# install any packages you have not previously used, then comment them back out.
#install.packages("car")
#install.packages("effsize")
library(psych) # for the describe() command
## Warning: package 'psych' was built under R version 4.5.2
library(car) # for the leveneTest() command
## Warning: package 'car' was built under R version 4.5.2
## Loading required package: carData
## Warning: package 'carData' was built under R version 4.5.2
##
## Attaching package: 'car'
## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## logit
library(effsize) # for the cohen.d() command
##
## Attaching package: 'effsize'
## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## cohen.d
d <- read.csv(file="Data/projectdata.csv", header=T)
# For the HW, you will import the project dataset you cleaned previously
# This will be the dataset you'll use for HWs throughout the rest of the semester
We predict that there will be a significant difference in Independence by people’s level of Age between [between ages 18 and 25] and [between ages 26 and 35]
[Remember to revise the above hypothesis in you HW assignment. Then delete line 45 and this reminder.]
# you **only** need to check the variables you're using in the current analysis
## Checking the Categorical variable (IV)
str(d)
## 'data.frame': 2092 obs. of 7 variables:
## $ ResponseID : chr "R_BJN3bQqi1zUMid3" "R_2TGbiBXmAtxywsD" "R_12G7bIqN2wB2N65" "R_39pldNoon8CePfP" ...
## $ age : chr "1 between 18 and 25" "1 between 18 and 25" "1 between 18 and 25" "1 between 18 and 25" ...
## $ income : chr "1 low" "1 low" "rather not say" "rather not say" ...
## $ swb : num 4.33 4.17 1.83 5.17 3.67 ...
## $ stress : num 3.3 3.3 4 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.3 2.4 2.9 2.7 ...
## $ exploit : num 2 3.67 4.33 1.67 4 ...
## $ moa_independence: num 3.67 3.67 3.5 3 3.83 ...
# if the categorical variable you're using is showing as a "chr" (character), you must change it to be a ** factor ** -- using the next line of code (as.factor)
d$age <- as.factor(d$age)
str(d)
## 'data.frame': 2092 obs. of 7 variables:
## $ ResponseID : chr "R_BJN3bQqi1zUMid3" "R_2TGbiBXmAtxywsD" "R_12G7bIqN2wB2N65" "R_39pldNoon8CePfP" ...
## $ age : Factor w/ 4 levels "1 between 18 and 25",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ income : chr "1 low" "1 low" "rather not say" "rather not say" ...
## $ swb : num 4.33 4.17 1.83 5.17 3.67 ...
## $ stress : num 3.3 3.3 4 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.3 2.4 2.9 2.7 ...
## $ exploit : num 2 3.67 4.33 1.67 4 ...
## $ moa_independence: num 3.67 3.67 3.5 3 3.83 ...
table(d$age, useNA = "always")
##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 4 over 45
## 1928 110 37 17
## <NA>
## 0
## Checking the Continuous variable (DV)
# you can use the describe() command on an entire dataframe (d) or just on a single variable within your dataframe -- which we will do here
describe(d$moa_independence)
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 2092 3.54 0.47 3.67 3.61 0.49 1 4 3 -1.5 2.76 0.01
# also use a histogram to visualize your continuous variable
hist(d$moa_independence)
# use the describeBy() command to view the means and standard deviations by group
# it's very similar to the describe() command but splits the dataframe according to the 'group' variable
describeBy(d$moa_independence, group=d$age)
##
## Descriptive statistics by group
## group: 1 between 18 and 25
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 1928 3.53 0.47 3.67 3.61 0.49 1 4 3 -1.49 2.73 0.01
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: 2 between 26 and 35
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 110 3.6 0.46 3.67 3.68 0.49 1.83 4 2.17 -1.55 2.27 0.04
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: 3 between 36 and 45
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 37 3.66 0.3 3.67 3.68 0.49 3 4 1 -0.59 -0.82 0.05
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: 4 over 45
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 17 3.64 0.34 3.67 3.66 0.49 3 4 1 -0.4 -1.36 0.08
# lastly, use a boxplot to examine your chosen continuous and categorical variables together
boxplot(d$moa_independence~d$age)
# If the IV has more than 2 levels, you must DROP any additional levels in order to meet the first assumption of a t-test.
## NOTE: This is a FOUR STEP process!
d <- subset(d, age != "4 over 45") # use subset() to remove all participants from the additional level
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now there are ZERO participants in the additional level
##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 4 over 45
## 1928 110 37 0
## <NA>
## 0
d$age <- droplevels(d$age) # use droplevels() to drop the empty factor
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now the entire factor level is removed
##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 <NA>
## 1928 110 37 0
## Repeat ALL THE STEPS ABOVE if your IV has more levels that need to be DROPPED. Copy the 4 lines of code, and replace the level name in the subset() command.
d <- subset(d, age != "3 between 36 and 45") # use subset() to remove all participants from the additional level
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now there are ZERO participants in the additional level
##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 3 between 36 and 45 <NA>
## 1928 110 0 0
d$age <- droplevels(d$age) # use droplevels() to drop the empty factor
table(d$age, useNA = "always") # verify that now the entire factor level is removed
##
## 1 between 18 and 25 2 between 26 and 35 <NA>
## 1928 110 0
## Repeat ALL THE STEPS ABOVE if your IV has more levels that need to be DROPPED. Copy the 4 lines of code, and replace the level name in the subset() command
We can test whether the variances of our two groups are equal using Levene’s test. The NULL hypothesis is that the variance between the two groups is equal, which is the result we WANT. So when running Levene’s test we’re hoping for a NON-SIGNIFICANT result!
# use the leveneTest() command from the car package to test homogeneity of variance
# it uses the same 'formula' setup that we'll use for our t-test: formula is y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV
leveneTest(moa_independence~age, data =d)
## Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = median)
## Df F value Pr(>F)
## group 1 0.1174 0.732
## 2036
Levene’s test revealed that our data has a non significant difference variances between the two comparison groups, between 18 and 25 and between 26 and 25, on their levels of Independence.
[Revise the above statement for you HW assignment. Then delete this reminder.]
When running a t-test, we can account for heterogeneity in our variance by using the Welch’s t-test, which does not have the same assumption about variance as the Student’s t-test (the general default type of t-test in statistics). R defaults to using Welch’s t-test so this doesn’t require any changes on our part! Even if your data has no issues with homogeneity of variance, you’ll still use Welch’s t-test – it handles the potential issues around variance well and there are no real downsides. We’re using Levene’s test here to get into the habit of checking the homogeneity of our variance, even if we already have the solution for any potential problems.
My independent variable has more than two levels To proceed with this analysis, I will drop the between 36 and 34 and 4 over 45 participants from my sample. I will make a note to discuss this issue in my Methods section write-up and in my Discussion section as a limitation of my study.
My data also has does not have a issue regarding homogeneity of variance, as Levene’s test was non significant. I will use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test in my analysis.
My continuous variable moa_independence did not pass the kurtosis test as there it more than +2 the value was 2.76
[Revise the above statements for you HW assignment. Then delete this reminder.]
# Very simple! we use the same formula of y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV
t_output <- t.test(d$moa_independence~d$age) # t_output will now show in your Global Environment
t_output
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: d$moa_independence by d$age
## t = -1.3929, df = 122.17, p-value = 0.1662
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group 1 between 18 and 25 and group 2 between 26 and 35 is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.15315529 0.02664328
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 between 18 and 25 mean in group 2 between 26 and 35
## 3.533714 3.596970
# once again, we use the same formula, y~x, to calculate cohen's d
# We **only** calculate effect size if the test is SIG!
# d_output <- cohen.d(d$moa_independence~d$age) # d_output will now show in your Global Environment
# d_output
## Remember to always take the ABSOLAUTE VALUE of the effect size value (i.e., it will never be negative)
To test our hypothesis that there would be significant difference between group 1 between 18 and 25 mean and group 2 between 26 and 35 age groups in the levels of Independence, we used an independent samples t-test. This required us to drop our 3 between 36 and 45 and 4 over 45 age participants from our sample, as we are limited to a two-group comparison when using this test. We tested the homogeneity of variance with Levene’s test and found no signs of heterogeneity (p = 0.732 ). This suggests that we have homogeneity. We used Welch’s t-test, which does not assume homogeneity of variance. Our data met all other assumptions of an independent samples t-test.
We do not reject our null as we did not get significant results and we found that group 1 between 18 and 25 (M = 3.53, SD = 0.47) and group 2 between 26 and 35 (M = 3.59, SD = 0.30); t(122.17) = -1.39, p = 0.166 (see Figure 1).
[Revise the above statements for you HW assignment.]
References
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.