From the previous part in the problem, in the field of view, we have G stars at region A,B,C = 80,100,120 pc = 6,10,14 stars. Absolute magnitude of a G star is given as \[ M_{V} \sim N(M_{V,sun},\sigma^2=0.3) \] where \(M_{V,sun}=4.83\).
## [1] "Abs mag of population, by region A,B,C"
## [[1]]
## [1] 3.545208 5.065041 5.107178 4.515202 4.530597 4.520837
##
## [[2]]
## [1] 5.355537 4.769594 4.550109 4.330918 4.371462 6.153207 4.903443
## [8] 4.561240 4.588702 5.081728
##
## [[3]]
## [1] 4.569507 4.441424 4.555450 3.937709 4.190469 3.635943 4.095508
## [8] 4.668809 4.574817 5.623922 4.244680 4.361497 4.676296 4.285378
Sample is obtained from observation. The limitation is that we can observe only stars with \(m_{V} \leq 10\) in any region.
## [1] "Abs mag cutoff, by region A,B,C"
## [1] 5.484550 5.000000 4.604094
## [1] "Abs mag of sample, by region A,B,C"
## [[1]]
## [1] 3.545208 5.065041 5.107178 4.515202 4.530597 4.520837
##
## [[2]]
## [1] 4.769594 4.550109 4.330918 4.371462 4.903443 4.561240 4.588702
##
## [[3]]
## [1] 4.569507 4.441424 4.555450 3.937709 4.190469 3.635943 4.095508
## [8] 4.574817 4.244680 4.361497 4.285378
Calculate mean absolute magnitude of population, and sample. Then, compare.
## [1] "Mean Abs mag of population and sample"
## [1] 4.593714
## [1] 4.427163
Malmquist bias: average absolute magnitude of sample is brighter than of population, because fainter stars are unobservable.
## [1] "Mean distance of sample, given known region"
## [1] 104.1667
## [1] "Apparent magnitude of sample"
## [[1]]
## [1] 8.060658 9.580491 9.622628 9.030652 9.046047 9.036287
##
## [[2]]
## [1] 9.769594 9.550109 9.330918 9.371462 9.903443 9.561240 9.588702
##
## [[3]]
## [1] 9.965413 9.837330 9.951356 9.333615 9.586375 9.031849 9.491414
## [8] 9.970724 9.640587 9.757404 9.681284
## [[1]]
## [1] 44.27226 89.14526 90.89199 69.20387 69.69626 69.38369
##
## [[2]]
## [1] 97.25654 87.90665 79.46640 80.96409 103.44003 88.35844 89.48297
##
## [[3]]
## [1] 106.43455 100.33813 105.74776 79.56517 89.38712 69.24204 85.56237
## [8] 106.69516 91.64680 96.71208 93.38062
## [1] 4.569507 4.441424 4.555450 3.937709 4.190469 3.635943 4.095508
## [8] 4.574817 4.244680 4.361497 4.285378
## [1] "Mean distance of sample, given known G star, but unknown region"
## [1] 86.84084
Malmquist bias: given the field of view and star type, more number of stars is at closer range, and less number is at further range. Hence, the mean distance would be biasly close.
## [1] "Metallicity / Metallicity of Sun"
## [[1]]
## [1] 0.06368793 0.06368793 0.06368793 0.06368793 0.06368793 0.06754736
##
## [[2]]
## [1] 0.07371645 0.06368793 0.07371645 0.06544124 0.06368793 0.06754736
## [7] 0.07371645 0.07371645 0.06368793 0.07371645
##
## [[3]]
## [1] 0.06368793 0.06368793 0.07018502 0.06368793 0.06544124 0.06368793
## [7] 0.06368793 0.06368793 0.07371645 0.06368793 0.06368793 0.07371645
## [13] 0.06368793 0.06544124
## [1] "Absoluate magnitude of population with metallicity"
## [[1]]
## [1] 3.427336 4.947169 4.989306 4.397330 4.412725 4.426121
##
## [[2]]
## [1] 5.297835 4.651722 4.492407 4.223565 4.253590 6.058492 4.845742
## [8] 4.503539 4.470830 5.024026
##
## [[3]]
## [1] 4.451635 4.323551 4.476560 3.819836 4.083116 3.518071 3.977635
## [8] 4.550936 4.517116 5.506049 4.126808 4.303796 4.558424 4.178025
## [1] "Absoluate magnitude of sample with metallicity"
## [[1]]
## [1] 3.427336 4.947169 4.989306 4.397330 4.412725 4.426121
##
## [[2]]
## [1] 4.651722 4.492407 4.223565 4.253590 4.845742 4.503539 4.470830
##
## [[3]]
## [1] 4.451635 4.323551 4.476560 3.819836 4.083116 3.518071 3.977635
## [8] 4.550936 4.517116 4.126808 4.303796 4.558424 4.178025
## [1] "Mean Z of sample in region B,C / Metallicity of Sun"
## [1] 0.06678291
## [1] "Metallicity of all stars in the sky / Metallicity of Sun"
## [1] 0.06667711
Notice that they are about equal.