library(readxl)
library(ggpubr)
## Loading required package: ggplot2
library(dplyr)
## 
## Attaching package: 'dplyr'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
## 
##     filter, lag
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
## 
##     intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
library(effectsize)
library(effsize)

A6Q4_2 <- read_excel("C:/Users/Jasmine/Desktop/AA521 Week 6/A6Q4-2.xlsx")

A6Q4_2 %>%
  group_by(Exercise) %>%
  summarise(
    Mean = mean(Weight, na.rm = TRUE),
    Median = median(Weight, na.rm = TRUE),
    SD = sd(Weight, na.rm = TRUE),
    N = n()
  )
## # A tibble: 2 × 5
##   Exercise  Mean Median    SD     N
##   <chr>    <dbl>  <dbl> <dbl> <int>
## 1 lift     120.   116.   53.3    25
## 2 nolift    33.0   40.8  56.7    25
hist(A6Q4_2$Weight[A6Q4_2$Exercise == "lift"],
          main = "Histogram of Exercise Lift",
          xlab = "Value",
          ylab = "Frequency",
          col = "lightgreen",
          border = "black",
          breaks = 10)

hist(A6Q4_2$Weight[A6Q4_2$Exercise == "nolift"],
     main = "Histogram of Exercise of No Lift",
     xlab = "Value",
     ylab = "Frequency",
     col = "lightgreen",
     border = "black",
     breaks = 10)

#Group 1: Lift
#The first variable looks abnormally distributed.
#The data is positively skewed (skewness = 2.04).
#The data does not have a proper bell curve; it is too tall/peaked (kurtosis = 7.56).

#Group 2: No Lift
#The second variable looks abnormally distributed.
#The data is negatively skewed (skewness = -2.81).
#The data does not have a proper bell curve; it is too tall/peaked (kurtosis = 12.23)

ggboxplot(A6Q4_2, x = "Exercise", y = "Weight",
          color = "Exercise",
          palette = "jco",
          add = "jitter")

#Boxplot 1: Lift
#There are dots outside the boxplot.
#The dots are not close to the whiskers.
#The dots are very far away from the whiskers.
#The outliers are not balanced (both are on the high side).
#Based on these findings, the boxplot is not normal.

#Boxplot 2: No Lift
#There are dots outside the boxplot.
#The dots are not close to the whiskers.
#The dots are very far away from the whiskers.
#The outliers are not balanced (on the low side only).
#Based on these findings, the boxplot is not normal.

shapiro.test(A6Q4_2$Weight[A6Q4_2$Exercise == "lift"])
## 
##  Shapiro-Wilk normality test
## 
## data:  A6Q4_2$Weight[A6Q4_2$Exercise == "lift"]
## W = 0.78786, p-value = 0.0001436
shapiro.test(A6Q4_2$Weight[A6Q4_2$Exercise == "nolift"])
## 
##  Shapiro-Wilk normality test
## 
## data:  A6Q4_2$Weight[A6Q4_2$Exercise == "nolift"]
## W = 0.70002, p-value = 7.294e-06
#Group 1: Lift
#The first group is abnormally distributed, (p < .001).

#Group 2: No Lift
#The second group is abnormally distributed, (p < .001).

t.test(Weight ~ Exercise, data = A6Q4_2, var.equal = TRUE)
## 
##  Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  Weight by Exercise
## t = 5.5923, df = 48, p-value = 1.045e-06
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group lift and group nolift is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##   55.75715 118.35710
## sample estimates:
##   mean in group lift mean in group nolift 
##            120.08238             33.02525
wilcox.test(Weight ~ Exercise, data = A6Q4_2)
## 
##  Wilcoxon rank sum exact test
## 
## data:  Weight by Exercise
## W = 603, p-value = 7.132e-11
## alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
cohens_d_result <- cohens_d(Weight ~ Exercise, data = A6Q4_2, pooled_sd = TRUE)
print(cohens_d_result)
## Cohen's d |       95% CI
## ------------------------
## 1.58      | [0.94, 2.21]
## 
## - Estimated using pooled SD.
mw_effect <- cliff.delta(Weight ~ Exercise, data = A6Q4_2)
print(mw_effect)
## 
## Cliff's Delta
## 
## delta estimate: 0.9296 (large)
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##     lower     upper 
## 0.7993841 0.9764036
#A Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to determine if there was a difference in
#Weight between Lift and No Lift groups.
#Lift scores (Mdn = 115.59) were significantly different from No Lift scores
#(Mdn = 40.84), U = 603.00, p < .001.
#The effect size was large, Cliff's Delta = .93.