Why I picked this

I climb, so I wanted to know if finger endurance actually lines up with harder climbing grades.

I’m comparing critical force (CF) and W-prime (W’) for both sport climbing and bouldering.

The data

  • The dataset comes from Giles et al.’s climber testing research.
  • It has 121 climbers, including 80 sport grades and 72 bouldering grades.
  • Grades use the IRCRA scale, so they’re not directly V-grades or Yosemite grades.

Math 1: What are CF and W’?

CF: how much force a climber can keep producing as the finger muscles fatigue.

\[CF_{relative} = \frac{CF\ (kg)}{body\ mass\ (kg)}\times100\]

W’: the extra force-time impulse available above critical force during the test.

\[W'_{relative} = \frac{W'}{body\ mass}\]

Both measures are adjusted for body mass so climbers are easier to compare.

Math 2: How do I compare them?

I used correlation to measure how strongly two things are related.

\[r = \frac{\sum(x_i-\bar{x})(y_i-\bar{y})}{\sqrt{\sum(x_i-\bar{x})^2\sum(y_i-\bar{y})^2}}\]

I also used a simple regression line:

\[\hat{y} = b_0 + b_1x\]

A bigger positive \(r\) means a stronger positive linear relationship. It doesn’t prove cause and effect.

A bit of the R code

cor(sport$cf, sport$sport)
cor(boulder$wp, boulder$boulder)

sport_fit <- lm(sport ~ cf, data=sport)
summary(sport_fit)

I used these to check the correlations and fit a line through the data.

Does CF matter for sport climbing?

There is a clear positive trend (r = 0.78). Higher CF generally goes with harder sport grades.

Does W’ matter for bouldering?

W’ also has a positive relationship with bouldering grade (r = 0.57).

Comparing the results

Climbing type CF correlation W’ correlation
Sport 0.78 0.22
Bouldering 0.48 0.57

CF has the stronger relationship with sport climbing. W’ has the stronger relationship with bouldering in this sample.

Interactive graph

Hover over the points to compare each climber’s CF, W’, and sport grade. Color shows W’.

What I learned

  • Finger performance is related to climbing grade, but different measures matter more for different disciplines.
  • Sport climbing: CF was the stronger measure in this dataset.
  • Bouldering: W’ had a stronger correlation than CF.
  • That’s a relationship, not proof that training one number will improve grades.

What this doesn’t tell us

These are self-reported climbing grades from an observational dataset.

Technique, experience, body position, and training history also affect climbing. The graphs only look at one finger measurement at a time.

Sources