H0: mean1=mean2 ha mean1<mean2
P value = 0.021
The bigger bowl made people eat more, as we reject the null and adopt the hypothesis that size does matter.
Yes, the sample sizes were large and the new scores are several standard deviations below the previous mean, creating a low p value.
No, both smaples were very large so we would expect to have accurate results for the most part.
H0: mean1=mean2 Ha mean1 =/= mean2
p value: 0.973
But if we remove outlier
p value: 0.283
We cannot reject the null with either P value, and conclude that the heats randomly assigned do not affect preformance.
H0: mean1=mean2 ha mean1<mean2
P value: 0.1%
WE reject the null that mean velocity of regular tees equals mean velocity of stinger tees, and instead adopt the conclusion that the stinger tees have a higher average velocity.
doesn’t include zero! so there is a difference
The trials are indepdenent
Trails are not random, but are probably representative
Normal Porbbailty plot is a staight line, so nearly normal.
P-value = 0.0945. We fail to reject H0. These data show no evidence of a difference in mean number of objects recalled.