Grimm follow-up study 2016

lsp

15 février 2017

Orthogonal regression

Tables

Othogonal regression results for raw PM10
	n	Slope	Uncertainty_b	Significance_b	Significance_b_cen	Intercept	Significance_a	Significance_a_cen
Full data set	294	1.174	0.031	S	S	-0.720	N.S	N.S
Angleur	76	1.475	0.053	S	S	-2.970	S	S
Engis	72	1.071	0.054	N.S	S	0.315	N.S	N.S
Herstal	77	1.197	0.042	S	S	-2.284	S	S
Marchienne	69	1.234	0.085	S	S	-1.924	N.S	S
Inf	249	1.435	0.046	S	S	-4.677	S	S
Sup	45	1.263	0.142	N.S	S	-6.605	N.S	S

Othogonal regression results for calibrated PM10
	n	Slope	Uncertainty_b	Significance_b	Significance_b_cen	Intercept	Significance_a	Significance_a_cen
Full data set	294	1.174	0.031	S	S	-3.720	S	S
Angleur	76	1.475	0.053	S	S	-5.970	S	S
Engis	72	1.071	0.054	N.S	S	-2.685	N.S	S
Herstal	77	1.197	0.042	S	S	-5.284	S	S
Marchienne	69	1.234	0.085	S	S	-4.924	S	S
Inf	249	1.435	0.046	S	S	-7.677	S	S
Sup	45	1.263	0.142	N.S	S	-9.605	N.S	S

Othogonal regression results for raw PM25
	n	Slope	Uncertainty_b	Significance_b	Significance_b_cen	Intercept	Significance_a	Significance_a_cen
Full data set	272	1.411	0.039	S	S	-1.299	S	S
Angleur	77	1.707	0.08	S	S	-3.740	S	S
Engis	64	1.180	0.071	S	S	-0.827	N.S	N.S
Herstal	68	1.352	0.066	S	S	-0.772	N.S	N.S
Marchienne	63	1.439	0.07	S	S	0.659	N.S	N.S
Inf	227	1.902	0.069	S	S	-5.386	S	S
Sup	45	2.021	0.19	S	S	-18.170	S	S

Othogonal regression results for calibrated PM25
	n	Slope	Uncertainty_b	Significance_b	Significance_b_cen	Intercept	Significance_a	Significance_a_cen
Full data set	272	1.343	0.037	S	S	-5.073	S	S
Angleur	77	1.619	0.076	S	S	-7.276	S	S
Engis	64	1.129	0.069	N.S	S	-4.812	S	S
Herstal	68	1.282	0.062	S	S	-4.535	S	S
Marchienne	63	1.381	0.066	S	S	-3.290	S	S
Inf	227	1.760	0.065	S	S	-8.532	S	S
Sup	45	1.997	0.188	S	S	-22.635	S	S