Some useful information

This is a summary of a set of 9 experiments I ran on Cranium using a single pipe workflow file that performs 3000 independent jobs, each one with the CBDA-SL and the knockoff filter feature mining strategies. Each experiments has a total of 9000 jobs and is uniquely identified by 6 input arguments: # of jobs [M], % of missing values [misValperc], min [Kcol_min] and max [Kcol_max] % for FSR-Feature Sampling Range, min [Nrow_min] and max [Nrow_max] % for SSR-Subject Sampling Range.

This document has the final results, by experiment. The CBDA-SuperLearner has been adapted to a multinomial outcome distribution in this case. See https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5sz_T_1CNJQWmlsRTZEcjBEOEk/view?ths=true for some general documentation of the CBDA-SL project and github https://github.com/SOCR/CBDA for some of the code [still in progress].

# # Here I load the dataset [not executed]
# ADNI_dataset = read.csv("C:/Users/simeonem/Documents/CBDA-SL/Cranium/ADNI_dataset.txt",header = TRUE)

Features selected by both the knockoff filter and the CBDA-SL algorithms are shown as spikes in the histograms shown below. No False Discovery Rates are shown (since we don’t have information on the “true” features). I list the top features selected, set to 20 here.

## Loading required package: lattice
## Loading required package: ggplot2
## [1] EXPERIMENT 1
##          M misValperc   Kcol_min   Kcol_max   Nrow_min   Nrow_max 
##       9000          0          5         15         60         80

## [1] "TABLE with CBDA-SL & KNOCKOFF FILTER RESULTS"
##  CBDA Frequency Density  Knockoff Density 
##  20   10        2.985075  7       2.243323
##  60    9        2.686567  6       2.176855
##  1     8        2.388060  2       2.167359
##  29    8        2.388060  4       2.136499
##  31    8        2.388060  1       2.091395
##  37    8        2.388060  9       2.091395
##  41    8        2.388060  3       2.058160
##  44    8        2.388060 10       2.053412
##  56    8        2.388060  8       2.024926
##  2     7        2.089552  5       1.984570
##  10    7        2.089552 59       1.984570
##  19    7        2.089552 42       1.956083
##  23    7        2.089552 60       1.948961
##  54    7        2.089552 51       1.846884
##  55    7        2.089552 39       1.832641
## [1] "Top Features Selected across multiple experiments,shared between CBDA-SL and Knockoff filter"
## [1]  1  2 10
## [1] "subjectSex" "MMSCORE"    "Background"

The features listed above are then used to run a final analysis applying both the CBDA-SL and the knockoff filter. The ONLY features used for analysis are the ones listed above. A final summary of the accuracy of the overall procedure is determined by using the CDBA-SL object on the subset of subjects held off for prediction. The predictions (SL_Pred_Combined) is then used to generate the confusion matrix. By doing so, we combined the CBDA-SL & Knockoff Filter algorithms to first select the top features during the first stage. Then, the second stage uses the top common features selected to run a final predictive modeling step that can ultimately be tested for accuracy, sensitivity,…..

## Confusion Matrix and Statistics
## 
##           Reference
## Prediction  AD LMCI MCI Normal
##     AD     112    9  16      0
##     LMCI     3  182  24      5
##     MCI      7   12 151      2
##     Normal   0    6   4    217
## 
## Overall Statistics
##                                           
##                Accuracy : 0.8827          
##                  95% CI : (0.8575, 0.9048)
##     No Information Rate : 0.2987          
##     P-Value [Acc > NIR] : < 2.2e-16       
##                                           
##                   Kappa : 0.8416          
##  Mcnemar's Test P-Value : NA              
## 
## Statistics by Class:
## 
##                      Class: AD Class: LMCI Class: MCI Class: Normal
## Sensitivity             0.9180      0.8708     0.7744        0.9688
## Specificity             0.9602      0.9409     0.9622        0.9810
## Pos Pred Value          0.8175      0.8505     0.8779        0.9559
## Neg Pred Value          0.9837      0.9496     0.9239        0.9866
## Prevalence              0.1627      0.2787     0.2600        0.2987
## Detection Rate          0.1493      0.2427     0.2013        0.2893
## Detection Prevalence    0.1827      0.2853     0.2293        0.3027
## Balanced Accuracy       0.9391      0.9058     0.8683        0.9749