library(tidyverse)
## Warning: package 'tidyverse' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'ggplot2' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'tibble' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'tidyr' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'readr' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'purrr' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'dplyr' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'stringr' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'forcats' was built under R version 4.6.1
## Warning: package 'lubridate' was built under R version 4.6.1
## ── Attaching core tidyverse packages ──────────────────────── tidyverse 2.0.0 ──
## ✔ dplyr     1.2.1     ✔ readr     2.2.0
## ✔ forcats   1.0.1     ✔ stringr   1.6.0
## ✔ ggplot2   4.0.3     ✔ tibble    3.3.1
## ✔ lubridate 1.9.5     ✔ tidyr     1.3.2
## ✔ purrr     1.2.2     
## ── Conflicts ────────────────────────────────────────── tidyverse_conflicts() ──
## ✖ dplyr::filter() masks stats::filter()
## ✖ dplyr::lag()    masks stats::lag()
## ℹ Use the conflicted package (<http://conflicted.r-lib.org/>) to force all conflicts to become errors
library(readxl)
## Warning: package 'readxl' was built under R version 4.6.1
district<-read_excel("district.xls")
data1<-district %>% select(DISTNAME,DPETSPEP,DPFPASPEP)
summary(data1)
##       DISTNAME       DPETSPEP       DPFPASPEP     
##  Length   :1207   Min.   : 0.00   Min.   : 0.000  
##  N.unique :1196   1st Qu.: 9.90   1st Qu.: 5.800  
##  N.blank  :   0   Median :12.10   Median : 8.900  
##  Min.nchar:   7   Mean   :12.27   Mean   : 9.711  
##  Max.nchar:  50   3rd Qu.:14.20   3rd Qu.:12.500  
##                   Max.   :51.70   Max.   :49.000  
##                                   NAs    :5

which variable as missing values? DPFPASPEP has missing values.

data2<-data1 %>% na.omit()

1,207 observations in data1. 1,202 observations are left in data2.

cor(data2$DPFPASPEP,data2$DPETSPEP)
## [1] 0.3700234

my interpretation: positive correlation, but not a strong correlation. a positive weak correlation between spending on special education and the percent of students in special education.