Meat Inspection Findings at Kiserian Abbatoir, Kajiado County, Kenya

A baseline analysis of digitised ante- and post-mortem inspection records

Author

DR. PURITY KWAMBOKA

Published

November 1, 2026

Abstract

Background. Abattoir meat inspection is both a food-safety control and a passive surveillance system for animal and zoonotic diseases. Kiserian Slaughterhouse in Kajiado County, Kenya, is the pilot site for digitised meat inspection recording on the KABS platform. This analysis establishes a baseline of inspection findings and evaluates the quality of the digital records.

Methods. We analysed all routine ante- and post-mortem inspection records submitted for Kiserian Slaughterhouse from 02 June 2026 to 28 October 2026. Record-level prevalences were estimated with Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CI) and animal-level condemnation rates per 1,000 animals slaughtered with exact Poisson CIs. Negative binomial regression with a log(animals slaughtered) offset estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) for organ condemnation by species and animal source. Kiserian was compared with the national meat inspection dataset (3,365 reports, 141 abattoirs, 17 counties) using species-adjusted negative binomial models and species-standardised condemnation ratios. Data quality was assessed for completeness, internal consistency and reporting continuity.

Results. 269 inspection records covered 19,735 animals presented and 19,558 approved for slaughter (Cattle, Goats, Sheep by record frequency). Whole-carcass condemnation was rare (0.36 (0.14–0.74) per 1,000 slaughtered). Organ condemnation was reported in 50.6% (44.6–56.5) of records. The liver condemnation rate in cattle was 55.4 (47.0–64.9) per 1,000, and was lower in goats (IRR 0.22 (0.15–0.34)) and sheep (IRR 0.20 (0.13–0.31)). Echinococcus (hydatid) cysts were cited in 73.0% (64.5–80.0) of liver condemnations and liver fluke in 59.8% (51.0–68.1). No Cysticercus bovis was detected among 2,797 cattle carcasses. Compared with national data, Kiserian had lower species-adjusted liver (IRR 0.22 (0.17–0.27)) and lung (IRR 0.09 (0.07–0.12)) condemnation rates, but a much higher share of liver condemnations attributed to hydatid cysts (73.0% vs 36.2%). 91.8% of records carried a reporting date, and records were logged on 92 of 149 calendar days.

Conclusions. Whole-carcass condemnation at Kiserian is low, but organ condemnation, driven by hydatid cysts and liver fluke and concentrated in cattle, points to sustained parasite transmission in the source herds. Organ condemnation rates are lower than national levels, but hydatid cysts make up an unusually large share of liver condemnations, which singles Kajiado out for echinococcosis control. The digital system already supports rate estimation. Mandatory reporting dates, count validation and consistent daily logging would make it suitable for trend surveillance.

Keywords: meat inspection; abattoir surveillance; echinococcosis; fascioliasis; organ condemnation; Kenya; digital surveillance

Key messages for decision-makers

  1. Hydatid disease is the leading driver of liver losses. It is cited in 73% of liver condemnations, and in 90% of those in goats. Hydatidosis is a zoonosis maintained by dogs, which calls for a joint veterinary–public health (One Health) response in the source communities.
  2. Cattle carry most of the organ condemnation burden. Cattle livers are condemned at about 4 times the goat rate and lungs at about 12 times, so cattle supply chains should be the priority for parasite control.
  3. Carcass-level food safety risk is low. Whole-carcass condemnation is 0.04% of animals slaughtered, ante-mortem losses are below 0.1%, and no C. bovis has been detected.
  4. Kiserian condemns fewer organs than the national average, but more of them for hydatid cysts. Species-adjusted liver and lung condemnation rates are 78% and 91% lower than nationally, yet hydatid cysts account for 73% of liver condemnations against 36% nationally.
  5. The data system works but has gaps. 8.2% of records are undated, 23 have counts that don’t reconcile, and there was a 20-day gap with no records. Fixing these is low-cost and would turn the system into a reliable trend-surveillance tool.

1 Introduction

Post-mortem inspection at licensed abattoirs is a core control in the farm-to-fork food-safety chain. It is also one of the few sources of systematic, population-level data on the health of slaughtered livestock [1, 2]. Condemnation findings, such as livers rejected for hydatid cysts or fluke, lungs for pneumonia, or whole carcasses for generalised conditions, reflect diseases circulating in the source herds. Several of these are zoonoses of public health importance. In Kenya, meat inspection is governed by the Meat Control Act (Cap. 356) [3], and findings have traditionally been recorded on paper, which limits their timeliness and analytical value.

Kiserian Slaughterhouse, in the peri-urban west of Kajiado County, is the pilot site for digitising meat inspection records on the KABS platform. Each slaughter batch is recorded electronically with its ante-mortem outcomes, carcass and organ condemnations, and the reasons for them.

This report has three objectives:

  1. to assess the completeness, consistency and continuity of the digital inspection records as a surveillance data source;
  2. to describe throughput and ante- and post-mortem inspection findings at Kiserian Slaughterhouse during the pilot period; and
  3. to quantify differences in organ condemnation by species and animal source, and to characterise the aetiology of liver condemnation.

2 Methods

2.1 Study setting

The Kiserian Project digitises meat inspection at two neighbouring slaughter facilities in Keekonyokie Ward, Kajiado West Sub-County, Kajiado County (Figure 1). Both serve the peri-urban market on the south-western edge of Nairobi and draw cattle, sheep and goats mainly from pastoral and agro-pastoral production systems in Kajiado, with occasional consignments from other counties.

  • Kiserian Slaughter House, the programme’s pilot site and the subject of this analysis, contributed 269 inspection records covering 19,735 animals between June 2026 and October 2026. Most records were for cattle (38.7%).
  • Keekonyokie Slaughter House, about 160 m away, records inspections on the same KABS form. It contributed 185 records covering 4,663 animals between May 2026 and October 2026, mostly cattle (49.2% of records).

The two facilities share the same catchment area. The analyses that follow concern Kiserian Slaughter House; Keekonyokie is described here for context.

Figure 1: Study area. (A) Kajiado County, with sub-county boundaries (GADM 4.1) and the location of the two Kiserian Project facilities; the box marks the area shown in panel B. (B) Wards of northern Kajiado around the two facilities, Kiserian (circle) and Keekonyokie (triangle) slaughter houses, which lie under 200 m apart in Keekonyokie Ward (highlighted). Ward boundaries (GADM 4.1) are approximate and the facilities sit close to the ward boundary. County boundaries: geoBoundaries.

2.2 Data source

Inspection data were obtained from the Kiserian Project meat inspection form on the KABS platform. Each record corresponds to one inspection batch of a single species on one day. A batch record captures the number of males and females presented; the numbers dead, rejected, isolated and approved at ante-mortem inspection; the number of whole carcasses condemned; whether organs were condemned, which ones, the number of each and the reasons; partial-condemnation reasons; 17 binary carcass-condition flags; and the county or counties the animals came from. The form was revised during data collection: early submissions have no reporting date or per-organ counts. Both schema versions were harmonised into a single data structure.

2.3 Data processing

Records were restricted to Kiserian Slaughterhouse after free-text facility names had been standardised. Duplicate submissions were removed using the reporting date, facility, location, species and animal counts. Animals presented were defined as the sum of males and females.

2.4 National comparator

For the national comparison, we used the national meat inspection dataset compiled by the Directorate of Veterinary Services covering licensed abattoirs and slaughter slabs across Kenyan counties and was restricted to cattle, sheep and goats. Reports with implausible ante-mortem counts were excluded. Free-text abattoir names were standardised. Variables were harmonised to the Kiserian definitions in Table 1: per-organ counts from the national organ table; liver-condemnation reasons parsed for Echinococcus, fluke and Stilesia hepatica; and the seven carcass conditions recorded on both forms.

2.5 Outcome definitions

Table 1: Outcome definitions and estimators.
Outcome Definition Estimator
Ante-mortem mortality Animals dead on arrival or in lairage, per 1,000 animals presented Rate, exact Poisson 95% CI
Ante-mortem rejection Animals rejected at ante-mortem inspection, per 1,000 animals presented Rate, exact Poisson 95% CI
Whole-carcass condemnation Carcasses condemned in full, per 1,000 animals slaughtered (approved) Rate, exact Poisson 95% CI
Organ condemnation (record level) Share of inspection records reporting at least one condemned organ Proportion, Wilson 95% CI
Organ-specific condemnation Livers / lungs / kidneys condemned per 1,000 animals slaughtered Rate, exact Poisson 95% CI; negative binomial IRR
Liver condemnation aetiology Share of records with a liver condemnation reason that cite each cause Proportion, Wilson 95% CI; Fisher's exact test
Carcass condition prevalence Share of inspection records flagging each condition Proportion, Wilson 95% CI
Female share Female animals as a share of animals presented Proportion, Wilson 95% CI

2.6 Statistical analysis

Proportions are reported with Wilson score 95% CIs [4], and rates per 1,000 animals with exact Poisson CIs. Animals within a batch are not independent, so animal-level CIs are indicative and likely too narrow. The regression models below account for this extra-Poisson variation. Organ condemnation counts per batch were modelled by negative binomial regression [5] with log(animals approved) as an offset. Covariates were species (reference: cattle) and whether the batch included animals from outside Kajiado County; results are reported as IRRs with Wald 95% CIs. Calendar month was tested with a likelihood-ratio test in the subset of dated records. Associations between categorical variables were tested with Fisher’s exact test. Kiserian was compared with the national data using negative binomial models with a log(animals) offset, which gave species-adjusted and species-stratified IRRs. Sensitivity analyses restricted the national data to 2026 and excluded the three highest-volume national abattoirs. Facilities and counties were benchmarked with indirectly species-standardised condemnation ratios: observed counts divided by the counts expected at national species-specific rates, with exact Poisson CIs. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Analyses used R 4.5.0 [6] with the MASS, sf [7] and ggplot2 packages. Administrative boundaries are from geoBoundaries [8] and GADM 4.1 [9].

2.7 Data quality assessment

Data quality was assessed on three dimensions:

  • Completeness: the share of records with each field filled in. Organ-detail fields were assessed only on the records where they apply, i.e. those listing that organ as condemned.
  • Internal consistency: whether animals presented minus animals approved equals the dead, rejected and isolated, and whether approvals exceed animals presented.
  • Continuity: the share of calendar days in the dated period with at least one record, and the longest run of days with no records.

2.8 Ethical considerations

This was a secondary analysis of routinely collected, aggregate animal-health surveillance data. The records contain no personal identifiers of farmers, traders or inspectors.

3 Results

3.1 Data quality and reporting continuity

Of 45 fields, 43 were complete for every record. The exceptions were reporting date (91.7%) and ward (99.3%). Organ-detail fields were complete wherever they applied. Internal consistency was weaker (Table 2). In 23 records (8.6%), the ante-mortem counts did not reconcile, and 6 reported more animals approved than presented. In 6 of the 8 records with any ante-mortem loss, deaths equalled rejections, which suggests that dead animals were also logged as rejected. Records were logged on 92 of 149 days in the dated period (Figure 2). The longest run with no records was 20 days, and no records were logged on a Sunday.

Table 2: Data quality indicators for Kiserian inspection records.
Dimension Indicator Value
Completeness Records with a reporting date 91.8%
Fields complete for every record 43 of 45
Organ-detail fields complete where applicable 100%
Consistency Records with unreconciled ante-mortem counts 23 (8.6%)
Records with approvals exceeding animals presented 6
Loss records with deaths equal to rejections 6 of 8
Continuity Days with at least one record 92 of 149 (61.7%)
Longest run of days with no records 20 days
Figure 2: Daily reporting at Kiserian Slaughterhouse. Each cell is one day, shaded by animals inspected; empty cells are days with no records.

3.2 Throughput and animal characteristics

269 inspection records covered 19,735 animals presented for slaughter (Table 3). Goats contributed the most animals and cattle the most records, which reflects differences in batch size (median 25.5 animals for cattle, against 82 for goats and 100 for sheep). Females made up 37–40% of animals presented across species. Monthly throughput is shown in Figure 3.

Table 3: Characteristics of inspection records by species. Female share with Wilson 95% CI.
Species Records Animals presented Median batch size Approved for slaughter Female share, % (95% CI)
Cattle 104 2,826 25.5 2,797 36.7 (34.9–38.5)
Goats 90 8,994 82.0 9,010 38.0 (37.0–39.0)
Sheep 75 7,915 100.0 7,751 39.7 (38.6–40.8)
All 269 19,735 64 19,558 38.5 (37.8–39.2)
Figure 3: Animals presented for slaughter each month, by species (dated records only).

3.3 Ante-mortem findings

Ante-mortem losses were low across species (Table 4). Overall, 7 animals died before slaughter and 7 were rejected, a mortality rate of 0.35 (0.14–0.73) and a rejection rate of 0.35 (0.14–0.73) per 1,000 animals presented.

Table 4: Ante-mortem inspection outcomes by species. Rates per 1,000 animals presented with exact Poisson 95% CI.
Species Presented Dead Rejected Isolated Mortality per 1,000 Rejection per 1,000 Isolation per 1,000
Cattle 2,826 2 2 0 0.71 (0.09–2.56) 0.71 (0.09–2.56) 0.00 (0.00–1.31)
Goats 8,994 2 3 0 0.22 (0.03–0.80) 0.33 (0.07–0.97) 0.00 (0.00–0.41)
Sheep 7,915 3 2 6 0.38 (0.08–1.11) 0.25 (0.03–0.91) 0.76 (0.28–1.65)
All 19,735 7 7 6 0.35 (0.14–0.73) 0.35 (0.14–0.73) 0.30 (0.11–0.66)

3.4 Post-mortem findings

3.4.1 Whole-carcass condemnation

7 carcasses were condemned in full, a rate of 0.36 (0.14–0.74) per 1,000 animals slaughtered (Table 5). Monthly rates and their 95% CIs overlapped throughout the study period (Figure 4).

Table 5: Post-mortem inspection outcomes by species. Rates per 1,000 animals slaughtered (exact Poisson 95% CI); organ condemnation as share of records (Wilson 95% CI).
Species Slaughtered Carcasses condemned per 1,000 Records with organ condemnation, % Livers per 1,000 Lungs per 1,000 Kidneys per 1,000
Cattle 2,797 0.36 (0.01–1.99) 75.0 (65.9–82.3) 55.4 (47.0–64.9) 28.2 (22.4–35.2) 2.5 (1.0–5.2)
Goats 9,010 0.22 (0.03–0.80) 35.6 (26.4–45.8) 13.3 (11.0–15.9) 2.6 (1.6–3.8) 0.8 (0.3–1.6)
Sheep 7,751 0.52 (0.14–1.32) 34.7 (24.9–45.9) 11.2 (9.0–13.8) 2.3 (1.4–3.7) 0.3 (0.0–0.9)
All 19,558 0.36 (0.14–0.74) 50.6 (44.6–56.5) 18.5 (16.7–20.5) 6.1 (5.1–7.3) 0.8 (0.5–1.3)
Figure 4: Monthly whole-carcass condemnation rate per 100 animals slaughtered, with 95% Wilson CIs. A partial final month is excluded.

3.4.2 Organ condemnation

At least one condemned organ was reported in 50.6% (44.6–56.5) of records. Livers and lungs dominated: 18.5 (16.7–20.5) livers and 6.1 (5.1–7.3) lungs were condemned per 1,000 animals slaughtered. Organ condemnation rates were markedly higher in cattle than in small ruminants (Figure 5). After adjustment, the liver condemnation rate was 78% lower in goats and 80% lower in sheep than in cattle, and the lung rate around 92% lower in both (Table 6, Figure 6). Batches containing animals from outside Kajiado (n = 12) did not differ significantly in liver (p = 0.982) or lung (p = 0.430) condemnation rates, although the estimates are imprecise. Calendar month was not associated with liver (likelihood-ratio p = 0.153) or lung (p = 0.068) condemnation.

Figure 5: Organ condemnation rates per 1,000 animals slaughtered by species, with exact Poisson 95% CIs.
Table 6: Negative binomial regression of organ condemnation counts per inspection batch, offset by log(animals slaughtered). IRR = incidence rate ratio.
Outcome Covariate IRR (95% CI) p-value Dispersion (θ)
Liver condemnation Goats (vs cattle) 0.22 (0.15–0.34) <0.001 0.76
Sheep (vs cattle) 0.20 (0.13–0.31) <0.001 0.76
Animals from outside Kajiado 1.01 (0.45–2.28) 0.982 0.76
Lung condemnation Goats (vs cattle) 0.09 (0.04–0.19) <0.001 0.21
Sheep (vs cattle) 0.08 (0.04–0.19) <0.001 0.21
Animals from outside Kajiado 0.55 (0.12–2.44) 0.430 0.21
Figure 6: Incidence rate ratios for liver and lung condemnation from negative binomial models (log scale, reference: cattle sourced only from Kajiado).

3.4.3 Aetiology of liver condemnation

Of the 122 records giving a reason for liver condemnation, 73.0% (64.5–80.0) cited Echinococcus (hydatid) cysts and 59.8% (51.0–68.1) liver fluke. 40 records (32.8%) cited both. The share citing hydatid cysts differed by species, from 63% in cattle to 90% in goats (Fisher’s exact p = 0.013). The share citing fluke did not differ significantly by species (p = 0.176) (Figure 7).

Figure 7: Share of liver-condemnation records citing hydatid cysts and liver fluke, by species, with Wilson 95% CIs. A record can cite both.

3.4.4 Carcass conditions and partial condemnation

6 of the 17 carcass conditions were recorded at least once (Figure 8). Bruising was the most frequent (7.4% (4.9–11.2) of records); it is a welfare indicator of handling during loading, transport and lairage. Never recorded: Abnormal pigmentation, Arthritis, Ascites, C. bovis, Folliculitis, Myotic disease, Overscalding, Peritonitis, Septic peritonitis, Septic pleurisy, Septicaemia. Partial carcass condemnation was reported in 5.2% of records, most often for fractures (Table 7).

Figure 8: Prevalence of carcass conditions recorded at least once, as share of inspection records, with Wilson 95% CIs.
Table 7: Reasons recorded for partial carcass condemnation.
Reason Records Species
Fractures 8 Cattle, Goats, Sheep
Multiple abscesses 2 Cattle
Unspecified (recorded as 'Yes') 2 Goats, Sheep
Contamination 1 Goats
Septic pleurisy 1 Cattle

3.4.5 Cysticercus bovis

No C. bovis was detected in any of the 269 inspection records, which cover 2,797 cattle carcasses. The upper 95% confidence limit for prevalence among cattle carcasses, if all were inspected, is 0.13%.

3.5 Animal sources

All records listed Kajiado County as a source of animals. 12 records (4.5%) also included animals from other counties (Table 8). Organ condemnation was reported in 10 of these 12 records (Fisher’s exact p = 0.035); given the small number of records, this association should be confirmed as more data accrue.

Table 8: Counties listed as a source of animals. A record can list more than one county.
County Records Share of records
Kajiado 269 100.0%
Taita Taveta 6 2.2%
Garissa 3 1.1%
Narok 2 0.7%
Machakos 1 0.4%

3.6 Comparison with national meat inspection data

3.6.1 Comparator dataset

The national comparator comprised 3,365 cattle, sheep and goat reports from 141 abattoirs in 17 counties, reported between August 2024 and August 2026. They covered 1,655,263 animals presented and 1,578,181 slaughtered (Table 9). Kajiado County is not represented in the national dataset, so the comparison is effectively Kiserian against the rest of the reporting counties. National throughput is highly concentrated: the three highest-volume abattoirs account for 75.9% of animals slaughtered. Pooled national rates are therefore dominated by large commercial facilities. The facility- and county-level standardised analyses below address this.

Table 9: Kiserian and national comparator datasets (cattle, sheep and goats).
Dataset Reports Abattoirs Counties Period Animals slaughtered Species mix (cattle / goats / sheep, % of slaughtered)
Kiserian 269 1 1 Jun 2026 – Oct 2026 19,558 14% / 46% / 40%
National 3,365 141 17 Aug 2024 – Aug 2026 1,578,181 4% / 78% / 18%

3.6.2 Ante- and post-mortem rates

Table 10 compares crude rates by species. After adjustment for species mix, Kiserian’s liver condemnation rate was 78% lower than the national rate (IRR 0.22 (0.17–0.27), p <0.001). Its lung condemnation rate was 91% lower (IRR 0.09 (0.07–0.12)) (Figure 9). The gap was largest in cattle (liver IRR 0.22 (0.17–0.28)) and sheep (liver IRR 0.13 (0.08–0.20)). For goats, the liver condemnation rate was lower at Kiserian (IRR 0.28 (0.19–0.44)). Whole-carcass condemnation (IRR 1.44 (0.64–3.23)) and ante-mortem rejection (IRR 1.17 (0.45–3.04)) were not significantly different from national levels. Ante-mortem mortality was lower (IRR 0.14 (0.06–0.35)).

Table 10: Inspection outcomes at Kiserian and nationally, by species. Rates per 1,000 animals (exact Poisson 95% CI): mortality per 1,000 presented; condemnation per 1,000 slaughtered. Organ condemnation as share of records (Wilson 95% CI).
Species Source Records Mortality Carcasses condemned Livers Lungs Records with organ condemnation, %
Cattle National 1,122 0.78 (0.57–1.04) 0.55 (0.38–0.77) 259.4 (255.3–263.5) 192.6 (189.1–196.2) 76.0 (73.4–78.4)
Kiserian 104 0.71 (0.09–2.56) 0.36 (0.01–1.99) 55.4 (47.0–64.9) 28.2 (22.4–35.2) 75.0 (65.9–82.3)
Goats National 1,283 8.7 (8.6–8.9) 0.09 (0.08–0.11) 9.7 (9.6–9.9) 7.1 (7.0–7.3) 74.2 (71.7–76.5)
Kiserian 90 0.22 (0.03–0.80) 0.22 (0.03–0.80) 13.3 (11.0–15.9) 2.6 (1.6–3.8) 35.6 (26.4–45.8)
Sheep National 960 1.3 (1.2–1.4) 0.25 (0.20–0.32) 43.4 (42.7–44.2) 33.4 (32.7–34.1) 65.2 (62.1–68.2)
Kiserian 75 0.38 (0.08–1.11) 0.52 (0.14–1.32) 11.2 (9.0–13.8) 2.3 (1.4–3.7) 34.7 (24.9–45.9)
Figure 9: Incidence rate ratios (Kiserian vs national) from negative binomial models with a log(animals) offset. ‘All species’ estimates are adjusted for species; species-specific estimates are stratified. Values below 1 indicate a lower rate at Kiserian.

The lower organ condemnation rates at Kiserian were robust to restricting the national data to 2026 and to excluding the three highest-volume national abattoirs (Table 11).

Table 11: Sensitivity of the species-adjusted Kiserian vs national IRRs for organ condemnation.
Analysis Outcome IRR (95% CI) p-value
Main analysis (all national reports) Liver condemnation 0.22 (0.17–0.27) <0.001
Lung condemnation 0.09 (0.07–0.12) <0.001
National reports from 2026 only Liver condemnation 0.20 (0.16–0.26) <0.001
Lung condemnation 0.08 (0.06–0.11) <0.001
Excluding the three highest-volume national abattoirs Liver condemnation 0.14 (0.12–0.17) <0.001
Lung condemnation 0.06 (0.05–0.08) <0.001

3.6.3 Facility benchmarking

Pooled national rates mix very different facilities, so each abattoir with at least five reports was benchmarked with an indirectly species-standardised liver condemnation ratio (SCR). The SCR is the observed number of condemned livers divided by the number expected at national species-specific rates. Kiserian’s SCR was 0.31 (0.28–0.35), lower than 83% of the 48 national abattoirs benchmarked (Figure 10). Facility SCRs varied about 310-fold, which points to genuine differences in disease burden between catchments, differences in inspection and recording practice, or both.

Figure 10: Species-standardised liver condemnation ratio (observed / expected at national species-specific rates) for each abattoir with five or more reports, with exact Poisson 95% CIs. Kiserian is highlighted; 1 = national level.

3.6.4 Spatial comparison

Figure 11: County-level comparison. (A) Species-standardised liver condemnation ratio by county (counties with 20 or more national reports); Kajiado shows Kiserian. (B) Share of liver-condemnation records citing hydatid cysts (counties with 10 or more such records). Grey counties have no or insufficient data.

County-level standardised liver condemnation ratios varied widely (Figure 11 A). Kajiado, represented by Kiserian, sits below the national level (SCR 0.31). The share of liver condemnations attributed to hydatid cysts at Kiserian is higher than in every reporting county with enough data (Figure 11 B).

3.6.5 Aetiology of liver condemnation

Hydatid cysts were cited in 73.0% (64.5–80.0) of liver condemnations at Kiserian, against 36.2% (34.2–38.4) nationally (Fisher’s exact p <0.001). Liver fluke shares were 59.8% and 62.8% respectively (p 0.502). Nationally, the tapeworm Stilesia hepatica was cited in 44.0% (41.8–46.2) of liver condemnations. The Kiserian form offers no Stilesia option, so that cause cannot be measured there (Table 12).

Table 12: Causes cited in liver-condemnation records, Kiserian vs national (Wilson 95% CI). Hydatid comparison by species with Fisher’s exact test.
Group Cause Kiserian National p-value
All species Echinococcus (hydatid) cysts 73.0 (64.5–80.0) 36.2 (34.2–38.4) <0.001
Liver fluke 59.8 (51.0–68.1) 62.8 (60.7–64.9) 0.502
Stilesia hepatica Not on form 44.0 (41.8–46.2) –
Cattle Echinococcus (hydatid) cysts 62.7 (50.7–73.3) 69.1 (65.8–72.3) 0.275
Goats Echinococcus (hydatid) cysts 90.0 (74.4–96.5) 0.0 (0.0–0.5) <0.001
Sheep Echinococcus (hydatid) cysts 80.0 (60.9–91.1) 40.8 (36.6–45.1) <0.001

3.6.6 Carcass conditions

Of the seven conditions recorded on both forms, 3 were significantly less frequent at Kiserian and 0 significantly more frequent (Figure 12). Notably, septic pleurisy, multiple abscesses, C. bovis (flagged in 6–11% of national reports) were rare or absent at Kiserian.

Figure 12: Prevalence of carcass conditions recorded on both forms, as share of inspection records (Wilson 95% CI): Kiserian (blue) and national (grey). Fisher’s exact p-values on the right.

3.6.7 Animal profile

Figure 13: Female share of animals presented for slaughter by species, Kiserian vs national (national: records reporting female counts), with Wilson 95% CIs.

Females made up 38–40% of the goats and sheep slaughtered at Kiserian, against 9–13% nationally; for cattle the shares were 37% and 35% (Figure 13). Nationally, pregnant females accounted for 0.67% (0.66–0.68) of animals presented and appeared in 33.3% of reports. The Kiserian form does not record pregnancy.

3.6.8 Data quality

Table 13 compares data-quality indicators. Female counts are reported in every Kiserian record, against 71.3% of national records. 8.6% of Kiserian records have unreconciled ante-mortem counts, against 10.4% nationally. Kiserian, however, lacks two fields the national form captures: pregnancy status and Stilesia hepatica as a liver-condemnation reason.

Table 13: Data quality indicators, Kiserian vs national.
Indicator Kiserian National
Records with a reporting date 91.8% 100.0%
Records reporting female counts 100.0% 71.3%
Records with unreconciled ante-mortem counts 8.6% 10.4%
Reports excluded for implausible counts 0 235 (6.5%)
Pregnancy status captured No Yes
Stilesia hepatica available as liver reason No Yes

4 Discussion

4.1 Principal findings

This baseline analysis of digitised meat inspection records from Kiserian Slaughterhouse yields three main findings.

  1. Carcass-level risk is low. Whole-carcass condemnation and ante-mortem losses were both rare, and no C. bovis was detected.
  2. Organ condemnation is common and species-dependent. At least one organ was condemned in 51% of inspection records, with liver and lung condemnation several-fold higher in cattle than in goats and sheep.
  3. Two parasites dominate liver condemnation. Hydatid cysts and liver fluke account for most liver condemnations, and hydatid cysts make up the largest share in goats.

4.2 Comparison with national data

Against the national dataset, Kiserian condemns markedly fewer livers and lungs per animal slaughtered, after adjustment for species and in species-standardised facility and county comparisons. The finding held when the national data were restricted to 2026 and when the largest national abattoirs were excluded. There are two plausible explanations, and they are not mutually exclusive:

  • a genuinely lower burden of lung and liver disease in Kajiado’s supply herds;
  • differences in recording practice between facilities.

The very large spread of standardised ratios across national abattoirs suggests that recording practice contributes substantially, which argues for harmonised inspection protocols. By contrast, the share of liver condemnations attributed to hydatid cysts at Kiserian is roughly double the national share. Even if Kiserian’s overall condemnation rates are conservative, the echinococcosis signal from Kajiado is strong.

4.3 Performance of the digital recording system

The digital system recorded the core ante- and post-mortem variables reliably: 43 of the 45 form fields were filled in for every record, and the only incomplete fields were reporting date (91.7%) and ward (99.3%). Per-organ counts and reasons were fully recorded wherever they applied, so organ-specific rates and aetiologies can be estimated. Its weaknesses are procedural rather than technical:

  • Undated records: 8.2% of records have no reporting date, all from before the date field was introduced.
  • Unreconciled counts: 23 records have ante-mortem counts that don’t add up.
  • Possible double-counting: dead animals appear to be logged as rejected as well.
  • Reporting gaps: there was a 20-day gap with no records, and no Sunday reporting.

These gaps limit trend analysis more than they limit the estimation of rates.

4.4 Strengths and limitations

Strengths. The data are complete for the core variables, and per-organ counts are recorded at batch level. The analysis covers all digitised records from the pilot period, uses exact and score-based interval estimation, and models overdispersion explicitly.

Limitations.

  • Record-level data: individual animals cannot be linked to findings, so animal-level CIs ignore clustering within batches.
  • Possible reporting bias: findings depend on inspector recording practice and may be under-reported on days with high throughput.
  • Limited spatial analysis: almost all animals were sourced from Kajiado, so disease patterns could not be compared between source areas, and the multi-county field doesn’t attribute animals within a batch.
  • External validity: this is a single-facility study.
  • National comparison: the national dataset covers a longer period (August 2024 to August 2026), uses a different form version, does not include Kajiado, and is dominated by a few large facilities. Rates were therefore compared with species adjustment, standardisation and sensitivity analyses, but residual differences in inspection practice cannot be excluded.

5 Conclusion

Whole-carcass condemnation and ante-mortem losses at Kiserian Slaughterhouse are low, and no C. bovis has been detected. Organ condemnation is the main finding of public health and economic importance. It is driven by hydatid cysts and liver fluke and concentrated in cattle. The digitised inspection records already support robust rate estimation and should be used routinely to guide One Health interventions in the source herds. A few low-cost improvements to data capture would make them suitable for trend surveillance: mandatory dates, count validation, consistent daily logging and a pregnancy field.

Data availability

Inspection records are held on the KABS platform (Directorate of Veterinary Services). The analysis is fully reproducible from the accompanying R and Quarto source, which pulls the records directly from the platform.

References

  1. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Code of Hygienic Practice for Meat (CAC/RCP 58-2005). Rome: FAO/WHO; 2005.
  2. World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Paris: WOAH.
  3. Republic of Kenya. Meat Control Act, Cap. 356, Laws of Kenya.
  4. Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1927;22(158):209–212.
  5. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
  6. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  7. Pebesma E. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal. 2018;10(1):439–446.
  8. Runfola D, et al. geoBoundaries: a global database of political administrative boundaries. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231866.
  9. GADM. Database of Global Administrative Areas, version 4.1.