Applied Survey Research
First 5 Ventura County

1 What we asked

This summary brings together first-time-family Parenting Ladder outcomes and returning-family Program Improvement feedback. The instruments answer complementary questions and are summarized separately because their identifiers have not been linked.

1.1 Parenting Ladder

Are reported parenting outcomes and gains consistent across annual cohorts after accounting for participant characteristics?

The analysis uses each participant’s earliest valid, unambiguous Parenting Ladder survey in the available export. The primary sample contains 1,256 participants, with 4 fiscal-year cohorts represented (2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025-26). Participants retrospectively rated their skills BEFORE PACT and NOW at the same assessment. These are annual cohorts, rather than repeated measurements of the same families over time.

2 Main findings

  • Participants reported positive BEFORE-to-NOW gains in the three Parenting Ladder factors in every represented cohort.
  • Adjusted annual NOW outcomes were broadly similar. Modest year differences remained for knowledge, confidence, and abilities and for reading frequency.
  • Age, ethnicity, and primary language jointly contributed to explaining outcomes. Models adding education, employment, and income provided sensitivity checks.
  • Exploratory tests did not detect changes in income- or education-related associations across years.
  • Internal consistency supported retaining the established factors, although it does not establish measurement equivalence across years or languages.

These findings remain preliminary pending residual-diagnostic review. Similar estimates or nonsignificant year tests do not establish equivalence. The data do not estimate causal program impacts or participation dosage.

3 Annual reported gains

Gains compare matched retrospective ratings on the 1–7 Ladder scale. They represent perceived change, not change measured from a prospective pretest.

4 Outcomes after accounting for cohort composition

Core models adjust for retrospective BEFORE ratings, age, ethnicity, and primary language. Adjusted annual estimates standardize years to the same participant-characteristic distribution within each outcome’s model sample.

Outcome Lowest adjusted NOW Highest adjusted NOW Model sample Year difference detected
Access to services 6.22 6.26 1173 No
Knowledge, confidence, and abilities 6.36 6.49 1178 Yes
Managing parenting stress 5.92 6.12 1165 No
Reading 5.88 6.14 1132 Yes
Singing 6.39 6.57 1124 No
Social support 5.43 5.59 1171 No
Talking 6.31 6.41 1130 No

Ladder outcomes use 1–7 ratings. Reading, talking, and singing use 0–7 days per week. Year-difference classifications use joint year tests adjusted across seven outcomes; they do not identify specific significant pairwise contrasts.

5 Reliability and data coverage

Factor Rating Lowest alpha Highest alpha
Access to services NOW 0.774 0.840
Access to services BEFORE 0.868 0.918
Knowledge, confidence, and abilities NOW 0.897 0.913
Knowledge, confidence, and abilities BEFORE 0.933 0.938
Social support NOW 0.821 0.898
Social support BEFORE 0.849 0.909

Alpha describes internal consistency using complete factor responses. It does not measure test-retest reliability. Social-support NOW alpha declines descriptively across cohorts; this has not been formally tested.

Income is missing, declined, or unclassified for approximately 38–50% of each cohort. Income-adjusted findings therefore describe a smaller complete-case sample and are treated as sensitivity analyses. Excluded participants differ from included participants on some observed characteristics.

6 Program Improvement: returning-family feedback

How do returning families describe their program experience and family outcomes across annual cohorts?

The Program Improvement export contains 880 raw records and 609 distinct Record IDs. Preparation retained 872 unambiguous assessment episodes. Primary annual summaries use the latest unambiguous assessment per ID/year, yielding 721 annual records. These are not all unique families across years.

Fiscal year Annual records Distinct IDs Analysis episodes
2021-22 1 1 2
2022-23 177 177 214
2023-24 229 229 303
2024-25 170 170 199
2025-26 144 144 154
Record ID is a provisional person/family identifier. Repeated survey records describe observed assessments; they do not establish attendance, service intensity, or the number of times a family participated. The earliest fiscal year has only two raw records and should be read descriptively.

6.1 Services and Staff

The charts retain the item groupings used in prior annual reports. Percentages show the highest agreement category on the four-category response scale, using each item’s valid-response denominator. Scroll within the chart to view all items. Hover over bars or points for estimates and sample sizes; click legend entries to show or hide fiscal years.

6.2 Parent and Family Outcomes

These items describe perceived family outcomes. They are not paired BEFORE/NOW ratings. The two reporting domains are not presented as validated latent factors.

6.3 Activities with children

Activity ratings share the Parenting Ladder’s 0–7 days-per-week scale. The groups have not been matched, and this summary does not interpret their differences as effects of repeat participation.

6.4 Repeated records and next questions

There are 178 IDs with multiple retained assessments, including 102 observed in more than one fiscal year. Person/family identifier continuity is awaiting confirmation.

Within-person change estimates are withheld until identifier continuity is confirmed. Confirmed IDs would support earliest-to-latest and repeated-assessment analyses; participation exports would support more direct dosage questions.

6.5 Preparation and comparability

Of six same-date ID groups requiring review, four agree on numeric outcomes but differ in open text. Their numeric responses count once; all original text is retained for review. Two groups have conflicting numeric outcomes and are excluded pending adjudication. The separate technical module exports these records, item distributions, and an all-episode sensitivity summary.

Primary annual summaries select one assessment per ID/year, so counts can differ from prior reports that used every survey row. No new thematic findings are asserted from the open-ended responses. No demographic variables beyond survey language are included in this export.

7 What this means for the program

The available data support examining the recurrence of reported parenting gains and broadly similar outcome levels across annual cohorts. The modest remaining year differences warrant examining their magnitude and program context. The Program Improvement results add returning-family feedback and a larger bank of repeated assessments. Verified identifier continuity and participation history are needed to extend the work to within-family change and dosage.

8 Methods in brief

Fiscal years use July–June survey dates. Duplicate ID/date/outcome records are collapsed; conflicting response sets on a date are excluded pending review. Established factors use items 1–11, 12–13, and 14–15; stress management is separate. Factor scores use available-item means, with complete-factor and earliest/latest record sensitivity checks in the technical analysis. Models use HC3 standard errors and multiple-comparison adjustment. No untreated comparison group is available. The technical RMD retains the detailed modeling and QA documentation.