# Load packages
# Core
library(tidyverse)
library(tidyquant)
Calculate and visualize your portfolio’s beta.
Choose your stocks and the baseline market.
from 2012-12-31 to present
symbols <- c ("DLR", "NVDA", "GOOG", "MSFT", "AMZN")
prices <- tq_get(x = symbols,
get = "stockprices",
from = "2012-12-31",
to = "2026-11-02")
asset_returns_tbl <- prices %>%
group_by(symbol) %>%
tq_transmute(select = adjusted,
mutate_fun = periodReturn,
period = "monthly",
type = "log") %>%
slice(-1) %>%
ungroup() %>%
set_names(c("asset", "date", "returns"))
# symbols
symbols <- asset_returns_tbl %>% distinct(asset) %>% pull()
symbols
## [1] "AMZN" "DLR" "GOOG" "MSFT" "NVDA"
# weights
weights <- c(0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2)
weights
## [1] 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
w_tbl <- tibble(symbols, weights)
w_tbl
## # A tibble: 5 Ă— 2
## symbols weights
## <chr> <dbl>
## 1 AMZN 0.2
## 2 DLR 0.2
## 3 GOOG 0.2
## 4 MSFT 0.2
## 5 NVDA 0.2
# ?tq_portfolio
portfolio_returns_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
tq_portfolio(assets_col = asset,
returns_col = returns,
weights = w_tbl,
rebalance_on = "quarters",
col_rename = "returns")
portfolio_returns_tbl
## # A tibble: 166 Ă— 2
## date returns
## <date> <dbl>
## 1 2013-01-31 0.0301
## 2 2013-02-28 0.0201
## 3 2013-03-28 0.0101
## 4 2013-04-30 0.0516
## 5 2013-05-31 0.0164
## 6 2013-06-28 0.00167
## 7 2013-07-31 -0.0124
## 8 2013-08-30 -0.00816
## 9 2013-09-30 0.0336
## 10 2013-10-31 0.0489
## # ℹ 156 more rows
market_returns_tbl <- tq_get(x = "SPY",
get = "stockprices",
from = "2012-12-31",
to = "2017-12-31") %>%
# Convert prices to returns
tq_transmute(select = adjusted,
mutate_fun = periodReturn,
period = "monthly",
type = "log",
col_name = "returns") %>%
slice(-1)
portfolio_market_returns_tbl <- left_join(market_returns_tbl,
portfolio_returns_tbl,
by = "date") %>%
set_names("date", "market_returns", "portfolio_returns")
portfolio_market_returns_tbl %>%
tq_performance(Ra = portfolio_returns,
Rb = market_returns,
performance_fun = CAPM.beta)
## # A tibble: 1 Ă— 1
## CAPM.beta.1
## <dbl>
## 1 0.861
portfolio_market_returns_tbl %>%
ggplot(aes(x = market_returns,
y = portfolio_returns)) +
geom_point(color = "cornflowerblue") +
geom_smooth(method= "lm", se = FALSE,
size = 1.5, color = tidyquant::palette_light()[3]) +
labs(y = "Portfolio Returns",
x = "Market Returns")
actual_fitted_long_tbl <- portfolio_market_returns_tbl %>%
# Linear Regression Model
lm(portfolio_returns ~ market_returns, data = .) %>%
# Get fitted and actual returns
broom::augment() %>%
# Add date
mutate(date = portfolio_market_returns_tbl$date) %>%
select(date, portfolio_returns, .fitted) %>%
# Transform data to long
pivot_longer(cols = c(portfolio_returns, .fitted),
names_to = "type",
values_to = "returns")
actual_fitted_long_tbl %>%
ggplot(aes(x = date,
y = returns,
color = type))+
geom_line()
How sensitive is your portfolio to the market? Discuss in terms of the beta coefficient. Does the plot confirm the beta coefficient you calculated? My portfolio is less sensitive to market movements, with a beta of 0.861. This means that my portfolio generally moves in the same direction as the market, but its returns are smaller on average. For example, if the market increases by 1%, my portfolio is expected to increase by approximately 0.861%. The scatterplot confirms this because the regression line has a positive slope, showing that the portfolio and market move in the same direction. Each dot represents one month’s returns, while the regression line shows the average relationship between market returns and portfolio returns. Since the dots are not all directly on the line, the portfolio does not move exactly according to the beta every month, but the overall relationship supports the calculated beta.