# Load packages
# Core
library(tidyverse)
library(tidyquant)
Visualize and examine changes in the underlying trend in the performance of your portfolio in terms of Sharpe Ratio.
Choose your stocks.
from 2012-12-31 to present
symbols <- c ("GS", "NVDA", "JPM", "MS", "BAC")
prices <- tq_get(x = symbols,
get = "stockprices",
from = "2012-12-31",
to = "2017-12-31")
asset_returns_tbl <- prices %>%
group_by(symbol) %>%
tq_transmute(select = adjusted,
mutate_fun = periodReturn,
period = "monthly",
type = "log") %>%
slice(-1) %>%
ungroup() %>%
set_names(c("asset", "date", "returns"))
# symbols
symbols <- asset_returns_tbl %>% distinct(asset) %>% pull()
symbols
## [1] "BAC" "GS" "JPM" "MS" "NVDA"
# weights
weights <- c(0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2)
weights
## [1] 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
w_tbl <- tibble(symbols, weights)
w_tbl
## # A tibble: 5 × 2
## symbols weights
## <chr> <dbl>
## 1 BAC 0.2
## 2 GS 0.2
## 3 JPM 0.2
## 4 MS 0.2
## 5 NVDA 0.2
# ?tq_portfolio
portfolio_returns_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
tq_portfolio(assets_col = asset,
returns_col = returns,
weights = w_tbl,
rebalance_on = "quarters",
col_rename = "returns")
portfolio_returns_tbl
## # A tibble: 60 × 2
## date returns
## <date> <dbl>
## 1 2013-01-31 0.0750
## 2 2013-02-28 0.0147
## 3 2013-03-28 0.00152
## 4 2013-04-30 0.0245
## 5 2013-05-31 0.105
## 6 2013-06-28 -0.0500
## 7 2013-07-31 0.0814
## 8 2013-08-30 -0.0468
## 9 2013-09-30 0.0273
## 10 2013-10-31 0.0150
## # ℹ 50 more rows
# Define risk free rate
rfr <- 0.0003
portfolio_SharpeRatio_tbl <- portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
tq_performance(Ra = returns,
performance_fun = SharpeRatio,
Rf = rfr,
FUN = "StdDev")
portfolio_SharpeRatio_tbl
## # A tibble: 1 × 1
## `SharpeRatio(Rf=0%,p=95%)`
## <dbl>
## 1 0.396
portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
# Add a new variable
mutate(excess_returns = if_else(returns > rfr,
"rfr_above",
"rfr_below")) %>%
# Plot
ggplot(aes(x = date, y = returns)) +
geom_point(aes(color = excess_returns)) +
geom_hline(yintercept = rfr, color = "cornflowerblue", linetype = 3, size = 1) +
geom_vline(xintercept = as.Date("2019-02-19"),
color = "cornflowerblue", size = 1, alpha = 0.5) +
theme(legend.position = "none") +
annotate(geom = "text",
x = as.Date("2019-06-19"), y = -0.05,
label = "Covid", size = 5, angle = 90) +
annotate(geom = "text",
x = as.Date("2015-09-01"), y = -0.13,
label = str_glue("More volatile after COVID,
with more of negative returns."),
color = "green") +
labs(y = "monthly returns", x = NULL)
# Create a custom function to calculate rolling SR
Calculate_rolling_SharpeRatio <- function(data) {
rolling_SR <- SharpeRatio(R = data,
Rf = rfr,
FUN = "StdDev")
return(rolling_SR)
}
# Define window
window <- 24
# Transform data: calculate rolling sharpe ratio
rolling_sr_tbl <- portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
tq_mutate(select = returns,
mutate_fun = rollapply,
width = window,
FUN = Calculate_rolling_SharpeRatio,
col_rename = "rolling_sr") %>%
select(-returns) %>%
na.omit()
rolling_sr_tbl
## # A tibble: 37 × 2
## date rolling_sr
## <date> <dbl>
## 1 2014-12-31 0.517
## 2 2015-01-30 0.264
## 3 2015-02-27 0.315
## 4 2015-03-31 0.294
## 5 2015-04-30 0.310
## 6 2015-05-29 0.267
## 7 2015-06-30 0.323
## 8 2015-07-31 0.270
## 9 2015-08-31 0.269
## 10 2015-09-30 0.212
## # ℹ 27 more rows
rolling_sr_tbl %>%
ggplot(aes(x = date, y = rolling_sr)) +
geom_line(color = "cornflowerblue") +
# Labeling
labs(x = NULL,
y = "Rolling Sharpe Ratio") +
annotate(geom = "text",
x = as.Date("2018-03-01"), y = 0.08,
label = "Between 2015 to mid year 2016 this portfolio saw signifigant loss. However, since then the portfolio has made a signifigant bounce back into 2018",
color = "red", size = 2.75)
How has your portfolio performed over time? Provide dates of the structural breaks, if any. The Code Along Assignment 9 had one structural break in November 2016. What do you think the reason is?
My portfolio’s performance has changed over time, with periods of both strong and weak returns. The overall Sharpe Ratio was 0.396, which shows that the portfolio earned a positive return relative to the amount of risk taken. The rolling Sharpe Ratio was higher at the end of 2014 but decreased during 2015 and early 2016. This suggests the portfolio was not performing as well compared to its risk. Performance improved afterward as the portfolio recovered.
One possible structural break was around November 2016, when the U.S. presidential election caused changes in market expectations. Since my portfolio includes financial stocks like Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America, expectations of higher interest rates and fewer banking regulations could have helped performance.