PopulationSW<-c(66,40,30,30,31,26,20,20,21,21,23,24,15,17,18,10,10,11,11,13,14,14,14,14,6,9,9,9,1)
boxplot(PopulationSW, main ="Poplation Growth SW", col = "magenta")
summary(PopulationSW)
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 1.00 11.00 15.00 18.86 23.00 66.00
PopulationNE<-c(12,11,10,10,9,9,9,9,8,8,7,6,6,5,5,4,4,3,1)
boxplot(PopulationNE, main ="Poplation Growth NE", col = "blue")
summary(PopulationNE)
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 1.000 5.000 8.000 7.158 9.000 12.000
It’s abundently clear from the boxplots shown that the number of cylyders a car has is inversely proportional to how fuel effecient it is. That is to say the lower the cylinders, the higher the MPG. This is shown where mean MPG per 4 clyinder cars is 32 mpg, while for 8 cylinder cars its around 17 mpg.
Class 1 = A / Class 2 = B / Class 3 = C
It appears thatthe data is slightly left skewed since the mean is lower than the median.
No
PercentOntime<-c(43.3,87.4,69.9,59,15,74.75)
boxplot(PercentOntime, main ="% ontime", col = "yellow")
Median ~36
Q1~34.5 Q2~36.5
Range 6 / IQR~2
Derrrbyyy<-c(31,38,34.5,36.5,36)
boxplot(Derrrbyyy, main ="Derby speeds", col = "red")