It has been claimed that gender differences in academic fields results from stereotypes about how difficult the fields are (Leslie, 2015). This is based on the finding that percetions of brilliance requirement of different fields correlated strongly with the gender distribution. It apparently did not dawn on the people making this claim that the stereotypes were probably very accurate: people who study physics really are smarter than those who study psychology. Indeed, that gender differences related to actual difficulties of fields, as measured by mean cognitive/scholastic scores by those studying them, was shown by Scott Alexander shortly after the study was published and Randy Olson a year before it was published. However, it was also shown in 2002, 13 years before ‘Perceptions of Brilliance’ in a not well known paper by Templer and Tomeo from 2002.
They collected combined GRE scores for 46 fields as well the the percent Male for the graduates of PHD programs. The data looks like this:
## Program Mean Percent.male
## 1 Physics and Astronomy 1903 87.59
## 2 Material Engineering 1840 83.29
## 3 Mathematics 1835 78.13
## 4 Chemical Engineering 1820 84.44
## 5 Philosophy 1811 72.09
## 6 Economics 1795 75.95
## 7 Other Engineering 1786 89.70
## 8 Chemistry 1764 71.87
## 9 Computer and Information Technology 1762 84.57
## 10 Mechanical Engineering 1762 93.01
## 11 Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1760 90.54
## 12 Civil Engineering 1718 89.40
## 13 Earth, Atmosphere and Marine 1704 75.43
## 14 Biological Science 1688 59.33
## 15 Industrial Engineering 1676 84.98
## 16 Natural Science and Other 1666 59.56
## 17 English Language Literature 1665 35.53
## 18 Bank and Linance 1662 82.81
## 19 History 1659 62.77
## 20 Anthropology and Archaeology 1654 46.29
## 21 Political Science 1645 71.10
## 22 Arts History, Theory and Criticism 1638 39.01
## 23 Secondary Education 1623 37.50
## 24 Architecture and Environmental Design 1622 80.00
## 25 Agriculture 1619 76.84
## 26 Foreign Language Literature 1612 29.94
## 27 Library and Archival Science 1574 31.11
## 28 Arts Performance and Studio 1563 55.50
## 29 Curriculum and Instruction 1545 32.65
## 30 Psychology 1536 37.78
## 31 Sociology 1523 49.25
## 32 Health and Medical Science 1509 41.48
## 33 Education Evaluation and Research 1505 28.57
## 34 Communications 1505 51.04
## 35 Business Administration and Management 1480 74.93
## 36 Other Social Science 1477 54.43
## 37 Elementary Education 1475 20.88
## 38 Accounting 1466 53.97
## 39 Education Other 1460 34.58
## 40 Public Administration 1443 66.22
## 41 Education Administration 1430 45.18
## 42 Special Education 1410 17.53
## 43 Student Counseling and Personnel Services 1405 35.44
## 44 Home Economics 1406 25.76
## 45 Social Work 1385 30.50
## 46 Early Childhood Education 1376 3.23
Plotting the two variables:
GG_scatter(d, "Mean", "Percent.male", case_names_vector = d$Program) +
xlab("Mean GRE score (V+Q)") + ylab("Percent male PHD graduates") +
scale_y_continuous(limits = c(0, 100)) + scale_x_continuous(limits = c(1300, 1950))
As might be expected, these findings are related to the median income of the academic majors too.