Introduction
This project examined the determinants influencing investment scam
losses in Australia.
- Scam losses: Numeric (AUD)
- Sample size: 2,407
- Year: 2023
Seven Determinants Examined:
- Number of reports the Scam Watch Centre received
(numeric)
- Cash rate in the economy (numeric)
- Unemployment rate in the economy (numeric)
- Victims’ gender (factor = 2)
- Age group (factor = 7)
- Jurisdiction / State (factor = 9)
- Contact methods used by scammers (factor = 4)
Dashboard Analytics
Scamloss(DV) Australia map
Scamloss(DV) mean monthly
Scamloss(DV) value by month
ResidualsDeviance vs Fitted
Scamloss(DV) outliers by month
GLM results table
GLM gamma coefficients logscale
GLM gamma coefficients exponentialscale
Scamloss(DV) NoReports(IV)
Scamloss(DV) CashRate(IV)
Scamloss(DV) Unemplytrate(IV)
AverageScamloss(DV) Gender(IV)
AverageScamloss(DV) Agegroup(IV)
AverageScamloss(DV) State(IV)
Posthoc Tukey Contactmethod(IV)
Posthoc Tukey Agegroup(IV)
Estimated Scamloss(DV) Cashrate(IV) State(M)
Estimated Scamloss(DV) Cashrate(IV) Age(M)
Estimated Scamloss(DV) Cashrate(IV) Gender(M)
Conclusion
Statistical Association with Scam Losses:
- Number of reports: Positive association
- Cash rate in the economy: Negative association
- Age group (factor = 7): Positive association
- Jurisdiction / State (factor = 9): Positive
association
- Unemployment rate: Nil association
- Victims’ gender (factor = 2): Nil association
- Contact methods used by scammers (factor = 4): Nil
association
Recommendations:
- Prioritise investment scam strategies for over 65 year old
group
- Have intervention strateigy to reduce investment scam losses
of males
- Enforce regulations on mobile apps to intercept investment
scams