The objectives of this problem set is to orient you to a number of activities in R. And to conduct a thoughtful exercise in appreciating the importance of data visualization. For each question create a code chunk or text response that completes/answers the activity or question requested. Finally, upon completion name your final output .html file as: YourName_ANLY512-Section-Year-Semester.html and upload it to the “Problem Set 2” assignmenet on Moodle.
anscombe data that is part of the library(datasets) in R. And assign that data to a new object called data.anscombe
## x1 x2 x3 x4 y1 y2 y3 y4
## 1 10 10 10 8 8.04 9.14 7.46 6.58
## 2 8 8 8 8 6.95 8.14 6.77 5.76
## 3 13 13 13 8 7.58 8.74 12.74 7.71
## 4 9 9 9 8 8.81 8.77 7.11 8.84
## 5 11 11 11 8 8.33 9.26 7.81 8.47
## 6 14 14 14 8 9.96 8.10 8.84 7.04
## 7 6 6 6 8 7.24 6.13 6.08 5.25
## 8 4 4 4 19 4.26 3.10 5.39 12.50
## 9 12 12 12 8 10.84 9.13 8.15 5.56
## 10 7 7 7 8 4.82 7.26 6.42 7.91
## 11 5 5 5 8 5.68 4.74 5.73 6.89
data <-anscombe
fBasics() package!)summary(data)
3.Create scatter plots for each \(x, y\) pair of data.
attach(anscombe)
plot( x1, y1, main="Scatter Plot of x1 and y1 data", xlab="x1", ylab="y1")
plot( x2, y2, main="Scatter Plot of x2 and y2 data", xlab="x2", ylab="y2")
plot( x3, y3, main="Scatter Plot of x3 and y3 data", xlab="x3", ylab="y3")
plot( x4, y4, main="Scatter Plot of x4 and y4 data", xlab="x4", ylab="y4")
attach(anscombe)
## The following objects are masked from anscombe (pos = 3):
##
## x1, x2, x3, x4, y1, y2, y3, y4
par(mfrow = c(2,2))
plot( x1, y1, main="Scatter Plot of x1 and y1 data", xlab="x1", ylab="y1", pch=16)
plot( x2, y2, main="Scatter Plot of x2 and y2 data", xlab="x2", ylab="y2", pch=16)
plot( x3, y3, main="Scatter Plot of x3 and y3 data", xlab="x3", ylab="y3", pch=16)
plot( x4, y4, main="Scatter Plot of x4 and y4 data", xlab="x4", ylab="y4", pch=16)
lm() function.lm1 <- lm( x1~y1, data)
summary(lm1)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = x1 ~ y1, data = data)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -2.6522 -1.5117 -0.2657 1.2341 3.8946
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) -0.9975 2.4344 -0.410 0.69156
## y1 1.3328 0.3142 4.241 0.00217 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 2.019 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6665, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6295
## F-statistic: 17.99 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.00217
lm2 <- lm( x2~y2, data)
summary(lm2)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = x2 ~ y2, data = data)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.8516 -1.4315 -0.3440 0.8467 4.2017
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) -0.9948 2.4354 -0.408 0.69246
## y2 1.3325 0.3144 4.239 0.00218 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 2.02 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6662, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6292
## F-statistic: 17.97 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.002179
lm3 <- lm( x3~y3, data)
summary(lm3)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = x3 ~ y3, data = data)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -2.9869 -1.3733 -0.0266 1.3200 3.2133
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) -1.0003 2.4362 -0.411 0.69097
## y3 1.3334 0.3145 4.239 0.00218 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 2.019 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6663, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6292
## F-statistic: 17.97 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.002176
lm4 <- lm( x4~y4, data)
summary(lm4)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = x4 ~ y4, data = data)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -2.7859 -1.4122 -0.1853 1.4551 3.3329
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) -1.0036 2.4349 -0.412 0.68985
## y4 1.3337 0.3143 4.243 0.00216 **
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 2.018 on 9 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.6667, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6297
## F-statistic: 18 on 1 and 9 DF, p-value: 0.002165
par(mfrow= c(2,2))
plot(lm1)
plot(lm2)
plot(lm3)
plot(lm4)
anova(lm1, test="Chisq")
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: x1 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
y1 1 73.32 73.320 17.99 0.00217 ** Residuals 9 36.68 4.076
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(lm2, test="Chisq")
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: x2 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
y2 1 73.287 73.287 17.966 0.002179 ** Residuals 9 36.713 4.079
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(lm3, test="Chisq")
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: x3 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
y3 1 73.296 73.296 17.972 0.002176 ** Residuals 9 36.704 4.078
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
anova(lm4, test="Chisq")
Analysis of Variance Table
Response: x4 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
y4 1 73.338 73.338 18.003 0.002165 ** Residuals 9 36.662 4.074
— Signif. codes: 0 ‘’ 0.001 ’’ 0.01 ’’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1
Learned that these four datasets are similar but have dramatically different graphs. Anscombe’s Quatet makes the dataset easier to be visualized and better understanding the data