GOVT 2306: US and Texas Constitution and Politics
2026-09-23
By the end of today you will explain why the Texas Constitution puts rights first and structure two articles “behind” the U.S. model, why its length reflects residual state power under federalism, and how the plural executive and dual high courts differ from the national design.
Historical pathways to limited government in Texas
Even more suspicious of concentrated power than the U.S. Founders
Written in the language of rights of “the people” — language we now apply far more equally than in 1876
U.S. powers first versus Texas rights first
Side-by-side article maps of U.S. and Texas Constitutions
Because Texas put the Bill of Rights in Article I
| U.S. | Texas |
|---|---|
| Article I — Legislature | Article III — Legislature |
| Article II — Executive | Article IV — Executive |
| Article III — Judiciary | Article V — Judiciary |
Texas Article I = Bill of Rights
Texas Article II = powers of government / separation
U.S. Constitution as thin pamphlet beside thick Texas Constitution
Texas Constitution ≈ 20× the length of the U.S. Constitution
Most governing power was left to the states — so state constitutions do the detailed work
Much of what the modern federal government does sits outside clear enumeration — education is the cleanest example
U.S. Article I → Texas Article III
A part-time, constrained legislature — harder to expand government casually
U.S. Article II → Texas Article IV
U.S. unitary executive beside Texas plural executive
No single elected executive holds the whole executive power
U.S. Article III → Texas Article V
U.S. single Supreme Court beside Texas dual high courts
Harder to change than ordinary statute — another limit on government
Why does the Texas Constitution lag two articles behind the U.S. on legislature, executive, and judiciary?
Do not submit to Quizlet, Chegg, Coursehero, or similar commercial sites.
| Author | Tom Hanna |
| Website | tomhanna.me |
| License | CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 |
UH GOVT 2306, Fall 2026 | Tom Hanna