The goal of this case study is to analyze if bobblehead promotions increase attendance at Dodgers home games. Using the fitted predictive model we can predict the attendance for the game in the forthcomming season and we can predict the attendance with or without bobblehead promotion.
The motivation of this case study is to:
Load the required libraries
library(car) # Package with Special functions for linear regression
library(lattice) # Graphics Package
library(ggplot2) # Graphical Package
Load the data into a data frame from the csv file. (This is just a sample data and not the entire dataset)
# Create a dataframe with Dodgers Data
DodgersData <- read.csv("DodgersData.csv")
Evaluate the Structure and Re-Level the factor variables for “Day Of Week”" and “Month”" in the right order
# Check the structure for Dorder Data
str(DodgersData)
## 'data.frame': 81 obs. of 12 variables:
## $ month : Factor w/ 7 levels "APR","AUG","JUL",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ day : int 10 11 12 13 14 15 23 24 25 27 ...
## $ attend : int 56000 29729 28328 31601 46549 38359 26376 44014 26345 44807 ...
## $ day_of_week: Factor w/ 7 levels "Friday","Monday",..: 6 7 5 1 3 4 2 6 7 1 ...
## $ opponent : Factor w/ 17 levels "Angels","Astros",..: 13 13 13 11 11 11 3 3 3 10 ...
## $ temp : int 67 58 57 54 57 65 60 63 64 66 ...
## $ skies : Factor w/ 2 levels "Clear ","Cloudy": 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 ...
## $ day_night : Factor w/ 2 levels "Day","Night": 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 ...
## $ cap : Factor w/ 2 levels "NO","YES": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ shirt : Factor w/ 2 levels "NO","YES": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ fireworks : Factor w/ 2 levels "NO","YES": 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 ...
## $ bobblehead : Factor w/ 2 levels "NO","YES": 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
# Evaluate the factor levels for day_of_week
# levels(DodgersData$day_of_week)
# Reorder the factor levels for day_of_week
DodgersData$day_of_week <- factor(DodgersData$day_of_week, levels = c("Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday", "Sunday"))
# Evaluate the factor levels for month
# levels(DodgersData$month)
# Reorder the factor levels for month
DodgersData$month <- factor(DodgersData$month, levels = c("APR", "MAY", "JUN", "JUL", "AUG", "SEP", "OCT"))
The sample Major League Baseball data from 2012 season shown below
# First 10 rows of the data frame
head(DodgersData, 10)
## month day attend day_of_week opponent temp skies day_night cap shirt
## 1 APR 10 56000 Tuesday Pirates 67 Clear Day NO NO
## 2 APR 11 29729 Wednesday Pirates 58 Cloudy Night NO NO
## 3 APR 12 28328 Thursday Pirates 57 Cloudy Night NO NO
## 4 APR 13 31601 Friday Padres 54 Cloudy Night NO NO
## 5 APR 14 46549 Saturday Padres 57 Cloudy Night NO NO
## 6 APR 15 38359 Sunday Padres 65 Clear Day NO NO
## 7 APR 23 26376 Monday Braves 60 Cloudy Night NO NO
## 8 APR 24 44014 Tuesday Braves 63 Cloudy Night NO NO
## 9 APR 25 26345 Wednesday Braves 64 Cloudy Night NO NO
## 10 APR 27 44807 Friday Nationals 66 Clear Night NO NO
## fireworks bobblehead
## 1 NO NO
## 2 NO NO
## 3 NO NO
## 4 YES NO
## 5 NO NO
## 6 NO NO
## 7 NO NO
## 8 NO NO
## 9 NO NO
## 10 YES NO
The data shows that in 2012 there were a few promotions
We have data from April to October for games played in the Day or Night under Clear or Cloudy Skys.
Dodger Stadium has a capacity of about 56,000. Looking at the entire (sample) data shows that the stadium filled up only twice in 2012. There were only two cap promotions, three shirt promotions - not enough data for any inferences. Fireworks and Bobblehead promotions have happened a few times.
Further more there were eleven bobble head promotions and most of then (six) being on Tuesday nights.
## Box plot to explore attendance by day of week
plot(DodgersData$day_of_week, DodgersData$attend / 1000, main = "Dodgers Attendence By Day Of Week", xlab = "Day of Week", ylab = "Attendance (thousands)", col = "violet", las = 1)
Tuesday seems to be the high attendance day as the median line seems to be the highest. Can this be because of the promotion that happened mostly Tuesdays? Let us see.
## Box plot to explore attendance by Month
plot(DodgersData$month, DodgersData$attend / 1000, main = "Dodgers Attendence By Month", xlab = "Month",
ylab = "Attendance (thousands)", col = "light blue", las = 1)
June seems to be the month of high attendance as the median line is the highest.
#Evaluate attendance by weather
ggplot(DodgersData, aes(x=temp, y=attend/1000, color=fireworks)) +
geom_point() +
facet_wrap(day_night~skies) +
ggtitle("Dodgers Attendance By Temperature By Time of Game and Skies") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(lineheight=3, face="bold", color="black", size=10)) +
xlab("Temperature (Degree Farenheit)") +
ylab("Attendance (Thousands)")
On day games with clear skies we see that when the temperature the attendance seems to be low. Also only one day game was played under cloudy skies.
#Strip Plot of Attendance by opponent or visiting team
ggplot(DodgersData, aes(x=attend/1000, y=opponent, color=day_night)) +
geom_point() +
ggtitle("Dodgers Attendance By Opponent") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(lineheight=3, face="bold", color="black", size=10)) +
xlab("Attendance (Thousands)") +
ylab("Opponent (Visiting Team)")
Games with opponents from large metropolitan areas show higher attendance consistently.
To advise the management if promotions impact attendance we will need to identify if there is a positive effect, and if there is a positive effect how much of an effect it is.
To provide this advice I built a Linear Model for predicting attendance using Month, Day Of Week and the indicator variable Bobblehead promotion. I split the data into Training and Test to create the model
# Create a model with the bobblehead variable entered last
my.model <- {attend ~ month + day_of_week + bobblehead}
# Prepare a Training and Test dataset
# Reseed for repeatability
set.seed(1234)
training_test <- c(rep(1, trunc((2/3)*nrow(DodgersData))), rep(2, trunc((1/3)*nrow(DodgersData))))
# sample(training_test)
# Create a variable in DodgersData data frame to identify Test and Training row
DodgersData$Training_Test <- sample(training_test)
DodgersData$Training_Test <- factor(DodgersData$Training_Test, levels = c(1, 2), labels = c("TRAIN", "TEST"))
DodgersData.Train <- subset(DodgersData, Training_Test == "TRAIN")
DodgersData.Test <- subset(DodgersData, Training_Test == "TEST")
#head(DodgersData.Train)
#head(DodgersData.Test)
Fit the model on the Training Data and predict the model on the test set
# Fit model to training set
train.model.fit <- lm(my.model, data = DodgersData.Train)
# Predict from Training Set
DodgersData.Train$Predict_Attend <- predict(train.model.fit)
# Evaluate The Fitted Model on the Test Set
DodgersData.Test$Predict_Attend <- predict(train.model.fit, newdata = DodgersData.Test)
#round(cor(DodgersData.Test$attend, DodgersData.Test$Predict_Attend)^2, digits=3)
# compute the proportion of response variance accounted for when predicting Test Data
cat("\n","Proportion of Test Set Variance Accounted for: ", round(cor(DodgersData.Test$attend, DodgersData.Test$Predict_Attend)^2, digits=3), "\n", sep="")
##
## Proportion of Test Set Variance Accounted for: 0.453
DodgersData.Training_Test <- rbind(DodgersData.Train, DodgersData.Test)
ggplot(DodgersData.Training_Test, aes(x=attend/1000, y=Predict_Attend/1000, color=bobblehead)) +
geom_point() +
geom_line(data = data.frame(x = c(25,60), y = c(25,60)), aes(x = x, y = y), colour = "red") +
facet_wrap(~Training_Test) +
#geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE) +
ggtitle("Regression Model Performance : Bobblehead and Attendance") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(lineheight=3, face="bold", color="black", size=10)) +
xlab("Actual Attendance (Thousands)") +
ylab("Predicted Attendance (Thousands)")
The scatter plot displays that tmodel fit to the training set holds up when used with the test data.
Run the model on the entire Dodgers Data Set
# use the full data set to obtain an estimate of the increase in
# attendance due to bobbleheads, controlling for other factors
my.model.fit <- lm(my.model, data = DodgersData) # use all available data
print(summary(my.model.fit))
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = my.model, data = DodgersData)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -10786.5 -3628.1 -516.1 2230.2 14351.0
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 33909.16 2521.81 13.446 < 2e-16 ***
## monthMAY -2385.62 2291.22 -1.041 0.30152
## monthJUN 7163.23 2732.72 2.621 0.01083 *
## monthJUL 2849.83 2578.60 1.105 0.27303
## monthAUG 2377.92 2402.91 0.990 0.32593
## monthSEP 29.03 2521.25 0.012 0.99085
## monthOCT -662.67 4046.45 -0.164 0.87041
## day_of_weekTuesday 7911.49 2702.21 2.928 0.00466 **
## day_of_weekWednesday 2460.02 2514.03 0.979 0.33134
## day_of_weekThursday 775.36 3486.15 0.222 0.82467
## day_of_weekFriday 4883.82 2504.65 1.950 0.05537 .
## day_of_weekSaturday 6372.06 2552.08 2.497 0.01500 *
## day_of_weekSunday 6724.00 2506.72 2.682 0.00920 **
## bobbleheadYES 10714.90 2419.52 4.429 3.59e-05 ***
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 6120 on 67 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.5444, Adjusted R-squared: 0.456
## F-statistic: 6.158 on 13 and 67 DF, p-value: 2.083e-07
cat("\n","Estimated Effect of Bobblehead Promotion on Attendance: ", round(my.model.fit$coefficients[length(my.model.fit$coefficients)], digits = 0),"\n",sep="")
##
## Estimated Effect of Bobblehead Promotion on Attendance: 10715
From the stats above we see that there is a positive impact on bobblehead promotions on attendance with a potential increase in attendance by 10,715 fans per game.
Looking at the fitted model we can predict the attendance for the game in forthcomming season with and without the bobblehead promotions. If we combine the financial criteria along with the statistical findings we can compute the Dodgers revenue with and without the bobble head promotion.
Modeling Techniques in Predictive Analysis - Thomas W. Miller
“Thanks for this wonderful book.”