The objectives of this problem set is to orient you to a number of activities in R. And to conduct a thoughtful exercise in appreciating the importance of data visualization. For each question create a code chunk or text response that completes/answers the activity or question requested. Finally, upon completion name your final output .html file as: YourName_ANLY512-Section-Year-Semester.html and upload it to the “Problem Set 2” assignmenet on Moodle.
anscombe data that is part of the library(datasets) in R. And assign that data to a new object called data.data = anscombe
data
## x1 x2 x3 x4 y1 y2 y3 y4
## 1 10 10 10 8 8.04 9.14 7.46 6.58
## 2 8 8 8 8 6.95 8.14 6.77 5.76
## 3 13 13 13 8 7.58 8.74 12.74 7.71
## 4 9 9 9 8 8.81 8.77 7.11 8.84
## 5 11 11 11 8 8.33 9.26 7.81 8.47
## 6 14 14 14 8 9.96 8.10 8.84 7.04
## 7 6 6 6 8 7.24 6.13 6.08 5.25
## 8 4 4 4 19 4.26 3.10 5.39 12.50
## 9 12 12 12 8 10.84 9.13 8.15 5.56
## 10 7 7 7 8 4.82 7.26 6.42 7.91
## 11 5 5 5 8 5.68 4.74 5.73 6.89
fBasics() package!)mean(data$x1)
## [1] 9
var(data$x1)
## [1] 11
mean(data$x2)
## [1] 9
var(data$x2)
## [1] 11
mean(data$x3)
## [1] 9
var(data$x3)
## [1] 11
mean(data$x4)
## [1] 9
var(data$x4)
## [1] 11
mean(data$y1)
## [1] 7.500909
var(data$y1)
## [1] 4.127269
mean(data$y2)
## [1] 7.500909
var(data$y2)
## [1] 4.127629
mean(data$y3)
## [1] 7.5
var(data$y3)
## [1] 4.12262
mean(data$y4)
## [1] 7.500909
var(data$y4)
## [1] 4.123249
library("fBasics")
## Warning: package 'fBasics' was built under R version 3.4.3
## Loading required package: timeDate
## Warning: package 'timeDate' was built under R version 3.4.2
## Loading required package: timeSeries
## Warning: package 'timeSeries' was built under R version 3.4.3
correlationTest(data$x1, data$y1)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8164
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.2415
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.00217
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001085
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4244, 0.9507
## Less: -1, 0.9388
## Greater: 0.5113, 1
##
## Description:
## Fri Dec 08 20:31:28 2017
correlationTest(data$x2, data$y2)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8162
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.2386
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.002179
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001089
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4239, 0.9506
## Less: -1, 0.9387
## Greater: 0.5109, 1
##
## Description:
## Fri Dec 08 20:31:28 2017
correlationTest(data$x3, data$y3)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8163
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.2394
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.002176
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001088
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4241, 0.9507
## Less: -1, 0.9387
## Greater: 0.511, 1
##
## Description:
## Fri Dec 08 20:31:28 2017
correlationTest(data$x4, data$y4)
##
## Title:
## Pearson's Correlation Test
##
## Test Results:
## PARAMETER:
## Degrees of Freedom: 9
## SAMPLE ESTIMATES:
## Correlation: 0.8165
## STATISTIC:
## t: 4.243
## P VALUE:
## Alternative Two-Sided: 0.002165
## Alternative Less: 0.9989
## Alternative Greater: 0.001082
## CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
## Two-Sided: 0.4246, 0.9507
## Less: -1, 0.9388
## Greater: 0.5115, 1
##
## Description:
## Fri Dec 08 20:31:28 2017
plot(data$x1, data$y1, main = "Scater Plot - x1,y1")
plot(data$x2, data$y2, main = "Scater Plot - x2,y2")
plot(data$x3, data$y3, main = "Scater Plot - x3,y3")
plot(data$x4, data$y4, main = "Scater Plot - x4,y4")
par(mfrow= c(2,2))
plot(data$x1, data$y1, main = "Scater Plot - x1,y1", pch = 20)
plot(data$x2, data$y2, main = "Scater Plot - x2,y2", pch = 20)
plot(data$x3, data$y3, main = "Scater Plot - x3,y3", pch = 20)
plot(data$x4, data$y4, main = "Scater Plot - x4,y4", pch = 20)
lm() function.fit1 <- lm(data$y1 ~ data$x1)
summary(fit1)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = data$y1 ~ data$x1)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.92127 -0.45577 -0.04136 0.70941 1.83882
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 3.0001 1.1247 2.667 0.02573 *
## data$x1 0.5001 0.1179 4.241 0.00217 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 1.237 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6665, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6295
## F-statistic: 17.99 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.00217
fit2 <- lm(data$y2 ~ data$x2)
summary(fit2)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = data$y2 ~ data$x2)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.9009 -0.7609 0.1291 0.9491 1.2691
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 3.001 1.125 2.667 0.02576 *
## data$x2 0.500 0.118 4.239 0.00218 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 1.237 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6662, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6292
## F-statistic: 17.97 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.002179
fit3 <- lm(data$y3 ~ data$x3)
summary(fit3)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = data$y3 ~ data$x3)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.1586 -0.6146 -0.2303 0.1540 3.2411
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 3.0025 1.1245 2.670 0.02562 *
## data$x3 0.4997 0.1179 4.239 0.00218 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 1.236 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6663, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6292
## F-statistic: 17.97 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.002176
fit4 <- lm(data$y4 ~ data$x4)
summary(fit4)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = data$y4 ~ data$x4)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.751 -0.831 0.000 0.809 1.839
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 3.0017 1.1239 2.671 0.02559 *
## data$x4 0.4999 0.1178 4.243 0.00216 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 1.236 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6667, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6297
## F-statistic: 18 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.002165
par(mfrow= c(2,2))
plot(data$x1, data$y1, main = "Scater Plot - x1,y1", pch = 20)
abline(fit1, col = "blue")
plot(data$x2, data$y2, main = "Scater Plot - x2,y2", pch = 20)
abline(fit2, col = "blue")
plot(data$x3, data$y3, main = "Scater Plot - x3,y3", pch = 20)
abline(fit3, col = "blue")
plot(data$x4, data$y4, main = "Scater Plot - x4,y4", pch = 20)
abline(fit4, col = "blue")
anova(fit1)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y1 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x1 1 27.510 27.5100 17.99 0.00217 ** Residuals 9 13.763 1.5292
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(fit2)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y2 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x2 1 27.500 27.5000 17.966 0.002179 ** Residuals 9 13.776 1.5307
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(fit3)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y3 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x3 1 27.470 27.4700 17.972 0.002176 ** Residuals 9 13.756 1.5285
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(fit4)
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: data\(y4 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) data\)x4 1 27.490 27.4900 18.003 0.002165 ** Residuals 9 13.742 1.5269
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
Anscombe’s quartet is example of why summary statistics are not sufficient to analyze data and tell the whole story about the data. Anscombe’s Quartet consists of four data set of similar kind of data. Each data set consists of eleven pairs of values for x and y. The summary statistics are almost similar with each column values and correlations.
The four data set appear to be identical. But, when we plot the four data sets on x, y plane we find the data sets are not similar. Each data set tells a different story. Dataset1 consists of a set of follows a rough linear relationship. Dataset2 does not show linear relationship, rather y has a smooth curve relation with x and with little residual variability. Dataset III looks like a tight linear relationship between x and y, except for one large outlier. Dataset IV looks like x remains constant, except for one outlier as well.