According to McCombs and Shaw, agenda-setting theory posits that issues that receive greater attention in the news media often become more prominent in the public mind. In first-level agenda-setting, topics compete for salience in the media agenda, where differences in media attention often shape what audiences perceive as important issues. Therefore, examining differences in coverage volume between vaccine-preventable outbreaks and food recalls provides a means of comparing topic salience in the media agenda.
Using the phenomenon as a guide, my project will compare the media agenda salience of two issues: vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks and food recalls and contamination events. Specifically, this analysis will compare the number of stories per week that MediaCloud.org’s United States - National news archive collected for each topic over one year, from October 19, 2025, through October 18, 2026.
The results will enhance understanding of how two human health issues compete for attention in the media agenda.
Between October 2025 and October 2026, average weekly coverage volume differed across vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks and food recall and contamination events.
The independent variable was public health issue type, categorized as either vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks or food recalls and contamination events. The dependent variable was media salience, operationalized as the weekly number of news stories retrieved via MediaCloud.org queries for each issue. The weeks analyzed were October 19, 2025, through October 18, 2026.
Stories about the vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks were operationalized with the following MediaCloud query:
vaccine_query <- “((measles OR mumps OR pertussis OR whooping cough) AND (outbreak* OR cases OR vaccine* OR infection* OR transmission OR MMR OR measles vaccine))”
Stories about the food recalls and contamination events were operationalized with the following MediaCloud query:
food_query <- “((cyclospora OR salmonella OR listeria OR e.coli) AND (food recall* OR recalled food OR recall OR recalls OR contamination OR foodborne illness OR food safety OR produce))”
Eventually, I will use a paired-samples t-test to assess the statistical significance of the difference in coverage volume between the two topics.
The figure and table below display each topic’s weekly coverage volume across the period analyzed. Food recalls received substantially more media attention than vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks. Food recall coverage surged in July and August 2026, reaching its highest level during the study period. Vaccine-preventable disease outbreak coverage remained relatively low and stable, with a notable spike occurring in early January 2026. Overall, food recalls and contamination events received more than twice as much coverage as vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks.
| topic | Total_Stories | Weekly_Minimum | Weekly_Maximum | Weekly_Median | Weekly_Mean | Weekly_SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food recall and contamination events | 3515 | 1 | 465 | 28 | 66.32 | 97.65 |
| Vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks | 1407 | 1 | 121 | 23 | 26.55 | 18.26 |
This analysis examined media coverage from October 2025 to October 2026. Preliminary analysis reveals a notable increase in coverage of food recall and contamination events beginning around June 21, 2026. This shift had the potential to influence overall results; the data set was divided into pre- and post-June 21, 2026 periods, and separate paired-samples t-tests were conducted for each period.
The results and data below summarize the distributions of weekly story counts between vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks (V1) and food recall and contamination events (V2).
The paired-samples t-test assumptions were not met for this period (October 19, 2025 to June 21, 2026), resulting in a non-normal distribution of pairs and a p-value of 0.0004 on the normality test. Therefore, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the period instead.
The test showed no statistically significant difference in weekly coverage for these topics (p-value = .8122). The average weekly coverage for the topics of food recalls and contamination events (M=28.77, SD=17.60) and vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks (M=29.83, SD=18.93) was nearly identical. Thus, the hypothesis was not supported in this period, suggesting that both topics occupied similar positions on the media agenda prior to June 2026.
One notable finding is that although the Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated no significant difference in overall topic salience during the period, the distribution of pair differences indicates that the two topics frequently alternated in dominance over the other. Weekly coverage levels crossed multiple times with one topic receiving greater media attention than the other, despite having nearly identical averages observed in the data set.
| Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk) | ||
| statistic | p.value | method |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8612 | 0.0004 | Shapiro-Wilk normality test |
| If the P.VALUE is 0.05 or less, the number of pairs is fewer than 40, and the distribution of pair differences shows obvious non-normality or outliers, consider using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test results instead of the Paired-Samples t-Test results. | ||
| Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test | ||
| statistic | p.value | method |
|---|---|---|
| 330.0000 | 0.8122 | Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction |
| Group Means and SDs (Wilcoxon) | |||
| V1_Mean | V2_Mean | V1_SD | V2_SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.829 | 28.771 | 18.933 | 17.597 |
The paired-samples t-test assumptions were not met for this period (June 21, 2026 to October 18, 2026), resulting in a non-normal distribution of pairs and a p-value of 0.0118 on the normality test. Therefore, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the period instead.
The test revealed a statistically significant difference in weekly coverage between the two topics (p-value = 0.0024). Food recall and contamination events (M=139.33, SD=141.43) received substantially greater weekly coverage than vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks (M=20.17, SD=15.44). Consistent with first-level agenda-setting theory, these findings suggest that food recalls were a more salient topic in the media during this period. These findings support the hypothesis for this period, given the notable jump in food recall and contamination events.
| Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk) | ||
| statistic | p.value | method |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8591 | 0.0118 | Shapiro-Wilk normality test |
| If the P.VALUE is 0.05 or less, the number of pairs is fewer than 40, and the distribution of pair differences shows obvious non-normality or outliers, consider using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test results instead of the Paired-Samples t-Test results. | ||
| Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test | ||
| statistic | p.value | method |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0000 | 0.0024 | Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction |