From Simio and Simulation: Modeling, Analysis, Applications
An object property is a value that is specified when an object is instantiated in a model. These are input by the user to customize a given object’s behavior. Properties are part of the Object Instance and do not change definition during runtime. Examples would be service time or interarrival time.
In contrast, an object state is a dynamic value that can change during a model’s execution. An object state is part of the Object Runspace and can be associated with an object and the model. States have two categories – Discrete and Continuous.
In this scenario the token’s parent object would be a server object whereas its associated object is a separate object that triggered the process to execute.
| Metric being estimated | Simulation |
|---|---|
| Placement Utilization (\(\rho_p\)) | 0.66763 \(\pm\) 0.0024 |
| Inspection Utilization (\(\rho_i\)) | 0.500536 \(\pm\) 0.0018 |
| Number in system (L) | 1.8487 \(\pm\) 0.0175 |
| Time in system (W) | 0.184631 \(\pm\) 0.0012 |
| Avg Number Good Parts | 9205.4 \(\pm\) 34.5877 |
| Avg Number Bad Parts | 806.32 \(\pm\) 12.3569 |
The results above a consistent with the results listed in Table 5.3
| Metric being estimated | Simulation |
|---|---|
| Placement Utilization (\(\rho_p\)) | 0.666207 \(\pm\) 0.0041 |
| Inspection Utilization (\(\rho_i\)) | 0.497866 \(\pm\) 0.0031 |
| Number in system (L) | 2.99228 \(\pm\) 0.0596 |
| Time in system (W) | 0.299688 \(\pm\) 0.0052 |
| Avg Number Good Parts | 9178.48 \(\pm\) 44.5022 |
| Avg Number Bad Parts | 803.28 \(\pm\) 11.4010 |
Simio model is located here: https://github.com/kfolsom98/DATA604/blob/master/Week6/Model_05_03_B.spfx
The process involves three steps for arriving customers – reception/application; a vision exam; and a written exam.
Assume that customer arrivals are Poisson with a rate of 6 per hour (i.e., interarrival times are exponentially distributed with mean 10 minutes).
The processing time distributions for the three processes are given by Table 5.8.
| Process | Processing time distribution |
|---|---|
| Reception/Application | triangular(5, 8, 11) |
| Vision Exam | triangular(2, 4, 6) |
| Written Exam | triangular(15, 15, 30) |
Assume that the office opens at 9:00 am and closes at 5:00 pm.
Performance Metrics of interest:
On average, we’re seeing a customer spend about 46 minutes in system. Utilization of the reception employee is approximately 78% while the employee manning the vision exam station has a utilization of 38%.
All the computer exam stations have a utilization of 51% - 52% each.
The reception station appears to be the area where the most waiting in queue occurs with an average number in queue at 1.2 customers and a maximum of 5.1 customers.
The vision queue has an average of 0 customers waiting and a maximum of 1 customer. These numbers are similar for the computer stations at 0 and 1, respectively.
I ran 6 different scenarios with increasing numbers of executions from 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2500, annd 3000.
I would feel confident in the results using the 2500 - 3000 range of replications. It’s in this range that we see the half widths begin to converge.
Simio model is located here: https://github.com/kfolsom98/DATA604/blob/master/Week6/Model_05_04.spfx