.0071
.3336
.9115
.9998
.9987
.9441
.0375
.0009
shadenorm(mu=50, sig=7, above = 35,col = "blue",dens = 150)
shadenorm(mu=50, sig=7, above = 65,col = "blue",dens = 150)
shadenorm(mu=50, sig=7, below = 45,col = "blue",dens = 150)
.8658
.0132
.6985
.1230
96th percentile
4th percentile if you round up
Normal, 80, 2
0.0668
0.0179
0.7969
.3557
Normal, 266, 3.577
.0465
.004
One thing you could conclude could be that the sample maybe was not truly random, but there has been a bias. It could also be that the numbers we are given for the population is not the numbers that represent the real population and our sample therefor shows a different mean.
.9844