# Load packages
# Core
library(tidyverse)
library(tidyquant)
Visualize and examine changes in the underlying trend in the performance of your portfolio in terms of Sharpe Ratio.
Choose your stocks.
from 2012-12-31 to present
symbols <- c ("AAPL", "NVDA", "F", "WMT", "MU")
prices <- tq_get(x = symbols,
get = "stockprices",
from = "2012-12-31",
to = "2017-12-31")
asset_returns_tbl <- prices %>%
group_by(symbol) %>%
tq_transmute(select = adjusted,
mutate_fun = periodReturn,
period = "monthly",
type = "log") %>%
slice(-1) %>%
ungroup() %>%
set_names(c("asset", "date", "returns"))
# symbols
symbols <- asset_returns_tbl %>% distinct(asset) %>% pull()
symbols
## [1] "AAPL" "F" "MU" "NVDA" "WMT"
# weights
weights <- c(0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2)
weights
## [1] 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
w_tbl <- tibble(symbols, weights)
w_tbl
## # A tibble: 5 × 2
## symbols weights
## <chr> <dbl>
## 1 AAPL 0.2
## 2 F 0.2
## 3 MU 0.2
## 4 NVDA 0.2
## 5 WMT 0.2
# ?tq_portfolio
portfolio_returns_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
tq_portfolio(assets_col = asset,
returns_col = returns,
weights = w_tbl,
rebalance_on = "quarters",
col_rename = "returns")
portfolio_returns_tbl
## # A tibble: 60 × 2
## date returns
## <date> <dbl>
## 1 2013-01-31 0.0105
## 2 2013-02-28 0.0243
## 3 2013-03-28 0.0673
## 4 2013-04-30 0.0186
## 5 2013-05-31 0.0781
## 6 2013-06-28 0.00921
## 7 2013-07-31 0.0439
## 8 2013-08-30 0.00627
## 9 2013-09-30 0.0618
## 10 2013-10-31 0.0273
## # ℹ 50 more rows
# Define risk free rate
rfr <- 0.0003
portfolio_SharpeRatio_tbl <- portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
tq_performance(Ra = returns,
performance_fun = SharpeRatio,
Rf = rfr,
FUN = "StdDev")
portfolio_SharpeRatio_tbl
## # A tibble: 1 × 1
## `SharpeRatio(Rf=0%,p=95%)`
## <dbl>
## 1 0.442
portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
# Add a new variable
mutate(excess_returns = if_else(returns > rfr,
"rfr_above",
"rfr_below")) %>%
# Plot
ggplot(aes(x = date, y = returns)) +
geom_point(aes(color = excess_returns)) +
geom_hline(yintercept = rfr, color = "cornflowerblue", linetype = 3, size = 1) +
geom_vline(xintercept = as.Date("2019-02-19"),
color = "cornflowerblue", size = 1, alpha = 0.5) +
theme(legend.position = "none") +
annotate(geom = "text",
x = as.Date("2019-06-19"), y = -0.05,
label = "Covid", size = 5, angle = 90) +
annotate(geom = "text",
x = as.Date("2015-09-01"), y = -0.13,
label = str_glue("More volatile after COVID,
with more of negative returns."),
color = "green") +
labs(y = "monthly returns", x = NULL)
# Create a custom function to calculate rolling SR
Calculate_rolling_SharpeRatio <- function(data) {
rolling_SR <- SharpeRatio(R = data,
Rf = rfr,
FUN = "StdDev")
return(rolling_SR)
}
# Define window
window <- 24
# Transform data: calculate rolling sharpe ratio
rolling_sr_tbl <- portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
tq_mutate(select = returns,
mutate_fun = rollapply,
width = window,
FUN = Calculate_rolling_SharpeRatio,
col_rename = "rolling_sr") %>%
select(-returns) %>%
na.omit()
rolling_sr_tbl
## # A tibble: 37 × 2
## date rolling_sr
## <date> <dbl>
## 1 2014-12-31 0.696
## 2 2015-01-30 0.599
## 3 2015-02-27 0.631
## 4 2015-03-31 0.503
## 5 2015-04-30 0.491
## 6 2015-05-29 0.421
## 7 2015-06-30 0.245
## 8 2015-07-31 0.202
## 9 2015-08-31 0.155
## 10 2015-09-30 0.105
## # ℹ 27 more rows
rolling_sr_tbl %>%
ggplot(aes(x = date, y = rolling_sr)) +
geom_line(color = "cornflowerblue") +
# Labeling
labs(x = NULL,
y = "Rolling Sharpe Ratio") +
annotate(geom = "text",
x = as.Date("2018-03-01"), y = 0.08,
label = "Between 2015 to mid year 2016 this portfolio saw signifigant loss. However, since then the portfolio has made a signifigant bounce back into 2018",
color = "red", size = 2.75)
How has your portfolio performed over time? Provide dates of the structural breaks, if any. The Code Along Assignment 9 had one structural break in November 2016. What do you think the reason is? My portfolio (AAPL, NVDA, F, WMT, and MU) has had some ups and downs over time. The structural break happened in November 2016, which was also found in Code Along Assignment 9. I think this was because of the presidential election and how it affected the market. The election caused changes in investor expectations about the economy, interest rates, and future business policies. These changes may have affected how my stocks performed. Overall, it shows how major events can impact the stock market and cause changes in a portfolio.