Pyrite in the Coastal Everglades, It’s more than Fool’s Gold

Julian, P \(^1\), R. Chambers \(^2\), J. Kominoski \(^3\), T. Troxler \(^3\).

Affiliations:

\(^1\) University of Florida, Soil and Water Sciences, Ft. Pierce, FL, USA.

\(^2\) College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA , USA.

\(^3\) Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.


Introduction

Soil pyrite forms where sulfate reduction and associated fermentation reactions occur during anaerobic decomposition of organic matter. Pyrite is a dynamic soil constituent and is sensitive to oxidation-reduction and oxygen conditions. Temporal changes in the quantity and timing of surface water flow and tidal exchange in the coastal zones influence redox conditions within wetland soils and affect iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) concentrations and interactions.

Schematic of pyrite formation in wetland soil. Adapted from Reddy and DeLaune (2009).
Schematic of pyrite formation in wetland soil. Adapted from Reddy and DeLaune (2009).


Prior studies suggest that the Everglades systems is a pyrite preferred geochemical system. Other metastable Fe-S minerals include mackinawite and greigite which are precursors to the thermodynamically favorable Pyrite.

Objectives

  1. Characterize Fe-S interactions via pyrite formation within the Everglades ecosystem
  2. Evaluate trends in the degree of pyritization (DOP) along regional transects
  3. Investigate DOP response due to sea-level rise within sites in ecotone regions of each transect

Materials and Methods

Data sources

Map
Fig 1. Map of the study area with monitoring locations and ecosystems identified from stations within the Florida Coastal Everglades Long Term Ecological Research network in Everglades National Park.

Data Analysis

\[DOP = \frac{0.5\times [CRS]}{0.5 \times [CRS]+[Fe_{HCl}]}\]

Results

Fig 2. Annual trends in Degree of Pyritization for each flow path and ecosystem. Values expressed as arithmetic mean ± standard error. Grey line indicated by Theil-Sen slope estimate. Trend analysis was performed for all regions and ecosystems, howerver SRS ecotone was the only statistically significant trend (\(\tau\) = 0.60, \(\rho\) <0.01).

Fig 3.Mosaic plot of degree of pyritization site condition categories by flow path (left; \(\chi^2\) = 34.7,df = 6,\(\rho\) <0.01) and ecosystem (right; \(\chi^2\) = 22.0,df = 6, \(\rho\) <0.01) for data collected between 2004 and 2014 (excluding 2008) within Everglades National Park.

Fig 4. Annual mean salinity trend for Shark River Slough, Taylor Slough and Florida Bay between water year 2005 and 2016. Values expressed as arithmetic mean ± standard error. Site SRS5 significantly increased over the period of record (\(\tau\) = 0.45,\(\rho\) <0.05) at a rate of 0.29 PSU Yr\(^{-1}\). All other sites did not exhibit a significant trend.

Fig 5. Water Year mean surface water salinity by degree of pyritization for Shark River Slough, Taylor Slough and Florida Bay. Linear models were developed for all station however SRS5 was the only statistically significant model (R\(^2\) = 0.56; F\(_{(1,10)}\) = 13.0 \(\rho\) <0.01).

Conclusions

Post-hoc conceptual gradient model for degree of pyritization across the ecosystem gradient within Everglades National Park. Based on median DOP values for the period of record aggregated by ecosystem.

References

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the FCE LTER crew for field support. This material was developed in collaboration with the FCE LTER program which is funded by National Science Foundation Grant No. DEB-9910514, Grant No. DBI-0620409, and Grant No. DEB-1237517.


logo