This is an R Markdown document. Markdown is a simple formatting syntax for authoring HTML, PDF, and MS Word documents. For more details on using R Markdown see http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com.
When you click the Knit button a document will be generated that includes both content as well as the output of any embedded R code chunks within the document. You can embed an R code chunk like this:
library(igraph)
##
## Attaching package: 'igraph'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## decompose, spectrum
## The following object is masked from 'package:base':
##
## union
g5 <- graph_from_literal(Joelyne-Father-Mother-Grandma, Joelyne-Tristan:Franchesca, Joelyne-Mariah, Mariah-Tristan, Joelyne-Anthony-Francisco, Joelyne-Francisco)
plot(g5)
A fitness-apparel brand is launching a new product and can give free samples to only two people. The network below shows who influences whom on social media. Use network metrics to decide who should receive the samples.
library(igraph)
library(dplyr)
##
## Attaching package: 'dplyr'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:igraph':
##
## as_data_frame, groups, union
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## filter, lag
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
##
## intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
# A social media network around a brand
g_mkt <- graph_from_literal(
Brand-Ava-Ben-Cara, # chain of connections
Brand-Cara,
Ava-Dan:Eli:Fay, # Ava is connected to Dan, Eli, and Fay
Ben-Gus,
Cara-Hal:Ivy,
Dan-Eli,
Fay-Gus,
Hal-Ivy-Jon,
Brand-Kim-Jon
)
set.seed(123) # fixes the layout so the plot looks the same each time
plot(g_mkt, vertex.color = "lightblue", vertex.label.color = "black")
Look at the plot above. Who looks most “central” visually? Identify any cliques (tightly connected groups).
Your answer: Visually, the individuals who looks the most “central,” I would say is Brand and Ben. Identifying any cliques, I see that Cara, Ivy, and Hal are tightly connected. As well as Ava, Dan, and Eli.
Compute degree, closeness, and betweenness, then put the results in one data frame and rank the nodes.
centrality_df <- data.frame(
person = V(g_mkt)$name,
degree = degree(g_mkt),
closeness = round(closeness(g_mkt), 3),
betweenness = round(betweenness(g_mkt), 2)
)
centrality_df %>% arrange(desc(betweenness))
## person degree closeness betweenness
## Ava Ava 5 0.050 25.83
## Cara Cara 4 0.048 18.17
## Brand Brand 3 0.050 17.00
## Ben Ben 3 0.048 13.33
## Kim Kim 2 0.037 5.00
## Ivy Ivy 3 0.037 4.50
## Fay Fay 2 0.036 2.17
## Gus Gus 2 0.034 1.50
## Jon Jon 2 0.033 1.50
## Dan Dan 2 0.034 0.00
## Eli Eli 2 0.034 0.00
## Hal Hal 2 0.034 0.00
Your answer: Which people rank highest on each measure? For degree, Ava ranked the highest with 5. For closeness, Ava and Brand ranked the highest with both being 0.5. Ranking betweenness, Ava ranked the highest with 25.83. Do the rankings agree? I would say that the rankings do agree with the results as Ava had the overall highest measurement.
Which two people should receive free samples? Justify your choice using at least two different metrics. (Hint: is high degree the same as being a bridge?) Your answer: I would say that the two people who should receive a free sample should be Ava and Brand. While Cara did have a high measurement, Brand had an overall higher closeness. Since Ava had a high degree, closeness, and betweenness, she would be the perfect bridge to share the new product with her connections.
https://visiblenetworklabs.com/2021/04/16/understanding-network-centrality/Links to an external site.
https://cambridge-intelligence.com/learn/social-network-analysis/Links to an external site.