• Intoduction and demo of the tool
• Design and development
• Uses of the PCT

Propensity to cycle refers to the modelled uptake of cycling at area, desire line and route network levels under different scenarios of the future. Policy relevant scenarios include meeting national or local targets, the potential uptake if people in the study area cycled as much as the Dutch do or the impact of electric bikes on people's willingness to cycle longer distances. (see Get Britain Cycling article, 2016)

The tool aims to help prioritise where interventions are most needed based on where cyclable trips are most common

“The PCT shows the country’s great potential to get on their bikes, highlights the areas of highest possible growth and will be a useful innovation for local authorities to get the greatest bang for their buck from cycling investments  and realise cycling potential.” Andrew Jones, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport

“A world first from a brilliant academic team. As a Department we should be celebrating this example of innovation in promoting the UK’s capability to deliver innovation in transport planning.” Pauline Reeves, DfT Deputy Director Sustainable Accessible Transport

“The PCT provides evidence that is required in justifying the merits of policy and project decisions. The identification of unmet demand for cycling will support future funding bids and negotiations to deliver key cycle projects. Tunbridge Wells Borough Council is very pleased to have been part of the development of the tool.” Bartholomew Wren, Royal Tunbridge Wells

“Initial outputs from the PCT for Cornwall have already been useful in evidencing that our relatively hilly area has good cycling potential, concentrated in specific areas. The areas we are focusing capital investment e.g. Bodmin are indicated as having high potential, despite low current cycling. Given the greater potential under the E-bike scenario, we will be exploring ways to make this option more affordable.” Victoria Fraser, Team Leader, Cornwall Council "ECF is pleased to support the PCT and its international potential to use data for the development of bicycle policies" Randy Rzewnicki, European Cycling Federation

See http://pct.bike/

Disjointed networks

Source: PhD Thesis "The Energy Costs of Commuting" (Lovelace, 2014).

• James Woodcock (Principal Investigator, Cambridge University)
• Anna Goodman (Lead Data Analyst, LSHTM)
• Rachel Aldred (Implementation Lead, Westminster University)
• Robin Lovelace (Lead Developer, University of Leeds)
• Ali Abbas (User Interface, University of Cambridge)
• Alvaro Ullrich (Data Management, University of Cambridge)
• Nikolai Berkoff (System Architecture, Independent Developer)

See Lovelace, Goodman et al. (2016) for details

• See github.com/npct/pct-shiny/milestones to track the PCT's development

• Build and test a prototype model
• Identify 'desire lines' of greatest potential
• Make the tool scalable nationally
• Create a website that will make the Propensity to Cycle Tool a publicly accessible resource

Version 1 - nationwide (V1 launch: June 2016)

• ~Route-allocated hilliness, network layer~
• ~Include health outcomes (HEAT)~
• ~National-level results~
• V1.5 - smaller (LSOA) zones (Jan 2017)
• Training

Version 2 - local deployment

• Include non-commute trips
• Compatibility with Local Authority trip demand models
• Micro-level analysis (V 2.2)

• We wanted to ensure that our work was reproducible
• So we created an R package, stplanr, that enables others to reproduce the results
• This has been downloaded over 3,000 time by researchers around the world

• Strategic network planning
• Public engagement
• 'Visioning'
• Estimating health and carbon benefits of uptake
• Overlay demand for cycling with supply of safe infrastructure, e.g. to inform Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIP) (credit: Adrian Lord)
• Providing ready made mappable data (via data download)

• Creating local builds and informing local targets and
• Modelling impacts of new developments
• Crowd-sourced transport planning (e.g. by integrating data from 'citizens as sensors' and Cycling Environment Assessment Tool)
• A global PCT?

Which cities are these? What's the difference?

Source: Lovelace and Whittle (in press)

• The PCT provides an evidence base about where to intervene
• Freely available for all to use
• Open source and transparent
• Complements local knowledge, tools and data
• Should help get people on same page

Local 'build' for the local authority

• Thanks to the institutions behind the PCT team: Universities of Cambridge, Leeds and Westminster.

• The PCT was delivered in partnership with Brook Lyndhurst (Phase I) and Atkins (Phase II).

• Thanks to CycleStreets.net and everyone who has contributed

• Thanks to the Department for Transport for funding and especially to Shane Snow for commissioning the tool, and for support and feedback.

• See @robinlovelace for updates from me!

Lovelace, Robin, Richard Ellison, Barry Rowlingson, and Nick Bearman. Stplanr: Sustainable Transport Planning, 2016. https://github.com/ropensci/stplanr.

Lovelace, Robin. 2016. "Mapping out the future of cycling." Get Britain Cycling, 2016. P. 22 - 24. Available from getbritaincycling.net

Lovelace, Robin, Anna Goodman, Rachel Aldred, Nikolai Berkoff, Ali Abbas, and James Woodcock. “The Propensity to Cycle Tool: An Open Source Online System for Sustainable Transport Planning.” arXiv:1509.04425 [Cs], 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.04425.