TEXT
My first recitation: Using Markdown for the first time
[Link] https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/PHYTO-10-19-0386-R)
If you need more information about this technique ASD, please contact the authors of the paper, Anna Testen, Andres Sanabria and Karina Garcia from Ohio State University.
In this oportunity just results will be discussed, but if you need more information about the objectives, methods and materials, please contact the authors of the paper.
T1: Aerobic control - nontreated soil + soil saturation
T2: Anaerobic control - nontreated soil + soil saturation
T3: Soil treated with wheat bran + soil saturation
T4: Soil treated with wheat bran and molasses + soil saturation
Code chunk 1 - Ctrl + Alt + I
#Uploading data
library(readxl)
## Warning: package 'readxl' was built under R version 4.5.3
pHdata <- read_excel("C:/Master Ohio Classes/Fall 2026/Data Visualization/Data for recitation.xlsx")
summary(pHdata)
## Block Treatment pH
## Length:16 Length:16 Min. :4.900
## Class :character Class :character 1st Qu.:5.075
## Mode :character Mode :character Median :5.550
## Mean :5.625
## 3rd Qu.:6.200
## Max. :6.600
Code chunk 2 - using the Add Chunk command in the editor toolbar and select R
#Test when the distribution is not normal
friedman_result <- friedman.test(pH ~ Treatment | Block, data = pHdata)
print(friedman_result)
##
## Friedman rank sum test
##
## data: pH and Treatment and Block
## Friedman chi-squared = 11.1, df = 3, p-value = 0.0112
Code chunk 3 - using the Add Chunk command in the editor toolbar and select R
#Test to compare all pairs of treatments using Nemenyi test
install.packages("PMCMRplus")
library(PMCMRplus)
frdAllPairsNemenyiTest(pH ~ Treatment | Block, data = pHdata)
Pairwise comparisons using Nemenyi-Wilcoxon-Wilcox all-pairs test for a two-way balanced complete block design
Data: pH and Treatment and Block
T4 vs. T1 (p = 0.014): Significant. Because this value is less than 0.05, there is a statistically significant difference in pH between Treatment 1 and Treatment 4.
T4 vs. T2 (p = 0.066): Not significant (Marginal). This is slightly above 0.05. While there might be a slight trend, it is not strictly statistically significant.
All other pairs (p > 0.05): Not significant.
T2 vs. T1 (p = 0.947) — Highly similar.
T3 vs. T1 (p = 0.221) — No significant difference.
T3 vs. T2 (p = 0.519) — No significant difference.
T4 vs. T3 (p = 0.692) — No significant difference.