Load data.
## Source: local data frame [4 x 3]
## Groups: training_condition [?]
##
## training_condition experiment n()
## (chr) (chr) (int)
## 1 active_active positive_rh_passive 50
## 2 active_active random_passive 48
## 3 passive_passive positive_rh_passive 50
## 4 passive_passive random_passive 45
## Source: local data frame [4 x 4]
## Groups: training_condition [?]
##
## training_condition experiment m_train_time m_exp_time
## (chr) (chr) (dbl) (dbl)
## 1 active_active positive_rh_passive 0.6306516 4.383012
## 2 active_active random_passive 0.6530123 4.719400
## 3 passive_passive positive_rh_passive 0.5764330 4.403786
## 4 passive_passive random_passive 0.6121737 4.380315
Remove: - Participants who were scored perfect on the pretest - Participants who’s difference scores were 3 SD away from the mean difference score
Plot
Does your pretest rhombus knowledge predict how you will do at test? Do we see condition differences based on pretest rhombus knowledge
Munge training data, so we can score them.
Score the training data for each participant