variables across the plots
Variable | avg | sd | min | max |
---|---|---|---|---|
Conductivity (mS) | 3.373133 | 2.172126 | 0.08 | 10.63 |
pH H2O | 6.075733 | 1.671046 | 3.32 | 9.93 |
pH KCl | 5.502733 | 1.642818 | 3.10 | 8.70 |
The relationship between ph(H2O) and ph(KCl) deteriorates at high values. This is probably because the pH meter was much less stable at high pH than low pH.
Conductivity doesn’t seem to have a clear pattern with pH, except that low pH tends to have low conductivity.
Spatially, conductivity doesn’t have very strong trends. But pH correlates well with colour: http://rpubs.com/Chopin/384267