Graded: 6.6, 6.12, 6.20, 6.28, 6.44, 6.48
6.6 2010 Healthcare Law. On June 28, 2012 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the much debated 2010 healthcare law, declaring it constitutional. A Gallup poll released the day after this decision indicates that 46% of 1,012 Americans agree with this decision. At a 95% confidence level, this sample has a 3% margin of error. Based on this information, determine if the following statements are true or false, and explain your reasoning.39
Ans: False. A ci is contructed to est. the population proportion, not the sample proportion.
margin of error for a 95% confidence interval: ME = 1.96 × SE = 1.96 × sqrt(p(1-p)/n)
Ans:True. The 95% ci is (0.43, 0.49).
Ans: True. It’s the definition of ci.
Ans: True.Because of the decresing ME(=z*SE).
6.12 Legalization of marijuana, Part I. The 2010 General Social Survey asked 1,259 US residents: “Do you think the use of marijuana should be made legal, or not?” 48% of the respondents said it should be made legal.44
Ans: a sample statistic, because 48% of respondents in 1259 us residents.
Ans: The ci is between 0.4524 and 0.5076.
Ans: True.When the sample is unbias its result can be a good approximation to the population.
Ans:No, less than 50% the interval lies majority.
6.20 Legalize Marijuana, Part II. As discussed in Exercise 6.12, the 2010 General Social Survey reported a sample where about 48% of US residents thought marijuana should be made legal. If we wanted to limit the margin of error of a 95% confidence interval to 2%, about how many Americans would we need to survey ?
2% = 1.96 * sqrt(0.48(1-0.48)/n)
Ans: 2400.
6.28 Sleep deprivation, CA vs. OR, Part I. According to a report on sleep deprivation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the proportion of California residents who reported insucient rest or sleep during each of the preceding 30 days is 8.0%, while this proportion is 8.8% for Oregon residents. These data are based on simple random samples of 11,545 California and 4,691 Oregon residents. Calculate a 95% confidence interval for the di???erence between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived and interpret it in context of the data.
p.ca<-0.08
p.or<-0.088
n.ca<-11545
n.or<-4691
SEsq.ca<-p.ca*(1-p.ca)/n.ca
SEsq.or<-p.or*(1-p.or)/n.or
SE<-sqrt(SEsq.ca+SEsq.or)
diff<-abs(p.ca-p.or)
c(diff-SE*1.96, diff+SE*1.96)
## [1] -0.001498128 0.017498128
6.44 Barking deer. Microhabitat factors associated with forage and bed sites of barking deer in Hainan Island, China were examined from 2001 to 2002. In this region woods make up 4.8% of the land, cultivated grass plot makes up 14.7%, and deciduous forests makes up 39.6%. Of the 426 sites where the deer forage, 4 were categorized as woods, 16 as cultivated grassplot, and 61 as deciduous forests. The table below summarizes these data.62 Woods Cultivated grassplot Deciduous forests Other Total 4 16 61 345 426
Ans: H0: Each habitats and others are equally prefer for barking deer. Ha: Each habitats and others are Not equally prefer for barking deer.
Ans: chi-square goodness of fit test
Ans:Two sample sets are independent.Sample size is large enought to ignor the testing for the sknewness. Each habitats has like and unlike, and p and n are given in this question.
Ans: For chi-square equal to 284.0609 and df=3, p-value is lesser than 0.001. We reject H0.
#Observations Of the 426 sites where the deer forage
O<-as.numeric(c(4,16,61,345))
#Expected number Of the 426 sites where the deer forage
E<-as.numeric(c(20.448,62.622,168.696,174.234))
S<-c(0,0,0,0)
for (i in 1:4){
S[i]<-(O[i]-E[i])^2/E[i]
}
X<-S[1]+S[2]+S[3]+S[4]
X
## [1] 284.0609
6.48 Co???ee and Depression. Researchers conducted a study investigating the relationship between ca???einated co???ee consumption and risk of depression in women. They collected data on 50,739 women free of depression symptoms at the start of the study in the year 1996, and these women were followed through 2006. The researchers used questionnaires to collect data on ca???einated co???ee consumption, asked each individual about physician-diagnosed depression, and also asked about the use of antidepressants. The table below shows the distribution of incidences of depression by amount of ca???einated co???ee consumption.
Ans: Chi-square test.
Ans: H0: No coffee effect on women between physician-diagnosed depression and antidepressants, Ha: there is differecen effect from coffee.
Ans: 5.138% for whom do and 94.8619% for who do not.
expect <-0.05138*6617
x=(373-expect)^2/expect
x
## [1] 3.206716
Ans: less than 0.001.
Ans: Reject H0, there is significan difference of depression in women from coffee.
Ans: Yes, since the test result shows there is significan difference of depression in women by amount of coffee.