1. Synopsis

This report analyzes the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Storm Database (1950-2011) to evaluate the impact of severe weather events on public health and the economy in the United States. Data processing involved aggregating total fatalities, injuries, property damage, and crop damage by specific event types. The analysis reveals that Tornadoes are overwhelmingly the most harmful events to population health, causing the highest total number of both fatalities and injuries. In terms of economic consequences, Floods have caused the greatest overall financial damage, followed closely by Hurricanes/Typhoons and Tornadoes.

2. Data Processing

3.1 Most Harmful Events to Population Health

To answer the first question, we visualize the top 10 weather events that cause the highest number of fatalities and injuries across the United States.

# Load thêm thư viện tidyr để chuyển đổi cấu trúc dữ liệu
library(tidyr)
library(ggplot2)

# Chuyển đổi dữ liệu sang dạng dài (Long format)
health_long <- health_summary %>%
  select(EVTYPE, Total_Fatalities, Total_Injuries) %>%
  pivot_longer(cols = c("Total_Fatalities", "Total_Injuries"), 
               names_to = "Impact_Type", 
               values_to = "Count")

# Vẽ biểu đồ
ggplot(health_long, aes(x = reorder(EVTYPE, -Count), y = Count, fill = Impact_Type)) +
  geom_bar(stat = "identity", position = "dodge") +
  labs(title = "Top 10 Most Harmful Weather Events in the US (1950-2011)",
       x = "Event Type",
       y = "Number of People Affected") +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c("Total_Fatalities" = "darkred", "Total_Injuries" = "salmon"),
                    labels = c("Fatalities", "Injuries")) +
  theme_minimal() +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45, hjust = 1, size = 10, face = "bold"),
        plot.title = element_text(face = "bold", size = 14))

Figure 1: Tornadoes are overwhelmingly the most dangerous weather event, causing significantly higher numbers of both injuries and fatalities compared to other events.

3.2 Events with Greatest Economic Consequences

To answer the second question, we examine the total economic damage (combined property and crop damage in USD) caused by the top 10 weather events.

# Vẽ biểu đồ kinh tế
ggplot(econ_summary, aes(x = reorder(EVTYPE, -Total_Econ_Damage), y = Total_Econ_Damage)) +
  geom_bar(stat = "identity", fill = "steelblue") +
  labs(title = "Top 10 Weather Events with Greatest Economic Consequences (1950-2011)",
       x = "Event Type",
       y = "Total Economic Damage (USD)") +
  theme_minimal() +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45, hjust = 1, size = 10, face = "bold"),
        plot.title = element_text(face = "bold", size = 14))

Figure 2: Floods have caused the highest overall economic damage in the US, exceeding 150 billion dollars, followed by Hurricanes/Typhoons and Tornadoes.

4. Discussion and Limitations

While this analysis provides a clear high-level overview of the most harmful weather events in the United States, several methodological caveats must be acknowledged:

  1. Lack of Inflation Adjustment: The economic consequences (property and crop damages) were aggregated using nominal USD values from 1950 to 2011. Because the value of a dollar in 1950 is vastly different from its value in 2011, aggregating these raw values without adjusting for inflation (e.g., using the Consumer Price Index - CPI) introduces a temporal bias. Consequently, the economic impact of older storms might be heavily underestimated compared to recent ones.
  2. Data Quality and Misclassification Bias: The raw EVTYPE variable contains 985 unique entries, many of which are typographical errors or synonymous terms (e.g., “TSTM WIND” vs. “THUNDERSTORM WINDS”). Although basic text normalization (capitalization and trimming) was applied in our data processing step, a more rigorous epidemiological study would require using Regular Expressions (Regex) to map all 985 raw entries into the 48 official NWS Directive 10-1605 storm data events.

Addressing these limitations in future analyses would yield a more precise and historically accurate assessment for municipal resource allocation.